Energy arbitration and judicial dispute settlement : proceedings of the 4th Athens Conference on European Energy Law

Table of Contents

Bibliographic Details
Published:	Berlin ; Bern ; Bruxelles ; New York ; Oxford ; Warszawa ; Wien : Peter Lang, 2021
Persons:	Mohr, Jochen <<[HerausgeberIn]>> -, Metaxas, Antōnēs <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
Organization:	Athens Conference on European Energy Law <4., 2019, Athen>
Format:	Book / Printed Book / Conference paper
Language:	English
Series:	Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Energie- und Regulierungsrecht Berlin ; Band 72
Physical description:	246 Seiten
ISBN:	9783631815885
Classification - More hits on the same topic:	EG: XIII Ge = Länder: Europäische Union: Energierecht.

record_format	marc
spelling	Mohr, Jochen <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Athens Conference on European Energy Law <4., 2019, Athen> <<[VerfasserIn]>> Energy arbitration and judicial dispute settlement proceedings of the 4th Athens Conference on European Energy Law Berlin ; Bern ; Bruxelles ; New York ; Oxford ; Warszawa ; Wien Peter Lang 2021], 2021 246 Seiten 21 cm x 14.8 cm, 399 g Konferenzschrift Metaxas, Antōnēs <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Energie- und Regulierungsrecht Berlin Band 72 VR000976645 Erscheint auch als (Online-Ausgabe): Mohr, Jochen: Energy Arbitration and Judicial Dispute Settlement Erscheint auch als (Online-Ausgabe): Säcker, Franz Jürgen: Energy Arbitration and Judicial Dispute Settlement Conference on European Energy Law <4., 2019, Athen> Metaxas, A. Metaxas, Antonis https://aleph.mpg.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=VRH01&local_base=VRH01&doc_number=001076003&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA ToC Völkerrecht Heidelberg VIEW
language	English
format	0/Buch/ 1/Buch/PrintBuch/ 0/Konferenzschrift/
author	Mohr, Jochen <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
spellingShingle	Mohr, Jochen <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Energy arbitration and judicial dispute settlement : proceedings of the 4th Athens Conference on European Energy Law Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Energie- und Regulierungsrecht Berlin VR000976645
author_facet	Mohr, Jochen <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Mohr, Jochen <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Metaxas, Antōnēs <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
author_role	-
author_sort	Mohr, Jochen <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
author2	Mohr, Jochen <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Metaxas, Antōnēs <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
author2_role	-
title	Energy arbitration and judicial dispute settlement : proceedings of the 4th Athens Conference on European Energy Law
title_sub	proceedings of the 4th Athens Conference on European Energy Law
title_short	Energy arbitration and judicial dispute settlement
title_full	Energy arbitration and judicial dispute settlement proceedings of the 4th Athens Conference on European Energy Law
title_fullStr	Energy arbitration and judicial dispute settlement proceedings of the 4th Athens Conference on European Energy Law
title_full_unstemmed	Energy arbitration and judicial dispute settlement proceedings of the 4th Athens Conference on European Energy Law
title_sort	energy arbitration and judicial dispute settlement : proceedings of the 4th athens conference on european energy law
series	Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Energie- und Regulierungsrecht Berlin VR000976645
publisher	Peter Lang
publishDate	2021
physical	246 Seiten 21 cm x 14.8 cm, 399 g
isbn	9783631815885
callnumber-first	EG XIII Ge 160
callnumber-subject	EG
callnumber-label	EG XIII GE 160
callnumber-raw	EG: XIII GE
callnumber-search	EG: XIII GE EG XIII Ge 160
callnumber-sort	EG
genre	Konferenzschrift
genre_facet	Konferenzschrift
url	https://aleph.mpg.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=VRH01&local_base=VRH01&doc_number=001076003&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
illustrated	Not Illustrated
institution	Local holdings
institution_hierarchy	0/Local holdings/
system_id	001076003
online	false
dedup_id_str	MohrJochenHerausgeberInEnergyarbitrationandjudicialdisputesettlementPeterLang
toc_content	C, C : JOCHEN MOHR / ANTONIS METAXAS (EDS.) ENERGY ARBITRATION AND JUDICIAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH ATHENS CONFERENCE ON EUROPEAN ENERGY LAW CONTENTS PROF. DR. JOCHEN MOHR & DR. KONSTANTINA BOURAZERI, LL.M. 1 THE IMPACT OF ACHMEA AND CETA ON INVESTMENT ARBITRATION ...................... 15 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 15 1 THE ACHMEA RULING OF THE ECJ ......................................................... 19 1.1 SUBJECT .................................................................................... 19 1.2 KEY STATEMENTS ....................................................................... 20 1.3 LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ................................................................ 22 2 OPINION 1/17 OF THE ECJ ON THE CETA AGREEMENT ......................... 24 2.1 SUBJECT .................................................................................... 24 2.2 KEY STATEMENTS ............................
