The Court of Justice's perspective : Volume 1

Table of Contents

Bibliographic Details
Published:	Oxford ; London ; New York ; New Delhi ; Sydney : Hart, 2022
Superior Title:	Article 47 of the EU Charter and effective judicial protection
Persons:	Bonelli, Matteo <<[HerausgeberIn]>> -, Eliantonio, Mariolina <<[HerausgeberIn]>>, Gentile, Giulia <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
Format:	Book / Printed Book
Language:	English
Physical description:	xxvii, 299 Seiten
ISBN:	9781509947942
Classification - More hits on the same topic:	EG: IX Da = Länder: Europäische Union: Grundrechte: Gesamtdarstellung.

record_format	marc
spelling	Bonelli, Matteo <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Volume 1 The Court of Justice's perspective Oxford ; London ; New York ; New Delhi ; Sydney Hart 2022, 2022 xxvii, 299 Seiten Eliantonio, Mariolina <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Gentile, Giulia <<[HerausgeberIn]>> In Erscheint auch als (Online-Ausgabe): Article 47 of the EU Charter and effective judicial protection Eliantonio, M. https://aleph.mpg.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=VRH01&local_base=VRH01&doc_number=001129294&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA ToC Völkerrecht Heidelberg VIEW
language	English
format	0/Buch/ 1/Buch/PrintBuch/
author	Bonelli, Matteo <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
spellingShingle	Bonelli, Matteo <<[HerausgeberIn]>> The Court of Justice's perspective. Volume 1
author_facet	Bonelli, Matteo <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Bonelli, Matteo <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Eliantonio, Mariolina <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Gentile, Giulia <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
author_role	-
author_sort	Bonelli, Matteo <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
author2	Bonelli, Matteo <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Eliantonio, Mariolina <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Gentile, Giulia <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
author2_role	-
title	The Court of Justice's perspective. Volume 1
title_sub	Volume 1
title_short	The Court of Justice's perspective
title_full	Volume 1 The Court of Justice's perspective
title_fullStr	Volume 1 The Court of Justice's perspective
title_full_unstemmed	Volume 1 The Court of Justice's perspective
title_sort	court of justice's perspective. volume 1
publisher	Hart
publishDate	2022
physical	xxvii, 299 Seiten
isbn	9781509947942
callnumber-first	EG IX Da 342
callnumber-subject	EG
callnumber-label	EG IX DA 342
callnumber-raw	EG: IX DA
callnumber-search	EG: IX DA EG IX Da 342
callnumber-sort	EG
url	https://aleph.mpg.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=VRH01&local_base=VRH01&doc_number=001129294&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
illustrated	Not Illustrated
institution	Local holdings
institution_hierarchy	0/Local holdings/
system_id	001129294
online	false
dedup_id_str	BonelliMatteoHerausgeberInTheCourtofJusticesperspectiveHart
toc_content	/ E&-. 1/ DA: W ARTICLE 47 OF THE EU CHARTER AND EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION, VOLUME 1 THE COURT OF JUSTICES PERSPECTIVE EDITED BY MATTEO BONELLI MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO AND GIULIA GENTILE 2 K FEB. 2023 CONTENTS LIST OF AUTHORS ....................................................................................................................... XI LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................... XIII LIST OF CASES .......................................................................................................................... XV INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 MATTEO BONELLI, MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO AND GIULIA GENTILE THE PROJECT ...................................................................................................................... 1 THE FIRST VOLUME AND ITS STRUCTURE .....................................
