Common core, PECL and DCFR : could they change shipping and transport law?
| Published: | Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland : Intersentia, 2015 |
|---|---|
| Persons: | , , |
| Format: | Book / Printed Book / Conference paper |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | Ius commune europaeum
; 136 |
| Physical description: | xiv, 207 Seiten |
| Item Description: |
Auch als NUR ; 822 gezählt |
| ISBN: | 9781780683324 |
| record_format |
marc |
|---|---|
| spelling |
Verheyen, Wouter <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Common core, PECL and DCFR could they change shipping and transport law? editors: Wouter Verheyen, Frank G.M. Smeele, Marian A.I.H. Hoeks Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland Intersentia 2015], 2015 xiv, 207 Seiten Konferenzschrift Smeele, Frank <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Hoeks, Marian <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Ius commune europaeum 136 VR000250455 Auch als NUR ; 822 gezählt Hoeks, Marian A. I. H. Smeele, Frank Gerhard Martinus Smeele, F. G. M. Smeele, Frank G. M. http://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz446231312inh.pdf ToC Völkerrecht Heidelberg VIEW |
| language |
English |
| format |
0/Buch/ 1/Buch/PrintBuch/ 0/Konferenzschrift/ |
| author |
Verheyen, Wouter <<[HerausgeberIn]>> |
| spellingShingle |
Verheyen, Wouter <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Common core, PECL and DCFR : could they change shipping and transport law? Ius commune europaeum VR000250455 |
| author_facet |
Verheyen, Wouter <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Verheyen, Wouter <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Smeele, Frank <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Hoeks, Marian <<[HerausgeberIn]>> |
| author_role |
- |
| author_sort |
Verheyen, Wouter <<[HerausgeberIn]>> |
| author2 |
Verheyen, Wouter <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Smeele, Frank <<[HerausgeberIn]>> Hoeks, Marian <<[HerausgeberIn]>> |
| author2_role |
- |
| title |
Common core, PECL and DCFR : could they change shipping and transport law? |
| title_sub |
could they change shipping and transport law? |
| title_short |
Common core, PECL and DCFR |
| title_full |
Common core, PECL and DCFR could they change shipping and transport law? editors: Wouter Verheyen, Frank G.M. Smeele, Marian A.I.H. Hoeks |
| title_fullStr |
Common core, PECL and DCFR could they change shipping and transport law? editors: Wouter Verheyen, Frank G.M. Smeele, Marian A.I.H. Hoeks |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Common core, PECL and DCFR could they change shipping and transport law? editors: Wouter Verheyen, Frank G.M. Smeele, Marian A.I.H. Hoeks |
| title_sort |
common core, pecl and dcfr : could they change shipping and transport law? editors: wouter verheyen, frank g.m. smeele, marian a.i.h. hoeks |
| series |
Ius commune europaeum VR000250455 |
| publisher |
Intersentia |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| physical |
xiv, 207 Seiten |
| isbn |
9781780683324 |
| callnumber-first |
EG XIV C 32 |
| callnumber-subject |
EG |
| callnumber-label |
EG XIV C 32 |
| callnumber-raw |
TOC EG: XIV C |