local_classification	EG: XIII Ge
hierarchy_parent_id	000976645
id	001094611
is_hierarchy_id	001094611
is_hierarchy_title	Energy arbitration and judicial dispute settlement : proceedings of the 4th Athens Conference on European Energy Law
work_keys_str_mv	AT mohrjochenherausgeberin energyarbitrationandjudicialdisputesettlementproceedingsofthe4thathensconferenceoneuropeanenergylaw
first_indexed	2024-05-05T23:44:18Z
last_indexed	2024-05-05T23:44:18Z
_version_	1799500355168370688
fullrecord	19152nam 2200553 ub4500001001200000003002700012008003900039007002400078020008200102020001800184090001900202100003700221110008100258245012000339260009400459300003900553655002100592700004300613041001900656993000800675993001700683490009000700830001600790775010600806775011600912028002901028028002901057024001801086024001801104084001601122998001601138998001801154998001601172697005601188696001601244696002101260856020901281992196101490992197503451992199905426992199807425992199509423992197111418992199413389992198515383992110417368852002718472999009918499VR001094611VRH01000000000000001076003t s2021 r 1\|\| engtu\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\| a978-3-631-81588-5c: EUR 54.95 (DE), EUR 55.00 (AT), CHF 65.00 (freier Preis) a3-631-81588-3 aEG XIII Ge 1601 aMohr, Jochen <<[HerausgeberIn]>> aAthens Conference on European Energy Law <4., 2019, Athen> <<[VerfasserIn]>>00aEnergy arbitration and judicial dispute settlementbproceedings of the 4th Athens Conference on European Energy Law aBerlin ; Bern ; Bruxelles ; New York ; Oxford ; Warszawa ; WienbPeter Langc[2021], 2021 a246 Seitenc21 cm x 14.8 cm, 399 g aKonferenzschrift1 aMetaxas, Antōnēs <<[HerausgeberIn]>>07aeng2ISO 639-2 atoc a2107 21ausSW0 aVeröffentlichungen des Instituts für Energie- und Regulierungsrecht BerlinvBand 72 0aVR000976645 tErscheint auch als (Online-Ausgabe): Mohr, Jochen: Energy Arbitration and Judicial Dispute Settlement tErscheint auch als (Online-Ausgabe): Säcker, Franz Jürgen: Energy Arbitration and Judicial Dispute Settlement50a<<Bestellnummer>> 28158800a<<Bestellnummer>> 2815888 a97836318158853 a9783631815885 aEG: XIII Ge aEG: XIII Ge aEnergierecht. aEG: XIII Ge aConference on European Energy Law <4., 2019, Athen> aMetaxas, A. aMetaxas, Antonis uhttps://aleph.mpg.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=VRH01&local_base=VRH01&doc_number=001076003&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA3ToCmVölkerrecht HeidelbergzVIEW aC, C : JOCHEN MOHR / ANTONIS METAXAS (EDS.) ENERGY ARBITRATION AND JUDICIAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH ATHENS CONFERENCE ON EUROPEAN ENERGY LAW CONTENTS PROF. DR. JOCHEN MOHR & DR. KONSTANTINA BOURAZERI, LL.M. 1 THE IMPACT OF ACHMEA AND CETA ON INVESTMENT ARBITRATION ...................... 15 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 15 1 THE ACHMEA RULING OF THE ECJ ......................................................... 19 1.1 SUBJECT .................................................................................... 19 1.2 KEY STATEMENTS ....................................................................... 20 1.3 LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ................................................................ 22 2 OPINION 1/17 OF THE ECJ ON THE CETA AGREEMENT ......................... 24 2.1 SUBJECT .................................................................................... 24 2.2 KEY STATEMENTS ....................................................................... 24 2.3 LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ................................................................ 25 3 INVESTMENT PROTECTION UNDER THE ENERGY CHARTER TREATY AND ECJ JURISPRUDENCE IN ACHMEA AND CETA ................................................. 26 3.1 OVERVIEW OF THE ENERGY CHARTER TREATY .................................. 26 3.2 EFFECTS OF ACHMEA AND CETA JURISPRUDENCE ON INVESTMENT ARBITRATION BASED ON THE ENERGY CHARTER TREATY .............................. 27 CONCLUSION IN THESES ................................................................................ 30 PROF. DR. ANTONIS METAXAS 2 SAFEGUARDING THE AUTONOMY OF EU LAW: THE IMPACT OF ISDS MECHANISMS AFTER OPINION 1/17 .............................................................. 31 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 31 1. THE CONCEPT OF AUTONOMY a................................................................. 33 2. THE FUNDAMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMY IN THE LIGHT OF OPINION 1/17 ................................................................................. 35 2.1 ALLOCATION OF COMPETENCES .................................................. 35 2.2 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PRELIMINARY REFERENCE PROCEDURE .... 37 2.3 CONTROL OVER THE UNIFORM APPLICATION OF EU LAW .................. 42 3. EVALUATING THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMY AFTER OPINION 1/17 ............. 