local_classification	EG: IX Da
hierarchy_parent_id	001136337
id	001147940
work_keys_str_mv	AT bonellimatteoherausgeberin courtofjusticesperspectivevolume1
first_indexed	2024-05-05T23:45:21Z
last_indexed	2024-05-05T23:45:21Z
_version_	1799500437872705537
fullrecord	23561nam 2200541 u 4500001001200000003002700012008003900039007002400078020002600102020001500128090001700143100004000160245004900200260007000249300002200319700004600341700004000387773002400427041001900451993000800470993000900478980004000487981004600527981004000573984013400613775010400747024001800851024001800869084001400887998001400901998003600915998001400951696001900965856020900984992199401193992192303187992199205110992196807102992200209070992197311072992200113045992193015046992199016976992199918966992192420965852002522889999010522914VR001147940VRH01000000000000001129294t s2022 r \|\|\| engtu\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\| a978-1-5099-4794-2cHB a1509947949 aEG IX Da 3421 aBonelli, Matteo <<[HerausgeberIn]>>04nVolume 1aThe Court of Justice's perspective aOxford ; London ; New York ; New Delhi ; SydneybHartc2022, 2022 axxvii, 299 Seiten1 aEliantonio, Mariolina <<[HerausgeberIn]>>1 aGentile, Giulia <<[HerausgeberIn]>>08wMPIL.001136337iIn:07aeng2ISO 639-2 atoc a2303 2aBonelli, Matteo <<[HerausgeberIn]>> 2aEliantonio, Mariolina <<[HerausgeberIn]>> 2aGentile, Giulia <<[HerausgeberIn]>> 2aArticle 47 of the EU Charter and effective judicial protectioncedited by Matteo Bonelli, Mariolina Eliantonio and Giulia Gentile tErscheint auch als (Online-Ausgabe): Article 47 of the EU Charter and effective judicial protection8 a97815099479423 a9781509947942 aEG: IX Da aEG: IX Da aGrundrechte: Gesamtdarstellung. aEG: IX Da aEliantonio, M. uhttps://aleph.mpg.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=VRH01&local_base=VRH01&doc_number=001129294&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA3ToCmVölkerrecht HeidelbergzVIEW a/ E&-. 1/ DA: W ARTICLE 47 OF THE EU CHARTER AND EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION, VOLUME 1 THE COURT OF JUSTICES PERSPECTIVE EDITED BY MATTEO BONELLI MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO AND GIULIA GENTILE 2 K FEB. 2023 CONTENTS LIST OF AUTHORS ....................................................................................................................... XI LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................... XIII LIST OF CASES .......................................................................................................................... XV INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 MATTEO BONELLI, MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO AND GIULIA GENTILE THE PROJECT ...................................................................................................................... 1 THE FIRST VOLUME AND ITS STRUCTURE ............................................................................... 6 PART 1 THE CONSTITUTIONAL DIMENSION OF ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER 1. ARTICLE 19 TEU AND NATIONAL COURTS: A NEW ROLE FOR THE PRINCIPLE OF EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION? ............................................................................. 11 SACHA PRECHAL I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 11 II. FROM VAN GEND & LOOS TO ARTICLE 19(1) TEU ................................................. 13 III. ARTICLE 19(1) TEU BROUGHT TO LIFE ................................................................... 16 IV. THE CONTENT AND SCOPE OF APPLICATION OF EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION ..... 19 V. ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE .......................................................................................... 22 VI. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................... 25 2. aSEARCHING FOR THE PIECES OF THE EU JUSTICE PUZZLE: ARTICLES 47, 48, 49 AND 50 OF THE EU CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS .......................................................... 27 GIULIA GENTILE AND SERENA MENZIONE I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 27 II. THE JUSTICE TITLE OF THE CHARTER: A SYSTEMATIC READING ................................. 29 III. INTERDEPENDENT BUT AUTONOMOUS: ARTICLES 47 AND 48 OF THE EU CHARTER ......................................................................................... 32 IV. RECIPROCAL INFLUENCES AND MISSED OPPORTUNITIES: ARTICLE 47 AND ARTICLE 49 CHARTER ..................................................................................... 36 V. SHINING IN THEIR OWN LIGHTS: ARTICLES 47 AND 50 CHARTER .............................. 38 VI. FINDING (SOME) PIECES OF THE EU JUSTICE JIGSAW PUZZLE ................................. 41 VIL CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 44 VI CONTENTS 3. EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION BEFORE NATIONAL COURTS: ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER, NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND THE PRELIMINARY REFERENCE PROCEDURE... 45 ANNA WALLERMAN GHAVANINI AND CLARA RAUCHEGGER I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 45 II. THE PRELIMINARY REFERENCE AS AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT ......................................... 46 A. THE EU LAW PERSPECTIVE ........................................................................... 46 B. THE NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE ......................................... 50 III. TOWARDS A MORE RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH? ....................................................... 54 IV. ENHANCING JUDICIAL PROTECTION THROUGH EMPOWERED NATIONAL COURTS ....... 56 V. CONCLUSIONS a....................................................................................................... 59 4. THE EU RIGHT TO AN INDEPENDENT JUDGE: HOW MUCH CONSENSUS ACROSS THE EU? ........61 MICHAL KRAJEWSKI I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 61 II. THE MANDATE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE ................................................................ 