Boards of appeal of EU agencies : towards judicialization of administrative review?
Show duplicates
| Published: | Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2022 |
|---|---|
| Persons: | , , |
| Format: | Book / Printed Book / Conference paper |
| Language: | English |
| Edition: | First edition |
| Physical description: | xxvi, 338 Seiten : Diagramme |
| Item Description: |
"... based on the contributions presented by their authors in an academic conference organized by the Globalisation and Law Network held on 21-22 September 2020 at Maastricht University, Campus Brussels" - Acknowledgements |
| ISBN: | 9780192849298 |
| Classification - More hits on the same topic: | EG: X E = Länder: Europäische Union: Behördenaufbau. |
| record_format |
marc |
|---|---|
| spelling |
Chamon, Merijn <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Boards of appeal of EU agencies towards judicialization of administrative review? edited by Merijn Chamon, Annalisa Volpato, Mariolina Eliantonio First edition Oxford Oxford University Press 2022, 2022 xxvi, 338 Seiten : Diagramme 24 cm Konferenzschrift Volpato, Annalisa <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Eliantonio, Mariolina <<[HerausgeberIn]>> based on the contributions presented by their authors in an academic conference organized by the Globalisation and Law Network held on 21-22 September 2020 at Maastricht University, Campus Brussels" - Acknowledgements Erscheint auch als (Online-Ausgabe): Boards of appeal of EU agencies Eliantonio, M. https://aleph.mpg.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=VRH01&local_base=VRH01&doc_number=001108210&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA ToC Völkerrecht Heidelberg VIEW |
| language |
English |
| format |
0/Buch/ 1/Buch/PrintBuch/ 0/Konferenzschrift/ |
| author |
Chamon, Merijn <<[HerausgeberIn]>> |
| spellingShingle |
Chamon, Merijn <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Boards of appeal of EU agencies : towards judicialization of administrative review? |
| author_facet |
Chamon, Merijn <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Chamon, Merijn <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Volpato, Annalisa <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Eliantonio, Mariolina <<[HerausgeberIn]>> |
| author_role |
- |
| author_sort |
Chamon, Merijn <<[HerausgeberIn]>> |
| author2 |
Chamon, Merijn <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Volpato, Annalisa <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Eliantonio, Mariolina <<[HerausgeberIn]>> |
| author2_role |
- |
| title |
Boards of appeal of EU agencies : towards judicialization of administrative review? |
| title_sub |
towards judicialization of administrative review? |
| title_short |
Boards of appeal of EU agencies |
| title_full |
Boards of appeal of EU agencies towards judicialization of administrative review? edited by Merijn Chamon, Annalisa Volpato, Mariolina Eliantonio |
| title_fullStr |
Boards of appeal of EU agencies towards judicialization of administrative review? edited by Merijn Chamon, Annalisa Volpato, Mariolina Eliantonio |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Boards of appeal of EU agencies towards judicialization of administrative review? edited by Merijn Chamon, Annalisa Volpato, Mariolina Eliantonio |
| title_sort |
