|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
14196nam 2200433 u 4500 |
| 001 |
VR001135949 |
| 003 |
VRH01000000000000001117303 |
| 008 |
t s2022 r ||| eng |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 978-3-86965-387-7
|c : Broschur : EUR 138.00 (DE) (freier Preis), EUR 141.90 (AT) (freier Preis)
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 3-86965-387-6
|
| 090 |
|
|
|a EG XIII Bb 156/2
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Buts, Caroline <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Milestones in state aid case law
|b EStAL's first 20 years in perspective
|c Caroline Buts, José Luis Buendía Sierra (eds)
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a 2nd edition
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Berlin
|b Lexxion Publisher
|c [2022], 2022
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XVIII, 787 Seiten : Diagramme
|c 21 cm, 1030 g
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Buendia Sierra, José Luis <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 993 |
|
|
|a 2301
|
| 993 |
|
|
|a toc
|
| 024 |
8 |
|
|a 9783869653877
|
| 024 |
3 |
|
|a 9783869653877
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a EG: XIII Bb
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a EG: XIII Bb
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a Mitgliedstaatliche Beihilfe. Mitgliedstaatliche Subvention.
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a EG: XIII Bb
|
| 696 |
|
|
|a Buendia, José Luis
|
| 696 |
|
|
|a Sierra, José Luis Buendia
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u https://aleph.mpg.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=VRH01&local_base=VRH01&doc_number=001117303&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
|3 ToC
|m Völkerrecht Heidelberg
|z VIEW
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................. V MARGRETHE VESTAGER INTRODUCTION: THE LAW OF THE - STATE AID - JUNGLE ....................................... VII CAROLINE BUTS AND JOSE LUIS BUENDIA CHAPTER 1 BP CHEMICALS ' . AN IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION ON THE APPLICABILITY OF THE MEOP THAT STILL WAITS FOR ITS FULL RECOGNITION .......................... 1 CASE T-L 1/95 BP CHEMICALS LIMITED V EUROPEAN COMMISSION ( ' BP CHEMICALS ' ) [1998] MAYYGORZATA AGNIESZKA CYNDECKA CHAPTER 2 EVERY FAMILY IS THE SAME, EVERY FAMILY IS DIFFERENT: STATE AID AND FREE MOVEMENT ................... 23 CASE C 169/08 PRESIDENTE DEL CONSIGLIO DEI MINISTRI V REGIONE AUTONOMA DELLA SARDEGNA ( ' LUXURY TAX ' ) [2009] ANDREA BIONDI CHAPTER 3 PREUSSENELEKTRA I DEAD OR ALIVE ? ............................................................... 33 CASE C-379/98 PREUSSENELEKTRA AG V SCHLESWAG AG [2001] KAI STRUCKMANN CHAPTER 4 WHEN IS STATE AID GRANTED BY PUBLIC ( OR EVEN PRIVATE ) UNDERTAKINGS IMPUTABLE TO THE STATE? ...................................................... 51 CASE C-482/99 FRENCH REPUBLIC V COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ( ' STARDUST MARINE ' ) [2002] JUAN JORGE PIERNAS LOPEZ CHAPTER 5 ALTMARK ' . DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CASE LAW 2018-2021 ............................ 69 CASE C-280/00 ALTMARK TRANS AND REGIERUNGSPRASIDIUM MAGDEBURG [2003] PHEDON NICOLAIDES BIBLIOGRAFISCHE INFORMATIONEN HTTP://D-NB.INFO/1257991647 DIGITALISIERT DURCH EUTSCHE WIONYYYY BI.IOTHEK YY YY XI CHAPTER 6 THE PRINCIPLES FOR RECOVERY: SMI AND THE IMPORTANCE OF A METICULOUS ASSESSMENT OF STATE INTERVENTIONS BY THE GRANTING AUTHORITIES AND THE COMMISSION ............................................................... 91 CASE C-277/00 GERMANY V COMMISSION ( ' SMI ' ) [2004] MARIA SEGURA, MARIANNE CLAYTON AND GAETAN ROELANTS DU VIVIER CHAPTER 7 PEARLE AND THE LIFECYCLE APPROACH ........................................................