64 A. CONSTITUTIONAL SOURCES: ARTICLE 19 TEU AND ARTICLE 47 OF THE EU CHARTER .................................................................................... 64 B. LEGAL AVENUES AND DIFFERENT PROBLEMS ................................................. 66 C. COMPARATIVE REASONING AND RISKY TRANSPLANTS .................................... 68 III. DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE ................................................... 71 A. DECISION-MAKING INDEPENDENCE AND JUDICIAL TENURE ........................... 71 B. PERSONAL INDEPENDENCE AND JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS .............................. 74 C. ORGANISATIONAL INDEPENDENCE AND JUDICIAL GOVERNANCE ....................... 77 IV. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................... 79 5. ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER, EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION AND THE (PROCEDURAL) AUTONOMY OF THE MEMBER STATES .......................................................................... 81 MATTEO BONELLI I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 81 II. EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION, ARTICLE 47 AND PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY ............ 83 III. PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN ARTICLE 47 AND EU SECONDARY LEGISLATION ........................................................................ 86 IV. ' REMEDIAL ' AUTONOMY: THE EMPOWERING FUNCTION OF ARTICLE 47 ................. 90 V. INSTITUTIONAL AND STRUCTURAL AUTONOMY: JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE a.................. 94 VI. WHAT HAS ARTICLE 47 CHANGED? CONCLUDING THOUGHTS .................................. 96 6. ' A SPECTRE IS HAUNTING KIRCHBERG ' - THE SPECTRE OF ARTICLE 47: THE CJEU CASE LAW ON THE FINALITY OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS AND ON THE EX OFFICIO APPLICATION OFEU LAW ...... 99 MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 99 II. RE-OPENING FINAL JUDICIAL DECISIONS: PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY LIMITED BY EQUIVALENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS ........................................................... 101 A. THE PRINCIPLE OF NATIONAL PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY AS THE DEFAULT POSITION ........................................................................... 101 CONTENTS VII B. LIMITATIONS IMPOSED BY THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE ......................... 102 C. LIMITATIONS IMPOSED BY THE PRINCIPLE OF EFFECTIVENESS ....................... 104 D. THE LUCCHINI CASE AND ITS FOLLOW-UP ..................................................... 106 E. INTERIM CONCLUSION ................................................................................. 108 III. RAISING POINTS OF EU LAW EX OFFICIO .............................................................. ILL A. THE ' RULE ' : PETERBROECK AND VAN SCHIIJNDEL ............................................ ILL B. THE EXCEPTIONS: EU LAW AS A MATTER OF PUBLIC POLICY ......................... 112 C. EX OFFICIO APPLICATION OF EU LAW TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE APPLICANT ....................................................................................... 115 D. INTERIM CONCLUSION ................................................................................. 116 IV. CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 118 PART 2 ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER IN SELECTED POLICY AREAS 7. THE ROLE OF ARTICLE 47 OF THE EU CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE FIELD OF aNON-DISCRIMINATION: ONWARDS AND UPWARDS ................................ 123 KATHLEEN GUTMAN I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 123 II. ORIGINS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER AND NON-DISCRIMINATION ................................................................................ 124 III. ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER AND THE MAIN DIRECTIVES IN THE FIELD OF NON-DISCRIMINATION .............................................................................. 128 A. EFFECTIVE ACCESS TO THE COURTS ................................................................. 128 B. PROTECTION AGAINST RETALIATION ................................................................. 130 C. BURDEN OF PROOF ........................................................................................ 130 D. STANDING OF EQUALITY BODIES AND OTHER ENTITIES .................................... 132 E. FORMS OF REDRESS ...................................................................................... 134 IV. OPPORTUNITIES FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER IN THE FIELD OF NON-DISCRIMINATION ................................ 136 A. PROCEDURAL OBSTACLES AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL .......................................... 136 B. TASKS OF NATIONAL COURTS AND OTHER COMPETENT BODIES ..................... 137 V. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 138 8. NO TURNING BACK? THE EMPOWERMENT OF NATIONAL ASYLUM AND MIGRATION COURTS UNDER ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER .............................................................. 141 MARCELLE RENEMAN I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 141 II. ENSURING THE JURISDICTION OF NATIONAL COURTS ............................................... 143 III. THE SCOPE AND INTENSITY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW: DEFINING T aROLE OF THE NATIONAL COURTS ......................................................................................... 147 A. THE DETENTION JUDGE: A HABEAS CORPUS EXAMINATION ......................... 148 B. THE ASYLUM JUDGE: A FULL AND EX NUNC EXAMINATION ......................... 149 VIII CONTENTS C. DUBLIN CASES: FROM A LIMITED TO A FULL JUDICIAL REVIEW ( AND BACK )? ..................................................................................... 