| callnumber-search |
TOC EG: XIV C EG XIV C 32 |
| callnumber-sort |
TOC |
| genre |
Konferenzschrift |
| genre_facet |
Konferenzschrift |
| url |
http://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz446231312inh.pdf |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| institution |
Local holdings |
| institution_hierarchy |
0/Local holdings/ |
| system_id |
000970489 |
| online |
false |
| dedup_id_str |
VerheyenWouterHerausgeberInCommoncorePECLandDCFRIntersentia |
| toc_content |
CONTENTS PREFACE V COMMON CORE, PECL AND DCFR: COULD THEY BE USED TO INTERPRET SHIPPING LAW? CE'CILE LEGROS 1 I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. SCOPE OF APPLICATION OF PECL & DCFR 3 2.1. MATERIAL SCOPE 3 2.2. GEOGRAPHICAL SCOPE 4 2.3. RECIPIENTS 6 III. PECL & DCFR INTERPRETATION PROVISIONS 6 3.1. CONTENT OF THE PROVISIONS 6 3.2. APPLICATION TO SHIPPING CONTRACTS 12 IV. CONCLUSION: MAY COMMON CORE, PECL AND DCFR BE USEFUL TO INTERPRET SHIPPING LAW 13 PRINCIPLES AND RULES OF EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW BETWEEN THE PECL AND THE DCFR FRANCESCA PELLEGRINO 15 I. INTRODUCTION 15 II. WHAT ARE THE PECL AND THE DCFR? 16 III. WHAT IS THE LEGAL NATURE OF THESE TEXTS? 17 IV. WHEN WAS THE PROJECT FOR A EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW LAUNCHED? 17 V. WHO CREATED THE PECL AND THE DCFR AND HOW DID THEY DO IT? 19 VI. BUT WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PECL AND THE DCFR? 19 VII. WHAT SORT OF RULES DO THESE EUROPEAN DOCUMENTS CONTAIN? 20 VIII. ARE GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING GENERAL PRINCIPLES OR MODEL RULES? 23 IX CONTENTS CAN PECL HELP WITH VEXING I |
| local_classification |
ToC EG: XIV C |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
000250455 |
| id |
000988983 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT verheyenwouterherausgeberin commoncorepeclanddcfrcouldtheychangeshippingandtransportlaw |
| first_indexed |
2024-05-05T23:42:07Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-05-05T23:42:07Z |
| _version_ |
1799500190556618752 |
| fullrecord |
11048nam 2200469 ub4500001001200000003002700012008003900039007002400078020002200102020001500124090001600139100004100155245014400196260006200340300002000402655002100422700003800443700003800481041001900519993000900538490003100547830001600578500003200594013001500626084000800641084001400649998001400663998002500677998001400702696002700716696003500743696002100778696002400799856008500823992196700908992198602875992199504861992194106856992166108797852002410458999009610482 VR000988983 VRH01000000000000000970489 t s2015 r 1|| eng tu||||||||||||||||||||| a978-1-78068-332-4 a1780683324 aEG XIV C 32 1 aVerheyen, Wouter <<[HerausgeberIn]>> 00 aCommon core, PECL and DCFR bcould they change shipping and transport law? ceditors: Wouter Verheyen, Frank G.M. Smeele, Marian A.I.H. Hoeks aCambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland bIntersentia c[2015], 2015 axiv, 207 Seiten aKonferenzschrift 1 aSmeele, Frank <<[HerausgeberIn]>> 1 aHoeks, Marian <<[HerausgeberIn]>> 07 aeng 2ISO 639-2 a1701 0 aIus commune europaeum v136 0 aVR000250455 aAuch als NUR ; 822 gezählt aAC12622760 aToC aEG: XIV C aEG: XIV C aSchifffahrt. Häfen. aEG: XIV C