44 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................... 46 8 CONTENTS WIEGAND LAUBENSTEIN 3 JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES IN THE ENERGY SECTOR IN GERMANY ........... 49 1 THE HISTORY OF GERMAN REGULATORY LAW ............................................ 49 2 HIGHER REGIONAL COURT OF DUESSELDORF ............................................... 52 3 THE LICHTBLICK CASE ............................................................................. 53 4 INCENTIVE REGULATION OF THE NETWORK OPERATORS - THE X-FACTOR ........ 54 4.1 RELEVANT OBSERVATION PERIOD STUETZINTERVALL ........................... 57 4.2 ANALOGUE APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS ABOUT INDIVIDUAL EFFICIENCY . 57 5 POLAND WINS OPAL GAS PIPELINE DISPUTE BEFORE EU COURT .............. 58 5.1 THE FACTS ................................................................................. 58 5.2 FURTHER PROCEDURE ................................................................. 61 THEODOROS GALANIS 4 MULTILATERAL INVESTMENT COURT - AN ALTERNATIVE TO ENERGY DISPUTES .......... 63 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 63 1 MAIN CRITICISM ADDRESSED TO ISDS ..................................................... 65 2 THE NEW MULTILATERAL APPROACH ......................................................... 67 3 THE MULTILATERAL INVESTMENT COURT a................................................... 72 4 BASIC FEATURES OF MIC - THE COUNCIL MANDATE ................................... 73 5 CRITICAL ISSUES - SOME REFLECTIONS ...................................................... 74 5.1 CRITICAL ISSUES - SOME ANSWERS ............................................... 76 CONCLUDING REMARKS .................................................................................... 79 AGIS CHR. GEORGIADES 5 ENERGY DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AFTER ACHMEA AND OPINION 1/17 ......................... 81 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 81 1 DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN BILATERAL AND MULTI-LATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES .... 82 2 ENERGY CHARTER TREATY ....................................................................... 83 3 THE ACHMEA CASE ................................................................................ 83 3.1 THE ARGUMENTS OF SLOVAKIA AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION .. 84 3.2 CJEU ON ACHMEA .................................................................... 85 CONTENTS 9 4 OPINION 1/17 OF THE CJEU ON CETA ................................................. 87 5 THE PREVAILING INTERPRETATION OF ACHMEA ........................................ 88 6 CRITICISM AGAINST ACHMEA ................................................................ 90 7 ADEQUACY OF EU RESPONSE ............................................................... 92 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................... 92 LOUISE BOUVERY 6 THE USE OF TECHNICALLY BASED ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS IN OIL & GAS CONTRACTS .......................................................... 95 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 95 1 THE NEW METHODS: TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES, DISPUTE REVIEW BOARDS, SOLE EXPERT DETERMINATION ...................................... a97 1.1 GENERAL CHARACTERS OF THE MECHANISMS .................................. 97 1.1.1 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES ........................... 97 1.1.2 DRBS ..................................................................... 99 1.1.3 SOLE EXPERT DETERMINATION ................................. 100 1.2 DISPUTE PREVENTION ............................................................... 103 2 INTERACTION BETWEEN ARBITRATION AND THE UNCONVENTIONAL ADRMS ..... 104 2.1 UNCONVENTIONAL ADRMS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ARBITRATION ..... 104 2.2 UNCONVENTIONAL ADRMS AS A PRIOR STEP TO ARBITRATION ......... 107 3 CONSIDERING A MULTI-TIERED DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE ......................... 109 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................. ILL DR. ANNA PLEVRI 7 DISPUTE SETTLEMENT RESOLUTION MECHANISM IN THE GREEK CURRENT EXPLORATION LICENSING ROUNDS ................................................................. 113 1 DISPUTES ARISING OUT OF THE EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION OF HYDROCARBONS AND ARBITRATION ............................................................ 113 2 LATEST DEVELOPMENTS IN THE GREEK FRAMEWORK OF EXPLORATION LICENSING ROUNDS ................................................................................. 118 10 CONTENTS 3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK OF EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION OF HYDROCARBONS IN GREECE .................................................................. 