153 D. VISA CASES: A LIGHTER FORM OF JUDICIAL REVIEW ..................................... 155 IV. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 156 9. ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER AND THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT: CHRONICLE OF A DEATH FORETOLD? ............................................................................................ 159 ADRIANO MARTUFI I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 159 II. THE ROLE OF ' JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES ' AND THE RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE REMEDY: HESITANCY AND DEFERENCE IN THE EARLY CASE LAW OF THE COURT ............ 161 III. THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN AUTONOMOUS CONCEPT OF ' JUDICIAL AUTHORITY ' AND THE GROWING LIMITS TO PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY: A NEGATIVE OBLIGATION? .................................................................................... 163 IV. WHAT ROLE FOR PUBLIC PROSECUTORS? JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY AND THE DISAPPEARANCE OF ARTICLE 47 .............. 165 V. THE APPROACH OF THE COURT TO ' JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE ' AND THE EAW: INCONSISTENCIES AND DOUBLE STANDARDS .................................................... 169 VI. THE RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL REMEDY AND THE EAW: ARTICLE 47 AND HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDINGS .......................................... 172 VIL CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... a175 10. ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY: DOES IT AFFORD AN ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION TO PRIVATE PARTIES? ................................................. 177 SARA POLI I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 177 II. ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER AS AN INSTRUMENT TO BROADLY INTERPRET THE COMPETENCE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE WITH RESPECT TO ACTS ADOPTED IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE CFSP ................................................................... 179 III. THE LEGAL STANDING TO CHALLENGE RESTRICTIVE MEASURES IN THE LIGHT OF ARTICLE 47 OF THE EUCFR: ARE THERE ANY LIMITS TO ITS SCOPE RATIONE PERSONAE ? ................................................................................... 183 IV. AN OVERVIEW OF THE SUBSTANCE OF ANNULMENT ACTIONS AGAINST INDIVIDUAL RESTRICTIVE MEASURES: AN ENHANCED PROTECTION OF DUE PROCESS RIGHTS ................................................................................. 186 V. THE OBLIGATION OF THE COUNCIL TO VERIFY THAT THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION AND THE RIGHT OF DEFENCE ARE RESPECTED BY THIRD COUNTRIES ........................................................................................ 188 VI. CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................... 192 CONTENTS IX 11. ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER AND EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS: THE NEED TO GRANT CIVIL SOCIETY THE RIGHT TO DEFEND THE ENVIRONMENT ..... 1 95 LUDWIG KRAMER I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 195 II. THE CJEU AND ACCESS TO ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ........................................... 197 A. ACCESS TO THE EUROPEAN COURTS .............................................................. 197 III. THE AARHUS CONVENTION aAND ITS CRITICISM OF THE EU PUBLIC AUTHORITIES ....................................................................................................... 200 A. THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ...................................................... 202 B. THE CONTROVERSY BETWEEN THE EU AND THE AARHUS CONVENTION ......... 206 IV. POSSIBLE WAYS AHEAD ...................................................................................... 208 A. APPLYING ARTICLE 9(2) OF REGULATION 1367/2006 ................................... 209 B. IMPROVING PARTICIPATION IN GMO-RELATED DECISIONS ........................... 210 C. ACCEPTING ENVIRONMENTAL NGOS AS ' NEGOTIATORS ' ................................ 211 V. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................... 211 12. ARTICLE 47 OF THE EU CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE FIELD OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: TIME TO TAKE THE CHARTER SERIOUSLY?. ............................ 213 ROBERTO CARANTA I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 214 II. THE CODIFICATION OF PROCUREMENT REMEDIES ................................................ 215 III. GAPS AND SHORTCOMINGS IN THE PROCUREMENT REMEDIES DIRECTIVES ........... 216 A. ANNULMENT .............................................................................................. 217 B. DAMAGES .................................................................................................. 222 IV. ARTICLE 47 AND PROCUREMENT REMEDIES ........................................................ 224 V. CONCLUSIONS: GUIDANCE IS BADLY NEEDED ...................................................... 227 13. ARTICLE 47 OF THE EU CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN EU COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT ............................... 231 ANDRIANI KALINTIRI I. INTRODUCTION a.................................................................................................... 231 II. ARTICLE 47 EUCFR IN COMPETITION JUDGMENTS IN NUMBERS ........................ 233 III. THE MANIFESTATIONS OF ARTICLE 47 EUCFR IN COMPETITION JUDGMENTS ....... 237 A. THE RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE REMEDY ......................................................... 237 B. THE RIGHT TO A HEARING BY AN INDEPENDENT AND IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL ................................................................................................... 