aHoeks, Marian A. I. H. aSmeele, Frank Gerhard Martinus aSmeele, F. G. M. aSmeele, Frank G. M. uhttp://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz446231312inh.pdf 3ToC mVölkerrecht Heidelberg zVIEW aCONTENTS PREFACE V COMMON CORE, PECL AND DCFR: COULD THEY BE USED TO INTERPRET SHIPPING LAW? CE'CILE LEGROS 1 I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. SCOPE OF APPLICATION OF PECL & DCFR 3 2.1. MATERIAL SCOPE 3 2.2. GEOGRAPHICAL SCOPE 4 2.3. RECIPIENTS 6 III. PECL & DCFR INTERPRETATION PROVISIONS 6 3.1. CONTENT OF THE PROVISIONS 6 3.2. APPLICATION TO SHIPPING CONTRACTS 12 IV. CONCLUSION: MAY COMMON CORE, PECL AND DCFR BE USEFUL TO INTERPRET SHIPPING LAW 13 PRINCIPLES AND RULES OF EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW BETWEEN THE PECL AND THE DCFR FRANCESCA PELLEGRINO 15 I. INTRODUCTION 15 II. WHAT ARE THE PECL AND THE DCFR? 16 III. WHAT IS THE LEGAL NATURE OF THESE TEXTS? 17 IV. WHEN WAS THE PROJECT FOR A EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW LAUNCHED? 17 V. WHO CREATED THE PECL AND THE DCFR AND HOW DID THEY DO IT? 19 VI. BUT WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PECL AND THE DCFR? 19 VII. WHAT SORT OF RULES DO THESE EUROPEAN DOCUMENTS CONTAIN? 20 VIII. ARE GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING GENERAL PRINCIPLES OR MODEL RULES? 23 IX CONTENTS CAN PECL HELP WITH VEXING ISSUES OF MARITIME LAW? CRITICAL REFLECTIONS FROM THE EXAMPLE OF THE ROTTERDAM RULES LOANNA MAGKLASI 27 I. INTRODUCTION 27 1.1. INTRODUCTION TO PECL 27 1.2. BENEFITS AND OBJECTIVES OF PECL 28 II. FROM CONTRACT LAW TO MARITIME LAW 30 2.1. FORMS OF HARMONISATION OF MARITIME AND TRADE LAWS 31 2.1.1. SETS OF STANDARD TRADE TERMS 31 III. FUSION OF LEGAL SOURCES 33 3.1. MAIN UNDERPINNINGS OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL LAW 34 IV. CAN PECL PROMOTE THE SMOOTH APPLICATION AND EFFICIENT INTEGRATION OF THE ROTTERDAM RULES IN EUROPE? 35 V. SUGGESTIONS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 39 GOOD FAITH* THE DCFR AND SHIPPING LAW ANDREW TETTENBORN 41 I. INTRODUCTION 41 II. BACKGROUND: ENGLISH LAW, CIVILIANS AND GOOD FAITH 42 III. THE PECL, THE DCFR AND GOOD FAITH 45 IV. THE EFFECT ON ENGLISH SHIPPING LAW 47 4.1. STARTING-POINT: IN MANY WAYS, CHANGE MAY BE SURPRISINGLY LIMITED. 47 4.2. MOVING ON: SOME SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF A REQUIREMENT OF GOOD FAITH 50 a4.2.1. THE LAW OF CONTRACT: FORMATION AND FORMALITIES 50 4.2.2. THE RIGHT OF WITHDRAWAL 52 4.2.3. THE EFFECT OF A CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES 55 4.2.4. EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY AND SIMILAR CLAUSES 57 4.2.5. OTHER MATTERS 62 V. CONCLUSION 66 UNEXPECTED CIRCUMSTANCES IN SHIPPING CONTRACTS ELENA ORRU 67 I. PREMISES 67 II. UNEXPECTED CIRCUMSTANCES IN SHIPPING CONTRACTS 68 III. UNEXPECTED CIRCUMSTANCES WITHIN FORMS 69 IV. NATIONAL LAW. ENGLISH LAW 73 4.1. THE DOCTRINE OF FRUSTRATION 73 4.2. THE DOCTRINE OF IMPOSSIBILITY OF PERFORMANCE 76 V. UNEXPECTED CIRCUMSTANCES IN CIVIL LAW 77 5.1. SHIPPING LAW 77 5.2. GENERAL CONTRACT/PRIVATE LAW 80 5.2.1. ITALIAN LAW: THE JURIDICAL AND ECONOMICAL BALANCE OF THE PARTIES 1 OBLIGATIONS 80 CONTENTS 5.2.2. FRENCH LAW 83 5.2.3. WEGFALL