Does Article 15 ECHR still matter in military operations abroad? : The UK government's 'presumption to derogate' - much ado about nothing?

Full description
Bibliographic Details
Published:Heidelberg : Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, 2019
Persons: Spieker, Luke Dimitrios <<[VerfasserIn]>> -
Format: Book / E-Book
Language:English
Series:MPIL research paper series ; no. 2019, 02
Physical description:1 Online-Ressource (16 Seiten)
Item Description:
Gesehen am 25.02.2019
Classification - More hits on the same topic:VR: XV Fed = Völkerrecht: Europarat: Europäische Menschenrechts-Konvention. Gerichtshof & Kommission. Europäische Sozialcharta:
record_format marc
fullrecord 02434nmm 2200301 ub4500001001200000003002700012008003900039007002400078100004600102245016600148260010700314300003500421520126000456041001901716993000901735993000801744993001001752997001101762490004501773830001601818500002601834856009901860084001501959998001501974998010701989998001502096696002102111VR001052072VRH01000000000000001033521 s2019 ||| engcr|||||||||||||||||||||1 aSpieker, Luke Dimitrios <<[VerfasserIn]>>00aDoes Article 15 ECHR still matter in military operations abroad?bThe UK government's 'presumption to derogate' - much ado about nothing?cLuke Dimitrios Spieker aHeidelbergbMax Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Lawc[10 Jan 2019], 2019 a1 Online-Ressource (16 Seiten) aMuch has been written on the UKs presumption to derogate from the ECHR in military operations abroad. Unfortunately, the inquiry of the Joint Committee on Human Rights on the proposed derogation launched end of 2016 had to close due to general elections and was regrettably not reopened since. Thus, the presumption to derogate still lacks a final assessment. Although the Committee received submission from leading scholars in the field, the implications of the ECtHRs judgement in Hassan were not at the heart of the discussion. Therefore, this contribution will put the spotlight on this seminal decision and argue that it effectively deprives Art. 15 of any purpose in deployed operations. The ECtHR seems to have developed a new standard the standard of arbitrariness in case of genuine norm conflicts between the ECHR and other international regimes, allowing to lower the ECHRs standard of protection to a mere minimum. This means: the UKs presumption to derogate will have practically no impact. Thus, much ado about nothing? Not quite. Hassan did not concern non-international armed conflicts. Although I argue that it is possible to transfer the verdict to these types of conflicts, it remains to be seen how the ECtHR will decide in this matter07aeng2ISO 639-2 a1902 apdf aebook aonline0 aMPIL research paper seriesvno. 2019, 02 0aVR001016025 aGesehen am 25.02.2019a qpdfuhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3313658xVerlagzKostenfrei3Volltext aVR: XV Fed aVR: XV Fed aEuroparat: Europäische Menschenrechts-Konvention. Gerichtshof & Kommission. Europäische Sozialcharta aVR: XV Fed aSpieker, Dimitri
spelling Spieker, Luke Dimitrios <<[VerfasserIn]>>
Does Article 15 ECHR still matter in military operations abroad?
The UK government's 'presumption to derogate' - much ado about nothing?
Luke Dimitrios Spieker
Heidelberg
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law
10 Jan 2019], 2019
1 Online-Ressource (16 Seiten)
Much has been written on the UKs presumption to derogate from the ECHR in military operations abroad. Unfortunately, the inquiry of the Joint Committee on Human Rights on the proposed derogation launched end of 2016 had to close due to general elections and was regrettably not reopened since. Thus, the presumption to derogate still lacks a final assessment. Although the Committee received submission from leading scholars in the field, the implications of the ECtHRs judgement in Hassan were not at the heart of the discussion. Therefore, this contribution will put the spotlight on this seminal decision and argue that it effectively deprives Art. 15 of any purpose in deployed operations. The ECtHR seems to have developed a new standard the standard of arbitrariness in case of genuine norm conflicts between the ECHR and other international regimes, allowing to lower the ECHRs standard of protection to a mere minimum. This means: the UKs presumption to derogate will have practically no impact. Thus, much ado about
MPIL research paper series
no. 2019, 02
VR001016025
Gesehen am 25.02.2019
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3313658
Verlag
Kostenfrei
Volltext
Spieker, Dimitri
language English
format 0/Buch/
1/Buch/E-Buch/
author Spieker, Luke Dimitrios <<[VerfasserIn]>>
spellingShingle Spieker, Luke Dimitrios <<[VerfasserIn]>>
Does Article 15 ECHR still matter in military operations abroad? : The UK government's 'presumption to derogate' - much ado about nothing?
MPIL research paper series
VR001016025
author_facet Spieker, Luke Dimitrios <<[VerfasserIn]>>
Spieker, Luke Dimitrios <<[VerfasserIn]>>
author_role -
author_sort Spieker, Luke Dimitrios <<[VerfasserIn]>>
author2 Spieker, Luke Dimitrios <<[VerfasserIn]>>
author2_role -
title Does Article 15 ECHR still matter in military operations abroad? : The UK government's 'presumption to derogate' - much ado about nothing?
title_sub The UK government's 'presumption to derogate' - much ado about nothing?
title_short Does Article 15 ECHR still matter in military operations abroad?
title_full Does Article 15 ECHR still matter in military operations abroad? The UK government's 'presumption to derogate' - much ado about nothing? Luke Dimitrios Spieker
title_fullStr Does Article 15 ECHR still matter in military operations abroad? The UK government's 'presumption to derogate' - much ado about nothing? Luke Dimitrios Spieker
title_full_unstemmed Does Article 15 ECHR still matter in military operations abroad? The UK government's 'presumption to derogate' - much ado about nothing? Luke Dimitrios Spieker
title_sort does article 15 echr still matter in military operations abroad? : the uk government's 'presumption to derogate' - much ado about nothing? luke dimitrios spieker
series MPIL research paper series
VR001016025
publisher Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law
publishDate 2019
physical 1 Online-Ressource (16 Seiten)
callnumber-raw VR: XV FED
callnumber-search VR: XV FED
callnumber-sort VR
url https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3313658
illustrated Not Illustrated
institution Local holdings
institution_hierarchy 0/Local holdings/
system_id 001033521
online true
dedup_id_str SpiekerLukeDimitriosVerfasserInDoesArticle15ECHRstillmatterinmilitaryoperationsabroadMaxPlanckInstituteforComparativePublicLawandInternationalLaw
local_classification VR: XV Fed
hierarchy_parent_id 001016025
id 001052072
work_keys_str_mv AT spiekerlukedimitriosverfasserin doesarticle15echrstillmatterinmilitaryoperationsabroadtheukgovernmentspresumptiontoderogatemuchadoaboutnothing
first_indexed 2024-05-05T23:43:26Z
last_indexed 2024-05-05T23:43:26Z
_version_ 1800640356473110528