boards of appeal of eu agencies : towards judicialization of administrative review? edited by merijn chamon, annalisa volpato, mariolina eliantonio |
| publisher |
Oxford University Press |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| physical |
xxvi, 338 Seiten : Diagramme 24 cm |
| edition |
First edition |
| isbn |
9780192849298 |
| callnumber-first |
EG X E 30 |
| callnumber-subject |
EG |
| callnumber-label |
EG X E 30 |
| callnumber-raw |
EG: X E |
| callnumber-search |
EG: X E EG X E 30 |
| callnumber-sort |
EG |
| genre |
Konferenzschrift |
| genre_facet |
Konferenzschrift |
| url |
https://aleph.mpg.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=VRH01&local_base=VRH01&doc_number=001108210&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| institution |
Local holdings |
| institution_hierarchy |
0/Local holdings/ |
| system_id |
001108210 |
| online |
false |
| dedup_id_str |
ChamonMerijnHerausgeberInBoardsofappealofEUagenciesOxfordUniversityPress |
| toc_content |
BOARDS OF APPEAL OF EU AGENCIES TOWARDS JUDICIALIZATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW? EDITED BY MERIJN CHAMON, ANNALISA VOLPATO, AND MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO PLANCX INSTITUT FUER AUS!, OEFFENTL. RECHT U. VOELKERRECHT V . BIBLIOTHEK J V\ OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS CONTENTS TABLE OF CASES XVII LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS XXVII INTRODUCTION 1 MERIJN CHAMON, ANNALISA VOLPATO, AND MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO 1. BETWEEN ADDED VALUE AND UNTAPPED POTENTIAL: THE BOARDS OF APPEAL IN THE FIELD OF EU FINANCIAL REGULATION 8 MERIJN CHAMON AND DIANE FROMAGE 1.1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.2 THE JOINT BOARD OF APPEAL AND THE APPEAL PANEL: MAIN FEATURES 10 1.2.1 ESTABLISHMENT AND COMPOSITION 10 1.2.2 COMPETENCES OF AND PROCEDURES BEFORE THE JBOA AND THE AP 14 1.3 THE BODY OF DECISIONS ADOPTED BY THE JBO A AND AP 16 1.3.1 GENERAL INFORMATION 17 1.3.2 THE INCREMENTAL CLARIFICATION OF THE SCOPE AND INTENSITY OF THE REVIEWS OF THE JBOA AND AP 18 1.3.2.1 THE INTERPRETATION OF THE APPEALS PRESENTED BEFORE THEM 19 1.3.2.2 THE NOTION OF CHALLENGEABLE ACT 19 1.3.2.3 THE |
| local_classification |
EG: X E |
| id |
001126839 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT chamonmerijnherausgeberin boardsofappealofeuagenciestowardsjudicializationofadministrativereview |
| first_indexed |
2024-05-05T23:44:56Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-05-05T23:44:56Z |
| _version_ |
1799553344353599489 |
| fullrecord |
12828nam 2200469 u 4500001001200000003002700012008003900039007002400078020004000102020001500142090001400157100003900171245015200210250001800362260004800380300004000428655002100468700004200489700004600531041001900577993000800596993000900604500022700613775007300840024001800913024001800931084001200949028003900961998001201000998002101012998001201033696001901045856020901064992199301273992199903266992198605265992198807251992198409239992101911223852002212242999009412264 VR001126839 VRH01000000000000001108210 t s2022 r 1|| eng tu||||||||||||||||||||| a978-0-19-284929-8 chbk. : (£80.00) a0192849298 aEG X E 30 1 aChamon, Merijn <<[HerausgeberIn]>> 00 aBoards of appeal of EU agencies btowards judicialization of administrative review? cedited by Merijn Chamon, Annalisa Volpato, Mariolina Eliantonio