|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
11873nam 2200397 u 4500 |
| 001 |
VR001031107 |
| 003 |
VRH01000000000000001012570 |
| 008 |
t s2017 r ||| eng |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 978-1-78068-437-6
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 1-78068-437-1
|
| 090 |
|
|
|a EG XVII E 11
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Franzina, Pietro <<[HerausgeberIn]>>
|
| 245 |
0 |
4 |
|a The external dimension of EU private international law after opinion 1/13
|c edited by Pietro Franzina
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland
|b Intersentia
|c [2017]
|c © 2017, 2017
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a xii, 226 Seiten
|c 24 cm
|
| 655 |
|
|
|a Konferenzschrift
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 993 |
|
|
|a 1805
|
| 993 |
|
|
|a toc
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a "Based on papers that were presented at a seminar that took place on 13 February 2015 at the Department of Law of the University of Ferrara" - Vorwort
|
| 024 |
8 |
|
|a 9781780684376
|
| 024 |
3 |
|
|a 9781780684376
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a EG: XVII E
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a EG: XVII E
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a Internationales Privatrecht.
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a EG: XVII E
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u https://aleph.mpg.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=VRH01&local_base=VRH01&doc_number=001012570&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
|3 ToC
|m Völkerrecht Heidelberg
|z VIEW
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a E:W EL* THE EXTERNAL DIMENSION OF EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AFTER OPINION 1/13 EDITED BY PIETRO FRANZINA I018 PLANCE ~ INSTITUT , LUER AUSL. OEFFENTL. RECHT U. VOELKERRECHT J , BIBLIOTHEK 2 /DELBEV /*K INTERSENTIA CAMBRIDGE - ANTWERP - PORTLAND CONTENTS PREFACE........................................................................................................ V PART I. THE INTERNATIONAL PROJECTION OF EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW - SOME BASIC ISSUES ................................... 1 OPINIONS 1/13 AND 2/13 AND EU EXTERNAL RELATIONS LAW MARISE CREMONA ............................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION: TWO SIGNIFICANT OPINIONS...................................... 3 2. PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND EU EXTERNAL POWERS........................... 5 3. THE ROLE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE ........................................................ 14 4. CONCLUSION: THE SPECIFICITY OF THE EU AS AN INTERNATIONAL ACTOR ...... 19 BETWEEN MUTUAL TRUST AND RESPECT FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS - JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CIVIL MATTERS AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AFTER OPINION 2/13 SERENA FORLATI ................................................................................. 21 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................... 21 2. THE ECHR AND EUROPEAN JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CIVIL MATTERS ...... 24 3. THE TREATMENT OF EU LAW BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 27 4. CONCLUSIONS......................................................................................... 38 PART II. OPINION 1/13 AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ............................................. 41 A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IN OPINION 1/13 PAUL BEAUMONT .................................................................................. 43 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a 43 2. BACKGROUND TO OPINION 1/13.............................................................. 44 3. BACKGROUND TO JUDICIAL ACTIVISM....................................................... 45 4. OPINION 1/13 - ADMISSIBILITY ............................................................ 48 5- OPINION 1/13 - SUBSTANCE................................................................... 30 6. CONCLUSION........................................................................................... 30 INTERSENTIA IX CONTENTS THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION*S EXCLUSIVE COMPETENCE WITH REGARD TO THE CHILD ABDUCTION CONVENTION GIORGIO GAJA ....................................................................................... 63 1. THE BASIS AND EXTENT OF THE EXCLUSIVE COMPETENCE OF THE EU CONCERNING INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION ...................................... 63 2. THE SCOPE OF THE EXCLUSIVE COMPETENCE OF THE EU AS REGARDS ACTIONS RELATING TO THE CHILD ABDUCTION CONVENTION.................................... 66 3. THE PROCEDURE FOR EXERCISING THE COMPETENCE OF THE EU AS REGARDS THE CHILD ABDUCTION CONVENTION ....................................................... 66 4. DOES THE CHILD ABDUCTION CONVENTION BIND THE EU? ....................... 67 5. THE ROLE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE INTERPRETATION OF THE CHILD ABDUCTION CONVENTION....................................................................... 69 CONSEQUENCES OF OPINION 1/13 ON THE ACCEPTANCE IN THE EU OF ACCESSIONS TO THE HAGUE CHILD ABDUCTION CONVENTION KAREN VANDEKERCKHOVE ................................................................... 71 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ 71 2. ACCEPTANCE OF ACCESSIONS TO THE 1980 HAGUE CHILD ABDUCTION CONVENTION - THE WAY FORWARD......................................................... 73 3. CONCLUSION........................................................................................... 75