120 3.1 LAW 2289/1995 (HYDROCARBONS LAW) AS AMENDED BY LAW 4001/2011 ................................................................................. 120 3.2 PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO 127/1996 AND DRAFT MODEL LEASE AGREEMENT ............................................................................... 123 4 CALLS FOR INTERNATIONAL TENDERS FOR THE RIGHT OF EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION OF HYDROCARBONS IN AREAS OF GREECE ............................ 125 5 LAWS 4524/2018,4525/2018 4526/2018 AND 4527/2018 ON THE RATIFICATION OF LEASE aAGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE GREEK STATE AND VARIOUS ENERGY COMPANIES ON THE GRANT OF THE RIGHT TO EXPLORE AND EXPLOIT HYDROCARBONS IN VARIOUS LANDS OR MARINE AREAS IN GREECE . 127 5.1 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES ............................................................... 128 6 VARIATIONS OF LAW 4525/2018 ON ISSUES OF THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT RESOLUTION MECHANISM ..................................................................... 130 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................. 132 MICHALIS MATHIOULAKIS 8 THE ROLE OF LEGAL DISPUTES AND ARBITRATION IN EU ' S ENERGY SECURITY: THE CASE OF NATURAL GAS NETWORKS ............................................ 135 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 135 1 THE ROLE OF LEGAL DISPUTES AND ARBITRATION IN NATURAL GAS IMPORTS FOR THE EUROPEAN ENERGY SECURITY .................................................... 136 2 DISPUTES AND ARBITRATION OVER GAS IMPORTS IN EUROPE .......................... 137 2.1 THE OPAL CASE ...................................................................... 137 2.2 GAZPROM PGNIG ARBITRATION .............................................. 139 2.3 GAZPROM EUROPEAN COMMISSION NOTICE OF DISPUTE .......... 140 2.4 GAZPROM NAFTOGAZ ARBITRATION .......................................... 142 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 145 SOFIA MICHELAKI 9 CLAIMS OF USERS CONCERNING CAPACITY CHARGES OF NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM. CASE LAW ............................................................ 147 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 147 1 RECENT ARBITRATION CASES REGARDING CAPACITY CHARGES ........................ 148 CONTENTS 11 2 LEGAL ANALYSIS .................................................................................. 149 2.1 aLEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ....................................................... 149 2.2 FACTUAL BACKGROUND WITH REGARD TO THE CASE ....................... 150 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 153 PETER MUSSAEUS & ADRIANE MONCH 10 GERMANY ' S ELECTRICITY PRICE ZONES AND THEIR DELINEATIONS ........................ 155 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 155 1 THE GENERAL COURT ' S DECISION ON CAPACITY BOOKINGS ................. 156 2 PHASING OUT OF COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS ........................................ 157 3 THE ENERGY CHARTER TREATY ........................................................ 158 4 ELECTRICITY PRICE ZONES .................................................................. 159 4.1 THE PROBLEM OF LOOP-FLOWS ............................................... 160 4.2 THE NEW ARTICLE 14 REGULATION (EU) 2019/943 ................. 163 5 A CONFLICT WITH 3A STROMNZV ? ................................................. 165 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................. 167 ALEXIA TROKOUDI & EMMANOUIL CHOURMOUSIS 11 THE GENERAL COURT ' S DECISION OF 15 NOVEMBER 2018 CASE T-793/14 FOR THE ANNULMENT OF THE EC DECISION OF 23 JULY 2014 CASE S. 35980 ON THE CAPACITY MECHANISM IN THE UK ........................... 169 INTRODUCTORY NOTE ..................................................................................... 170 1 COMMISSION ' S DECISION C 2014 5083 APPROVING THE UK CAPACITY MECHANISM ............................................................................ 170 1.1 THE MECHANISM ................................................................ 170 1.2 COMMISSION ' S ASSESSMENT ................................................ 172 1.3 THE JUDGMENT OF THE EU GENERAL COURT ........................... 172 2 PROCEDURAL STEPS aBEFORE THE COURT - ADMISSIBILITY OF THE ACTION ........ 173 3 COURT ' S LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS ON THE SUBSTANCE OF THE CASE ........... 173 3.1 CONCEPT OF DOUBTS ............................................................ 173 3.2 LENGTH OF DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN THE COMMISSION AND THE UK . 174 12 CONTENTS 3.3 ASSESSMENT OF THE DSR ROLE IN THE UK CAPACITY MARKET .. 175 3.4 DISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT OF DSR IN THE UK CAPACITY MARKET ..... 175 4 THE PROCEDURAL EVENTS FOLLOWING THE ANNULMENT OF THE UK CAPACITY MECHANISM ........................................................................ 