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a 107 CASE C-345/02 PEARLE AND OTHERS [2004] LEIGH HANCHER AND ANNA NOWAK-SALLES CHAPTER 8 BELGIUM AND FORUM 187 ONCE AGAIN REVISITED ..................................... 121 JOINED CASES C 182/03 AND C-2 17/03 BELGIUM AND FORUM 187 V COMMISSION [2006] WOUT DE COCK AND TONY JORIS CHAPTER 9 TALES FROM AN OUTERMOST REGION: HOW DOES THE AZORES JUDGMENT LOOK FROM A DISTANCE? ................................................................................. 139 CASE C-88/03 PORTUGAL V COMMISSION ( ' AZORES ' ) [2006] FIONA WISHLADE CHAPTER 10 LABORATOIRES BOIROM A RETROSPECTIVE ....................................................... 149 CASE C-526/04 LABORATOIRES BOIRON SA V ACOSS [2006] ISABEL TAYLOR CHAPTER 11 BUPAT THE ILLUSION OF FLEXIBILITY THAT STRENGTHENED ALTMARK ............. 159 CASE T-289/03 BUPA AND OTHERS V COMMISSION [2008] ALFONSO LAMADRID DE PABLO CHAPTER 12 THE RYANAIR CHARLEROI JUDGMENT: WHAT IS ITS LEGACY? .......................... 167 CASET-196/04 RYANAIR V COMMISSION ( ' RYANAIR CHARLEROI ' ) [2008] NICOLE ROBINS AND LING YANG XII CHAPTER 13 THE BRITISH AGGREGATES SAGA: LOOKING BACK AT AN EARLIER STAGE OF THE SELECTIVITY DISCUSSION ...................................................................... 183 CASE C-487/06 P BRITISH AGGREGATES ASSOCIATION V EUROPEAN COMMISSION [2008] CLEMENS ZIEGLER CHAPTER 14 THE POWERS AND OBLIGATIONS OF NATIONAL COURTS WITH REGARD TO UNLAWFUL STATE AID CONTROL: LESSONS LEARNED FROM CELFI AND CELF II ......................................................................................................... 193 CASE C-199/06 CELF V SIDE ( ' CELF I ' ) [2007] AND CASE C-L/09 CELF V SIDE ( ' CELF II ) [2010] JACQUES DERENNE CHAPTER 15 THE STATUS OF COMPLAINANTS IN STATE AID CASES: A LOOK BACK INTO THE ATHINKAIKI TECHNIKI SAGA ............................................................. 209 CASE C-521/06 P ATHINAIKI TECHNIKI AE V COMMISSION (ATHINAIKI TECHNIKI I ' ) [2008] AND CASE
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a C-362/09 P ATHINAIKI TECHNIKI AE V COMMISSION ( ' ATHINAIKI TECHNIKI II ' ) [2010] FERNANDO PASTOR-MERCHANTE CHAPTER 16 FINDING SELECTIVITY OR THE ART OF COMPARISON .......................................... 223 JOINED CASES C-78 TO 80/08 PAINT GRAPHOS AND OTHERS [2011] JOSE LUIS BUENDIA SIERRA CHAPTER 17 THE NOX CASE: TEN YEARS ON AND STILL TRYING TO FIT IN A SYSTEM ......... 237 CASE C-279/08 P COMMISSION V NETHERLANDS ( ' NOX ' ) [2011] PHILIPP WERNER AND MARTIN WORTMANN CHAPTER 18 GIBRALTAR -. A LANDMARK JUDGMENT MISINTERPRETED ................................. 261 CASE C-107/09 P EUROPEAN COMMISSION AND KINGDOM OF SPAIN V GOVERNMENT OF GIBRALTAR AND UNITED KINGDOM ( ' GIBRALTAR ' ) [2011] PIERPAOLO ROSSI-MACCANICO XIII CHAPTER 19 THE EDF CASE: A DISTANT MIRROR ............................................................... 275 CASE C 124/10 P EUROPEAN COMMISSION V ELECTRICITE DE FRANCE ( ' EDF ' ) [2012] BERNHARD VON WENDLAND CHAPTER 20 COMMISSION GUIDELINES AND THEIR LIMITS ................................................ 295 CASE T-304/08 SMURFIT KAPPA V COMMISSION [2012] VINCENT VEROUDEN CHAPTER 21 STATE AID, PUBLIC FUNDING AND INFRASTRUCTURE .......................................... 309 CASE C-288/1 1 P MITTELDEUTSCHE FLUGHAFEN AG, FLUGHAFEN LEIPZIG HALLE GMBH, ESTABLISHED IN LEIPZIG V EUROPEAN COMMISSION ( ' LEIPZIG-HALLE ' ) [2012] ERIKA SZYSZCZAK CHAPTER 22 RYANAIR V COMMISSION-. A TALE OF LOST AND REVIVED OPPORTUNITY .... 331 CASE C-287/12 P RYANAIR V COMMISSION [2013] ELISABETTA RIGHINI AND NATALIA SOLAROVA CHAPTER 23 NEW CHALLENGES FOR THE LEGAL STANDING IN ACTIONS FOR ANNULMENT AFTER THE APPEAL JUDGMENT IN THE CASE DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA .................. 