aFirst edition aOxford bOxford University Press c2022, 2022 axxvi, 338 Seiten : Diagramme c24 cm aKonferenzschrift 1 aVolpato, Annalisa <<[HerausgeberIn]>> 1 aEliantonio, Mariolina <<[HerausgeberIn]>> 07 aeng 2ISO 639-2 atoc a2207 a"... based on the contributions presented by their authors in an academic conference organized by the Globalisation and Law Network held on 21-22 September 2020 at Maastricht University, Campus Brussels" - Acknowledgements tErscheint auch als (Online-Ausgabe): Boards of appeal of EU agencies 8 a9780192849298 3 a9780192849298 aEG: X E 50 a10.1093/oso/9780192849298.==!.0001 aEG: X E aBehördenaufbau. aEG: X E aEliantonio, M. uhttps://aleph.mpg.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=VRH01&local_base=VRH01&doc_number=001108210&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA 3ToC mVölkerrecht Heidelberg zVIEW aBOARDS OF APPEAL OF EU AGENCIES TOWARDS JUDICIALIZATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW? EDITED BY MERIJN CHAMON, ANNALISA VOLPATO, AND MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO PLANCX INSTITUT FUER AUS!, OEFFENTL. RECHT U. VOELKERRECHT V . BIBLIOTHEK J V\ OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS CONTENTS TABLE OF CASES XVII LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS XXVII INTRODUCTION 1 MERIJN CHAMON, ANNALISA VOLPATO, AND MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO 1. BETWEEN ADDED VALUE AND UNTAPPED POTENTIAL: THE BOARDS OF APPEAL IN THE FIELD OF EU FINANCIAL REGULATION 8 MERIJN CHAMON AND DIANE FROMAGE 1.1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.2 THE JOINT BOARD OF APPEAL AND THE APPEAL PANEL: MAIN FEATURES 10 1.2.1 ESTABLISHMENT AND COMPOSITION 10 1.2.2 COMPETENCES OF AND PROCEDURES BEFORE THE JBOA AND THE AP 14 1.3 THE BODY OF DECISIONS ADOPTED BY THE JBO A AND AP 16 1.3.1 GENERAL INFORMATION 17 1.3.2 THE INCREMENTAL CLARIFICATION OF THE SCOPE AND INTENSITY OF THE REVIEWS OF THE JBOA AND AP 18 1.3.2.1 THE INTERPRETATION OF THE APPEALS PRESENTED BEFORE THEM 19 1.3.2.2 THE NOTION OF CHALLENGEABLE ACT 19 1.3.2.3 THE REQUIREMENTS OF DIRECT AND INDIVIDUAL CONCERN 21 1.3.2.4 THE THRESHOLD FOR SUSPENSION 23 1.3.2.5 THE INTENSITY OF REVIEW EXERCISED BY THE JBOA AND AP 24 1.3.2.6 THE POWER OF THE JBOA AND AP TO REMIT CASES 28 1.4 THE WAY FORWARD 29 1.5 CONCLUSION 32 2. THE BOARDS OF APPEAL OF NETWORKED SERVICES AGENCIES: SPECIALIZED ARBITRATORS OF TRANSNATIONAL REGULATORY CONFLICTS? 34 CARLO TOVO 2.1 THE SPECIFICITIES OF NETWORKED SERVICES AGENCIES AND THEIR REFLECTIONS ON THE FUNCTIONING OF BOAS 34 2.2 THE AUTONOMY AND IMPARTIALITY OF BOAS: FORMAL GUARANTEES AND POTENTIAL RISKS 36 2.3 THE COMPETENCES OF THE BO AS AND THEIR GROWING PROCEDURALIZATION 40 2.4 THE ACTUAL EXERCISE OF THE COMPETENCES OF THE BOAS 45 2.5 THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEW EXERCISED BY THE ACER BOA 48 2.6 THE STANDARD OF CONTROL BY THE ACER BOA: BEYOND LIMITED REVIEW OF COMPLEX TECHNICAL ISSUES 50 YYYYYY CONTENTS 2.7 EXPLORING THE FULL POTENTIAL OF SPECIALIZED ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 54 2.8 CONCLUSION: AN aADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL FOR ARBITRATING TRANSNATIONAL REGULATORY CONFLICTS? 