177 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................. 178 DR. MARIA LYKIDI 12 ARBITRATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS ......................... 179 1 MAIN ISSUES RESULTING IN ARBITRATION IN THE NUCLEAR SECTOR .......... 179 2 CONSTRUCTION ARBITRATION IN THE NUCLEAR SECTOR - THE CASE OF EPR ...... 182 2.1 OLKILUOTO OL3 FINLAND ................................................ 185 2.2 FLAMANVILLE FRANCE ....................................................... 186 2.3 HINKLEY POINT UNITED KINGDOM ................................... 187 3 EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE ' S DECISION ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF LIFETIME PROLONGATION OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS - THE CASE OF BELGIUM AND THE NETHERLANDS .......................................................... 191 ALEXANDROS CHATZINERANTZIS 13 CLIMATE-CHANGE RELATED DISPUTES - OVERVIEW AND TRENDS ........................ 195 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 195 RANGE OF CLIMATE-RELATED DISPUTES ......................................................... 196 1 CLIMATE ENFORCEMENT DISPUTES ................................................... 196 1.1 CASES BROUGHT FORWARD AGAINST GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TO CHANGE CLIMATE POLICY AND CONDUCT .................................................... 197 1.2 CASES BROUGHT aFORWARD TO SEEK DAMAGES FOR FINANCIAL REDRESS ...... 199 2 COMMERCIAL LITIGATION AND ARBITRATION ...................................... 201 3 INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION ............................................................ 202 4 INVESTOR AND D&O CLAIMS ............................................................ 204 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................. 206 CONTENTS 13 PROF. DR. MATTHIAS KNAUFF, LL.M. EUR. 14 REPRESENTATIVE ACTIONS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR ......................................... 207 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS ............................................................................ 207 1 REPRESENTATIVE ACTIONS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS ......... 208 1.1 DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 208 1.2 DESIGN .............................................................................. 209 1.3 THE PROBLEM OF PRECLUSION ................................................. 211 2 PROPOSAL FOR A DIRECTIVE ON REPRESENTATIVE ACTIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE COLLECTIVE INTERESTS OF CONSUMERS ......................... 214 2.1 SCOPE .................................................................................. 216 2.2 DESIGN ................................................................................ 217 2.3 CONSEQUENCES FOR THE ENERGY SECTOR ................................. 221 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................ 222 DR. ATHINA MORAITI 15 CONSUMER PROTECTION AND THE RIGHT TO OUT-OF-COURT DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE OIL & GAS SECTOR. REGULATOR OR OMBUDSMAN MODEL FOR ENERGY ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN EUROPE? ........ 223 1 CONSUMER RIGHTS AND PROTECTION ............................................... 223 2 OIL & GAS INDUSTRY DISPUTES ....................................................... 229 3 TYPES OF DISPUTES - UNDER EXAMINATION ONLY DISPUTES aBETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND OIL & GAS COMPANIES ............................................. 230 4 METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION .................................................. 230 5 OMBUDSMAN - MEDIATION ......................................................... 232 6 REGULATORS ' SPECIAL COMPETENCES TO RESOLVE DISPUTES ................. 233 7 WHICH IS THE BEST MODEL FOR EUROPE TO ADOPT IN OIL & GAS DISPUTES? ......................................................................................... 237 14 CONTENTS DR. KYRIAKOS P. PAPANIKOLAOU 16 ENERGY INVESTMENTS UNDER CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES: EMERGING GAPS AND NECESSITIES IN ARBITRATION ........................................................... 239 1 LONG-TERM ENERGY CONTRACTS UNDER A CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES . 239 2 THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN REBUS SIC STANTIBUS AND FORCE MAJEURE . 240 3 REBUS SIC STANTIBUS VS. PACTA SUNT SERVANDA ............................... 241 4 THE RELUCTANCE OF ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS TO APPLY THE PRINCIPLE REBUS SIC STANTIBUS .................................................................................... 243 1 cEG: XIII Ge: 160mBOOK aVRH50bMPVRHcInstitutsbibliothekdEG: XIII Ge: 160eavailabletVerfügbarf1g0hNi4jBIBki