355 CASE C-453/19 P DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA V EUROPEAN COMMISSION [2021] CARLOS DENIZ CESARANO AND CHRISTIAN KOENIG CHAPTER 24 THE BANK BURGENLAND CASE: PRIVATISATIONS REQUIRE THE PHANTOM MARKET OPERATOR TO FORGET ITS CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a ........... 371 JOINED CASES C-242/12 P, C-215/12 P AND C-223/12 P LAND BURGENLAND AND OTHERS V COMMISSION [2013] MICHAEL SCHUETTE CHAPTER 25 MEDIASET III THE RECOVERY REVOLUTION DEACTIVATED ............................... 383 CASE C-69/13 MEDIASET S.P.A. V MINISTERO DELLO SVILUPPO ECONOMICO MASSIMO MEROLA XIV CHAPTER 26 CIUDAD DE LA LUZ JUDGMENT : AN IN-DEPTH REVIEW OF THE MARKET ECONOMY INVESTOR PRINCIPLE .............................................. 409 JOINED CASES T-3 19/12 AND T-32 1/12 KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND OTHERS V EUROPEAN COMMISSION [2014] ADINA. CLAICI CHAPTER 27 EVENTECH T THE NON-SELECTIVE ADVANTAGES OF A BUS LANE POLICY ............. 419 CASE C-5 18/13 EVENTECH V THE PARKING ADJUDICATOR [2015] GREETJE VAN HEEZIK CHAPTER 28 INTERPRETATIVE BOUNDARIES OF EU AND NATIONAL LAW IN CASE OF RES JUDICATA ............................... 441 CASE C-505/14 KLAUSNER HOLZ NIEDERSACHSEN V LAND NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN [2015] PETER STAVICZKY CHAPTER 29 THE USE OF EVENT STUDIES TO ASSESS THE AMOUNT OF AID: SOME LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FRANCE TELECOM CASE .......................... 453 CASE C-486/ 15 P EUROPEAN COMMISSION V FRENCH REPUBLIC AND ORANGE [2016] ALEJANDRO REQUEJO TOVAR CHAPTER 30 UPDATE ON WORLD DUTY FREE GROUP ........................................................... 459 JOINED CASES C-5 1 /19 P AND C-64/ 19 P WORLD DUTY FREE GROUP SA AND SPAIN V COMMISSION [2021] CONOR QUIGLEY QC CHAPTER 31 FIH HOLDING -. THE MARKET ECONOMY OPERATOR PRINCIPLE AS A CONCEPT BASED ON LAW AND ECONOMICS, BUT WHERE THE LAW PREVAILS ........................................................................................... 469 CASE C-579/16 P EUROPEAN COMMISSION V FIH HOLDING AND FIH ERHVERVSBANK ( ' FIH HOLDING ' ) [2018] MAYYGORZATA AGNIESZKA CYNDECKA XV CHAPTER 32 STATE AID, TURNOVER TAXES AND ABILITY TO PAY: TO CUT THE GORDIAN KNOT? .............................................................................................. 493 JOINED CASES T-836/16 AND T-624/17
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a POLAND V COMMISSION [2019] AND CASE C-562/19 P COMMISSION V POLAND [2021] JULIE LEROY AND FRANCESCO CANNAS CHAPTER 33 ANDRES '. THE UNFINISHED BUSINESS OF A SEEMINGLY SELECTIVE NON-ADVANTAGE ........................................................................................... 507 CASE C-203/16 P DIRK ANDRES V EUROPEAN COMMISSION [2018] RAYMOND LUJA CHAPTER 34 SPANISH GOODWILL '. A TEXTBOOK ON MATERIAL SELECTIVITY AWAITING A SECOND EDITION .......................................................................................... 519 JOINED CASES C-53/19 P AND C-65/19 P BANCO SANTANDER AND SANTUSA V COMMISSION [2021] ANDREAS BARTOSCH CHAPTER 35 LOCUS STANDI IN STATE AID LITIGATION AFTER MONTESSORI ............................. 529 JOINED CASES C-622/16 P TO C-624/16 P SCUOLA ELEMENTARE MARIA MONTESSORI V COMMISSION, COMMISSION V SCUOLA ELEMENTARE MARIA MONTESSORI AND COMMISSION V FERRACCI [2018] VALERIE NOEL AND SEBASTIEN THOMAS CHAPTER 36 EESTI PAGAR A FORMALISTIC APPROACH TO INCENTIVE EFFECT AND RECOVERY PROCEDURES ................................................................................... 555 CASE C-349/17 EESTI PAGAR [2019] CAROLINE BUTS AND PETER STAVICZKY CHAPTER 37 STATE AID IN THE FIELD OF ENERGY: THERE AND BACK AGAIN ........................ 