57 3. THE TRAILBLAZERS: THE BOARDS OF APPEAL OF EUIPO AND CPVO 59 DOMINIK HANF 3.1 INTRODUCTION 59 3.2 BACKGROUND 61 3.2.1 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 61 3.2.2 LEGAL BACKGROUND 62 3.3 COMPOSITION AND INDEPENDENCE 66 3.3.1 COMPOSITION 66 3.3.2 INDEPENDENCE 67 3.4 APPEAL PROCEEDINGS 69 3.4.1 REVIEWABLE ACTS AND EXCLUSIONS 69 3.4.2 APPEAL PROCEDURE 70 3.4.3 SCOPE AND INTENSITY OF REVIEW 72 3.4.4 POWERS OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL 75 3.4.5 REFERENCES TO EARLIER DECISIONS TAKEN ON APPEAL 76 3.5 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE GENERAL COURT 76 3.5.1 STANDARD AND INTENSITY OF REVIEW 76 3.5.2 POWER TO ALTER THE DECISION OF THE BOARDS OF APPEAL 78 3.5.3 ROLE OF THE GENERAL COURT 79 3.6 ROLE AND FUNCTION OF THE BOARDS OF APPEAL 80 3.6.1 REVIEW AND FILTERING FUNCTIONS 80 3.6.2 GUIDING FUNCTION 81 3.7 CONCLUSION 83 4. THE BOARD OF APPEAL OF THE EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY AT A CROSSROADS 84 ANNALISA VOLPATO AND ELEONORE MULLIER 4.1 INTRODUCTION 84 4.2 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ECHA BOA 85 4.2.1 THE COMPETENCE OF THE ECHA BOA 85 4.2.2 THE COMPOSITION OFTHE ECHA BOA 87 4.2.3 THE PARTIES BEFORE THE ECHA BOA 88 4.2.4 THE PROCEDURE IN THE APPEAL BEFORE THE ECHA BOA 89 4.2.5 THE ROLE OF THE ECHA BO A AND THE USE OF PRECEDENT 92 4.3 THE REVIEW CONDUCTED BY THE ECHA BOA 94 4.3.1 THE REVIEW BY THE BOA ACCORDING TO THE ECHA BOA 95 4.3.2 THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEW OF THE BOA ACCORDING TO THE COURT 96 4.3.3 INTENSITY OF REVIEW OFTHE BOA ACCORDING TO THE COURT 99 4.3.4 THE REVIEW OF THE ECHA BO A DECISIONS BY THE GENERAL COURT 100 4.4 CONCLUSION 101 YY CONTENTS XIII 5. THE EASA BOARD OF APPEAL IN SEARCH OF IDENTITY: AN EFFECTIVE FILTER BETWEEN ADMINISTRATION AND COURTS? 103 MARTA SIMONCINI AND MICAELA VERISSIMO 5.1 INTRODUCTION 103 5.2 THE DESIGN OF THE EASA BO A 104 5.3 THE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOA 105 5.3.1 THE COMPETENCE OF THE BOA 106 5.3.2 THE LEGAL EFFECTS OF THE DECISIONS OF THE BOA 109 5.4 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADMINISTRATIVE AND aJUDICIAL REVIEW 111 5.4.1 SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW 112 5.4.2 PROCEDURAL REVIEW 115 5.5 THE ADDED VALUE OF THE EASA BOA. A FIRST ASSESSMENT 116 5.6 CONCLUSIONS 119 6. HIDDEN ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW IN EU LAW: THE BO AS OF EU AGENCIES IN THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY 122 GRAHAM BUTLER 6.1 INTRODUCTION 122 6.2 THE EU AGENCIES ESTABLISHED ON A CFSP LEGAL BASIS 124 6.3 THE BOAS OF EU AGENCIES 128 6.4 THE BO AS OF EU AGENCIES IN THE CFSP 130 6.4.1 EUROPEAN DEFENCE AGENCY (EDA) APPEALS BOARD 131 6.4.2 EUROPEAN UNION SATELLITE CENTRE (SATCEN) APPEALS BOARD 133 6.4.3 EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTE FOR SECURITY STUDIES (EUISS) APPEALS BOARD 135 6.4.4 WESTERN EUROPEAN UNION (WEU) APPEALS BOARD 136 6.5 THE BOASOFEU AGENCIES WITHIN THE CFSP: A DISMISSAL FAILURE 139 6.5.1 SECONDARY LAW ATTEMPTING TO HALT JUDICIAL REVIEW 140 6.5.2 COMPOSITION, QUALIFICATIONS, AND INDEPENDENCE 142 6.5.3 REFORMS TO THE STATUTE OF THE COURT 145 6.5.4 ABOLISHING THE BOARDS OF APPEAL (AND THE AGENCIES) 147 6.6 CONCLUSION 149 7. FRONTEX: GREAT POWERS BUT NO APPEALS 151 MARCO STEFAN AND LEONHARD DEN HERTOG 7.1 INTRODUCTION 151 7.2 A ' SUPER-AGENCY WITH FRAGMENTED ACCOUNTABILITY ISSUES 153 7.3 THE COMPLAINT MECHANISM OF FRONTEX 157 7.3.1 WHOSE COMPLAINTS? 