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW MATTERS NOT COVERED BY EU LEGISLATION - WHICH TEST SHOULD BE ADOPTED TO ASSESS THE COMPETENCE OF THE EU? CHIARA E. TUO ..................................................................................... 77 1. THE POSITION OF THE ECJ ON THE EXTERNAL COMPETENCE OF THE EU IN THE AREA OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW ................................................ 77 2. THE *EFFECT ON EU LAW TEST* AS OPPOSED TO THE *NECESSITY TEST* OF OPINION 1/76........................................................................................ 84 3. THE EU LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON FREE MOVEMENT OF CITIZENS AS THE YARDSTICK AGAINST WHICH THE EXCLUSIVE EXTERNAL COMPETENCE IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW MATTERS SHOULD BE ASSESSED ..................... 88 4. FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE: THE *EFFECT ON EU LAW TEST* APPLIED TO THE INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION CONVENTION ................................................... 91 X INTERSENTIA CONTENTS PART III. THE CHANGING FEATURES OF EU EXTERNAL RELATIONS IN THE AREA OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW ........................................ 99 EU EXTERNAL RELATIONS AND PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW: MULTILATERALISM, PLURILATERALISM, BILATERALISM, OR UNILATERALISM? ALEX MILLS .............................................................................................101 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 101 2. MULTILATERALISM......................................................................................104 3. PLURILATERALISM OR BILATERALISM ............................................................ 107 4. UNILATERALISM.........................................................................................110 5. CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................115 EU COOPERATION IN CIVIL MATTERS AND MULTILEVEL UNIFICATION OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW: SOME REMARKS
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a ALESSANDRA ZANOBETTI ......................................................................... 117 1. THE MULTILEVEL UNIFICATION OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW ................... 117 2. THE EUROPEANISATION OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ADOPTION OF UNIFORM RULES AT REGIONAL AND UNIVERSAL LEVEL .... 118 3. THE INTERACTION BETWEEN EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND OTHER PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW INSTRUMENTS ............................................... 123 4. EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AS A TOOL FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE ................................................. 124 5. EU AND UNIFORM INSTRUMENTS IN THE FIELD OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ... 127 6. PERSPECTIVES ON THE UNIFICATION OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW ............ 129 THE LUGANO MODEL - COOPERATIVE ENHANCEMENT OVER ENHANCED COOPERATION CHRIS THOMALE .....................................................................................131 1. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................131 2. THE LUGANO CONVENTION: COOPERATIVE ENHANCEMENT TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA .................................................... 133 3. DIFFERENTIATED INTEGRATION IN EUROPE: THE LUGANO CONVENTION AS A MULTILATERAL INTERNATIONAL TREATY WITH A QUALIFIED CONNECTION TO EU LAW ..................................................... 139 4. LUGANO OUTDATED: WHY LUGANO IN ITS STATUS QUO IS NO VIABLE MODEL OF EUROPEAN OR GLOBAL INTEGRATION ........................................................ 141 5. LUGANO RELOADED: FURTHER POTENTIAL IN SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS AND TAKING OF EVIDENCE.................................................................................145 REGULATIONS (EC) NOS 662/2009 AND 664/2009: CAN EXCLUSIVITY BE SUCCESSFULLY RECONCILED WITH FLEXIBILITY? JAN-JAAP KUIPERS ...................................................................................149 1. INTRODUCTION
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a .......................................................................................... 149 2. EVOLVING UNION COMPETENCES IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW ............... 151 INTERSENTIA XI 3. THE EXTERNAL DIMENSION OF THE EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW REGULATIONS..........................................................................................153 4. THE REGULATIONS .................................................................................... 167 5. CONCLUSION.............................................................................................179 PART IV. EU LEGISLATION ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND EXTRA-EUROPEAN SITUATIONS.........................................................181 THE INTERPLAY OF EU LEGISLATION AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW PIETRO FRANZINA ...................................................................................183 1. THE VIRTUAL GLOBAL REACH OF EU LEGISLATION ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW........................................................................................................183 2. THE ARTICULATION OF EU LEGISLATION AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS: A MATTER OF CONVERGENCE, COMBINATION AND CONFRONTATION ............... 190 3. CONVERGENCE..........................................................................................192 4. COMBINATION..........................................................................................199 5. CONFRONTATION.......................................................................................204 6. CONCLUDING REMARKS.............................................................................209 JURISDICTION UNDER THE EU SUCCESSION REGULATION AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH THIRD COUNTRIES FABRIZIO MARONGIU BUONAIUTI .........................................................211 1. THE LIMITED ERGA OMNES APPROACH UNDERLYING THE SUCCESSION REGULATION*S RULES ON JURISDICTION ...................................................... 211
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a 2. RULES ADDRESSING ISSUES OF COORDINATION WITH THIRD-COUNTRY COURTS...................................................................................................220 3. THE UNILATERAL COORDINATION WITH THE JURISDICTION OF THIRD- COUNTRY COURTS PURSUED BY ARTICLE 12(1) OF THE REGULATION ........ 225 4. CONCLUDING REMARKS.............................................................................226 XII INTERSENTIA
|
| 852 |
|
|
|c EG: XVII E: 11
|m BOOK
|
| 999 |
|
|
|a VRH50
|b MPVRH
|c Institutsbibliothek
|d EG: XVII E: 11
|e unavailable
|t Nicht verfügbar
|f 1
|g 1
|h N
|i 4
|j BIB
|k i
|