577 CASE C-405/16 P GERMANY V COMMISSION [2019] THEODOROS G ILIOPOULOS AND EIRINI GALATSANOU XVI CHAPTER 38 IS THE ASSESSMENT ON THE EFFECT ON TRADE CHANGING? .............................. 593 CASET-728/17 MARINVEST D.O.O. AND PORTING D.O.O. V EUROPEAN COMMISSION [2019] PETER STAVICZKY CHAPTER 39 BMW I COMPATIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND THE TWO FACES OF DISCRETION IN STATE AID LAW ........................................................................................... 617 CASE C-654/17 P BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG AND FREISTAAT SACHSEN V EUROPEAN COMMISSION [2019] PABLO IBAYYEZ COLOMO CHAPTER 40 NELSON ANTUNES DA CUNHA -. THE PRINCIPLE OF EFFECTIVE AND IMMEDIATE RECOVERY IN THE LIGHT OF A NATIONAL
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a LIMITATION PERIOD SHORTER THAN TEN YEARS ................................................................................ 631 CASE C-627/18 NELSON ANTUNES DA CUNHA, LDA V INSTITUTE DE FINANCIAMENTO DA AGRICULTURA E PESCAS IP (IFAP) [2020] PETER STAVICZKY CHAPTER 41 DOVERA-. THE INTERACTION OF EU STATE AID LAW AND SOCIAL PROTECTION ......................................................................................... 641 CASET-216/15 DOVERA ZDRAVOTNA POISYYOVYYA V COMMISSION [2018] AND JOINED CASES C-262/18 P AND C-271/18 P COMMISSION V DOVERA ZDRAVOTNA POISYYOVYYA [2020] JORIS GRUYTERS CHAPTER 42 COMPAGNIE DES PECHES DE SAINT-MALO I QUESTIONS OF PROCEDURE AND SUBSTANCE ................................................................................................ 651 CASE C-212/19 MINISTRE DE L ' AGRICULTURE ET DE I ' ALIMENTATION V COMPAGNIE DES PECHES DE SAINT-MALO [2020] MIHALIS KEKELEKIS, MARIA MUNOZ DE JUAN AND JAAP TILSTRA CHAPTER 43 HINKLEY POINT C: TRIMMING THE SAM, WHILE EXTENDING THE REACH OF WIDER EU LAW INFRINGEMENTS ? ............................................................. 663 CASE C-5 94/18 P AUSTRIA V COMMISSION ( ' HINKLEY POINT C ' ) [2020] LEIGH HANCHER AND ANTONIOS BOUCHAGIAR XVII CHAPTER 44 FIAT, STARBUCKS, APPLE, AMAZON AND ENGIE -. DO INDIVIDUAL TAX RULINGS CONFER A SELECTIVE ADVANTAGE ? .................... 689 JOINED CASES T-L 31/16 ANDT-263/16 BELGIAN EXCESS PROFITS [2019], JOINED CASES T-755/15 ANDT-759/15 FIAT [2019], CASET-760/15 STARBUCKS [2019], JOINED CASES T-778/16 AND T-892/16 APPLE [2020], JOINED CASES T-8 16/17 AND T-3 18/18 AMAZON [2021 ], JOINED CASES T-516/18 ANDT-525/18 ENGIE [2021] AND CASE C-337/19 P BELGIAN EXCESS PROFITS [2021] JOSE LUIS BUENDIA SIERRA AND NIEVES BAYON FERNANDEZ CHAPTER 45 THE RYANAIR COVID-19 STATE AID JUDGMENTS OF THE GENERAL COURT ................................................................................... 715 CASES T-238/20, T-259/20, T-643/20, T-465/20, T-665/20
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a RYANAIR V COMMISSION [2021] JUAN JORGE PIERNAS LOPEZ CHAPTER 46 MILESTONE OR TOMBSTONE ? CLIMATE CHANGE AND STATE AID PROCEDURES - TEMPUS FUGIT ? ....................................................... 741 CASE T-793/14 TEMPUS ENERGY AND TEMPUS ENERGY TECHNOLOGY V COMMISSION [2018] LEIGH HANCHER CHAPTER 47 THE EXCESS PROJIT RULINGS: A CHALLENGING REVIEW OF THE NOTION OF SCHEME ............................................................................ 765 JOINED CASES T-131/16 ANDT-263/16 BELGIUM AND MAGNETROL INTERNATIONAL V COMMISSION [2019] AND CASE C-337/19 P COMMISSION V BELGIUM AND MAGNETROL INTERNATIONAL [2021] MARIANNE CLAYTON AND MARIA J SEGURA INDEX .................................................................................................................... 785 XVIII
|
| 852 |
|
|
|c EG: XIII Bb: 156/2
|m BOOK
|
| 999 |
|
|
|a VRH50
|b MPVRH
|c Institutsbibliothek
|d EG: XIII Bb: 156/2
|e available
|t Verfügbar
|f 1
|g 0
|h N
|i 2
|j BIB
|