160 7.3.2 WHOSE ASSESSMENT AND WHICH FOLLOW-UP? 161 7.3.3 THE REMEDIES? 163 7.4 THE ' SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTING SYSTEM ' 165 7.5 CONCLUSIONS 170 XIV CONTENTS 8. THE BOARDS OF APPEAL AS HYBRID ADJUDICATORS: ON SOME SHORTCOMINGS OF ARTICLE 58A OF THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 175 LUCA DE LUCIA 8.1 INTRODUCTION 175 8.2 LEGAL REGIME OF THE BOAS SET UP WITHIN THE EUIPO, CPVO, ECHA, AND EASA 176 8.2.1 THE BOAS OF EUIPO AND THE CPVO 176 8.2.2 THE BOAS OF ECHA AND EASA 181 8.3 ARTICLE 58A OF THE STATUTE OF THE CJEU 184 8.4 QUESTIONS REGARDING THE SCOPE OF THE 2019 REFORM 187 8.5 SPECIFIC PROBLEMS RAISED BY ARTICLE 58A 188 8.5.1 PROBLEMS THAT COULD BE SOLVED BY THE GENERAL COURT 189 8.5.2 POSSIBLE LEGISLATIVE CORRECTIONS a192 8.6 CONCLUSION 193 9. RETHINKING THE POSITION OF THE BOARDS OF APPEAL FROM A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE 195 SOFIE OOSTERHUIS AND ROB WIDDERSHOVEN 9.1 INTRODUCTION 195 9.2 THE HYBRID NATURE OF BOAS AS A LEGAL PROBLEM 196 9.3 ADMINISTRATIVE PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES WITHIN EUROPE AS BENCHMARK 199 9.3.1 INTRODUCTION 199 9.3.2 UK TRIBUNAL SYSTEM 200 9.3.2.1 ORIGIN AND FUNCTION 200 9.3.2.2 INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN 201 9.3.2.3 SCOPE AND STANDARD OF REVIEW 202 9.3.2.4 REMEDIES AND RELATIONS WITH THE ORDINARY COURTS 203 9.3.2.5 CONCLUSION 205 9.3.3 INTRA-ADMINISTRATIVE OBJECTION PROCEDURE 205 9.3.3.1 ORIGIN AND FUNCTION 205 9.3.3.2 INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN 207 9.3.3.3 SCOPE AND STANDARD OF REVIEW 207 9.3.3.4 REMEDIES AND RELATIONS WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 209 9.3.4 CONCLUSION 209 9.4 REPOSITIONING THE BO AS 210 9.4.1 POSITION BEFORE THE REFORM OF ARTICLE 58A 210 9.4.2 POSITION AFTER THE REFORM OF ARTICLE 58A 211 9.4.3 HOW TO PROCEED FROM HERE? 212 9.5 FROM BOAS TO SPECIALIZED TRIBUNALS 213 9.5.1 INDEPENDENCE 213 9.5.2 ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK 216 9.5.3 REMEDIES 218 9.6 CONCLUSION 220 1 CONTENTS XV 10. WHO LITIGATES BEFORE THE BOARDS OF APPEAL? 221 LAURA MUZI 10.1 AIMS OF THIS CHAPTER AND METHODOLOGY 221 10.2 GENERAL FEATURES OF ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW MECHANISMS 222 10.2.1 CHANGING ROLE IN CONNECTION TO THE JUDICIAL PROTECTION 223 10.3 VARIABLES 225 10.4 SELECTION CRITERIA 227 10.4.1 THE AGENCIES AND BOAS SELECTED IN THE SAMPLE 227 10.4.1.1 CPVOBOA 228 10.4.1.2 ECHABOA 229 10.4.1.3 THE JBOA OF THE ESAS 230 10.4.2 TIMEFRAME AND NATURE OF THE DECISIONS 231 10.5 APPELLANTS 231 10.6 INTERVENERS 233 10.7 OUTCOME OF APPEALS 235 10.8 GROUNDS FOR PLEAS 238 10.9 CONCLUDING REMARKS 242 11. THE POSITION OF BOARDS OF APPEAL: BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL CONTINUITY AND INDEPENDENCE 245 JACOPO ALBERTI 11.1 INTRODUCTION 245 11.2 FUNCTIONAL CONTINUITY AND INDEPENDENCE: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 247 11.2.1 A NARROW UNDERSTANDING OF'FUNCTIONAL CONTINUITY ' AND ITS COMPATIBILITY WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF aINDEPENDENCE 247 11.2.2 A BROAD UNDERSTANDING OF ' FUNCTIONAL CONTINUITY ' AND ITS TROUBLED, YET NOT IMPOSSIBLE, RELATION WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF INDEPENDENCE 250 11.3 THE DEGREE OF INDEPENDENCE OF THE BO AS OF EU AGENCIES: A GENERAL OVERVIEW 252 11.3.1 FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE 258 11.3.2 PERSONAL INDEPENDENCE 259 11.3.3 FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE 260 11.3.4 APPOINTMENT OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS 261 11.3.5 REMOVAL OF MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS 262 11.4 FROM AN ADMINISTRATIVE TO A JUDICIAL LITIGATION? ASSESSING GERMANY V ECHA 264 11.5 BOAS OF EU AGENCIES IN TRANSITION: ENHANCING THEIR INDEPENDENCE, RESPECTING THEIR PECULIARITY 268 11.5.1 SOME CAVEATS BEFORE TACKLING A REFORM OF THE INSTITUTIONAL POSITION OF THE BOARDS 268 11.5.2 THE MAIN ARGUMENTS IN FAVOUR OF SUCH A REFORM AND ITS SCOPE 269 11.6 CONCLUSION 272 12. JUDICIAL AND EXTRA-JUDICIAL REVIEW: THE QUEST FOR EPISTEMIC CERTAINTY 273 MICHAL KRAJEWSKI 12.1 INTRODUCTION 273 XVI CONTENTS 12.2 EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY AND THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF DISCRETION 275 12.3 THE EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL AND EXTRA-JUDICIAL REVIEW IN RESPONSE TO EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY 277 12.4 PROCEDURAL MODEL: A SILENT ARBITER OR AN ACTIVE INQUISITOR? 279 12.5 UNCERTAINTY ON TRIAL BEFORE THE EU COURTS 283 12.5.1 KEEPING SCIENCE AT ARMS LENGTH 283 12.5.2 JUDGES LEARNING ECONOMICS ... AND AVIONICS? 288 12.6 THE BOARDS OF APPEAL: REVIEW OR SECOND-GUESSING? 289 12.6.1 THE LIMITS OF THE LEGALIZATION OF SCIENCE 289 12.6.2 REVIEWING EXPERT ' GUT FEELING ' 293 12.7 CONCLUSION 296 13. BOARDS OF APPEAL OF EU AGENCIES AND ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER: UNEASY BEDFELLOWS? 299 DOMINIQUE RITLENG 13.1 INTRODUCTION 299 13.2 THE APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER TO BOARDS OF APPEAL 300 13.2.1 THE ADMINISTRATIVE NATURE OF THE BOARDS OF APPEAL 301 13.2.2 THE INAPPLICABILITY OF THE RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL REMEDY TO THE BOARDS OF APPEAL 306 13.2.3 AN ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY CANNOT REPLACE A JUDICIAL REMEDY 309 13.3 THE CONTRIBUTION OF BOARDS OF APPEAL aTO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE REMEDY OF ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER 310 13.3.1 THE PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS APPLICABLE TO THE BOARDS OF APPEAL 311 13.3.2 BOARDS OF APPEAL IN SUPPORT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JUDICIAL PROTECTION 315 13.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY AS A PRECONDITION FOR JUDICIAL REMEDY AND ARTICLE 47 OF THE CHARTER 317 13.5 CONCLUSION 319 CONCLUSION 321 MERIJN CHAMON, ANNALISA VOLPATO, AND MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO THE BOARDS OF APPEAL - INSTITUTIONAL FEATURES 323 THE NATURE OF THE BOARDS OF APPEAL 323 PART OF AN INTEGRATED SYSTEM OF LEGAL PROTECTION 32 5 THE INTRODUCTION OF ARTICLE 58A IN THE STATUTE OF THE CJEU - AN ILL-CONSIDERED REFORM? 326 THE ELUSIVE NOTION OF FUNCTIONAL CONTINUITY 32 7 THE BOARDS OF APPEAL - FUNCTIONING 328 THE WHAT AND THE WHO - CHALLENGEABLE ACTS AND LITIGANTS 328 THE HOW - UNFULFILLED PROMISE OF MORE INTENSE REVIEW BY THE BOARDS OF APPEAL 329 THE REMEDY OFFERED BY BOARDS OF APPEAL - THEORY VS PRACTICE 331 THE FUTURE OF THE BOARDS OF APPEAL 332 INDEX 335 1 cEG: X E: 30 mBOOK aVRH50 bMPVRH cInstitutsbibliothek dEG: X E: 30 eavailable tVerfügbar f1 g0 hN i2 jBIB ki |