239 C. THE RIGHT TO A HEARING WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME .............................. 241 D. THE DUTY TO STATE REASONS ....................................................................... 243 E. THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE, THE RIGHTS OF DEFENCE AND THE EQUALITY OF ARMS PRINCIPLE .............................................................. 245 IV. A MULTIFACETED PRINCIPLE IN THE PROCESS OF CRYSTALLISATION ......................... 246 V. THE ROLE OF ARTICLE 47 EUCFR IN COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT .....................247 VI. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 250 X CONTENTS 14. THE EVOLUTION OF THE RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE REMEDY AND TO A FAIR TRIAL IN DIRECT AND INDIRECT TAXATION: ARE WE THERE YET? ........................................... 251 KATERINA PANTAZATOU I. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................251 II. THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION AND TO AN EFFECTIVE REMEDY IN TAX MATTERS: SETTING UP THE FRAMEWORK ............................ 252 III. THE RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE REMEDY IN THE CONTEXT OF EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ( BERLIOZ I AND BERLIOZ II ) .............................................. 255 A. BERLIOZ 1 .................................................................................................... 255 B. LUXEMBOURG V B AND OTHERS ( ' BERLIOZ II ) a.............................................. 257 IV. LUXEMBOURG STATE V L ...................................................................................... 261 V. THE RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE REMEDY AND TO A FAIR TRIAL IN INDIRECT TAXATION ( VAT ) ......................................................................................... 263 A. EFFECTIVE ACCESS TO JUSTICE: LEGAL FEES AND THE GRANT OF LEGAL AID: ORDRE DES BARREAUX FRANCOPHONES ET GERMANOPHONE AND OTHERS ......... 263 B. COLLECTION AND USE OF EVIDENCE IN PROVING VAT FRAUD: DZIVEV .......... 264 VI. USE OF EVIDENCE FROM CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE TAXPAYER ....................................................................................... 266 A. WEBMINDLICENSES .................................................................................... 266 VIL CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................... 269 15. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................. 273 MATTEO BONELLI, MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO AND GIULIA GENTILE I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 273 II. THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPACT OF ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER IN THE EU LEGAL LANDSCAPE: BETWEEN CONTINUITY AND RUPTURE ............................ 273 III. ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER IN THE POLICY AREAS: A KALEIDOSCOPE OF COLOURS WITH INCREASINGLY MORE VISIBLE SHAPES .............................. 276 A. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTICLE 47 AND THE PRINCIPLE OF EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION ...................................................... 276 B. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTICLE 47, EU SECONDARY RULES OF A PROCEDURAL NATURE, PRIMARY LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ... 277 IV. THE PIVOTAL ROLE OF ARTICLE 47 TO FURTHER THE ACQUIS COMMUNAUTAIRE ........279 V. THE BROAD RANGE OF PROCEDURAL AREAS AFFECTED BY aARTICLE 47 .....................282 VI. CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 284 INDEX ................................................................................................................................... 287 LIST OF AUTHORS MATTEO BONELLI IS ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF EU LAW AT MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY. ROBERTO CARANTA IS PROFESSOR OF ADMININSTRATIVE LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TURIN. MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO IS PROFESSOR OF EUROPEAN AND COMPARATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE AT MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY. GIULIA GENTILE IS FELLOW IN LAW AT THE LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS LAW SCHOOL. KATHLEEN GUTMAN IS A REFERENDAIRE IN THE CHAMBERS OF ADVOCATE GENERAL TAMARA CAPETA AT THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. ANDRIANI KALINTIRI IS LECTURER IN COMPETITION LAW AT KING ' S COLLEGE LONDON. MICHAL KRAJEWSKI IS A POSTDOCTORAL RESEARCH FELLOW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN, ICOURTS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR INTERNATIONAL COURTS. LUDWIG KRAMER IS (RETIRED) HEAD OF UNIT AT THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT. ADRIANO MARTUFI IS ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF CRIMINAL LAW AT THE LEIDEN LAW SCHOOL. SERENA MENZIONE IS A PHD RESEARCHER AT THE INSTITUTE FOR EUROPEAN LAW OF KU LEUVEN. KATERINA PANTAZATOU IS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR IN TAX LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG. SARA POLI IS FULL PROFESSOR OF EUROPEAN UNION LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PISA. SACHA PRECHAL IS JUDGE AT THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND PROFESSOR OF EUROPEAN LAW, UTRECHT UNIVERSITY. CLARA RAUCHEGGER IS ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF EUROPEAN UNION LAW AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK. MARCELLE RENEMAN IS ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF MIGRATION LAW AT THE AMSTERDAM CENTRE FOR MIGRATION AND REFUGEE LAW OF THE VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT AMSTERDAM. ANNA WALLERMAN GHAVANINI IS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF EU LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG. cEG: IX Da: 342mBOOK aVRH50bMPVRHcInstitutsbibliothekdEG: IX Da: 342eunavailabletNicht verfügbarf1g1hNi5jBIBki