DER GESCHIIFTSGRUNDLAGE AND THE DOCTRINE OF ASSUMPTION (GERMANY, DENMARK AND SWEDEN) 83 VI. UNEXPECTED CIRCUMSTANCES IN PECL DCFR AND UPICC 84 VII. CONCLUSIONS 88 LIABILITY OF THE MARITIME CARRIER AND THE SHIPPER FOR OTHER PERSONS: UNIFORM MARITIME TRANSPORT RULES VS. EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW BELE"N GARCIA ALVAREZ 91 I. INTRODUCTION 91 II. NOTION AND TYPES OF AUXILIARIES 92 III. LIABILITY OF THE MARITIME CARRIER FOR OTHER PERSONS IN MARITIME CONVENTIONS 94 IV. LIABILITY OF THE SHIPPER FOR OTHER PERSONS IN MARITIME CONVENTIONS 95 V. LIABILITY OF THE DEBTOR FOR OTHER PERSONS IN EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW 96 5.1. GENERAL RULE, 96 5.1.1. LIABILITY TO THE CREDITOR 96 5.L2. LIABILITY TO THIRD PERSONS 97 5.2. SPECIAL RULE: THE INTERVENER .,,.. 98 VI. SPECIAL SITUATIONS. IN PARTICULAR, IN RELATION TO LOADING, HANDLING, STOWING, AND UNLOADING OF THE GOODS 98 6.1. PRELIMINARY REMARKS 98 6.2. LIABILITY OF THE DEBTOR IN CASE IT IS THE OTHER PARTY WHO PERFORMS SOME OF THE OBLIGATIONS 99 6.3. LIABILITY OF THE PARTY NOT BOUND TO PERFORM THE OBLIGATIONS IN CASE OF GIVING INSTRUCTIONS 103 VII. CONCLUSIONS 103 COULD THE DCFR BE AN ANSWER TO THE LACK OF HARMONIZATION IN THE FIELD OF FORWARDING LAW? - LEGAL QUALIFICATION aANASTASIYA KOZUBOVSKAYA PELL6 105 I. INTRODUCTION 105 II. FREIGHT FORWARDER AS A CARRIER 107 III. FREIGHT FORWARDER AS AN AGENT 108 IV. CONCLUSION 110 HARMONISATION INSTRUMENTS: THE WAY FORWARD FOR FORWARDING LAW? WOUTERVERHEYEN ILL I. PROBLEM STATEMENT ILL 1.1. UNIFORM FORWARDING LAW IS LACKING ILL 1.2. CAN THE HARMONISATION INSTRUMENTS UNIFY FORWARDING LAW? 112 XI CONTENTS II. DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS: STATUS QUESTIONIS 112 2.1. WIDE VARIETY OF PARAMETERS ARE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION: DISCRETIONARY MARGIN 113 2.1.1. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION BASED ON BROADER CONTEXT 113 2.1.2. BROAD INTERPRETATION CONTEXT CREATES WIDE DISCRETIONARY POWER AND UNPREDICTABLE OUTCOME DISPUTES .. 115 2.1.3. APPLYING ACCESSORIUM SEQUITUR PRINCIPALE ADDS ON TO THE UNCERTAINTY 116 2.2. PREDOMINANT WEIGHT SPECIFIC ELEMENTS AND DIFFERENT DIVISION BURDEN OF PROOF CREATE DIVERGING QUALIFICATIONS 117 2.2.1. DOMINANT WEIGHT SPECIFIC ELEMENTS IN CASE LAW 118 2.2.2. LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENT: LIABILITY AS CARRIER 119 2.2.3. PRAETORIAN PRESUMPTION: QUALIFICATION AS CARRIER 121 2.2.4. CONCLUSION 122 III. CAN THE HARMONISATION INSTRUMENTS ELIMINATE DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS OF THE SAME CONTRACT? 122 3.1.1. WIDE CATALOGUE WITH OPEN RULES INAPPROPRIATE FOR UNIFICATION OF CASE LAW 122 3.1.2. ACCESSORIUM SEQUITUR PRINCIPALE RULE INAPPROPRIATE TO SOLVE DISCREPANCIES 124 3.1.3. CONTRA PROFERENTEM RULE CAN AVOID SOME DISCREPANCIES 124 3.1.4. TECHNICAL HINDRANCE TO SUBSTANTIAL ROLE HARMONISATION INSTRUMENTS. 125 IV. CONCLUSION: HARMONISATION INSTRUMENTS CANNOT ELIMINATE DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS OF THE SAME CONTRACT 126 COULD THE DCFR CHANGE SHIPPING LAW? THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE DCFR ON THIRD PARTY RIGHTS UNDER SHIPPING DOCUMENTS - A UK PERSPECTIVE SIMONE LAMONT-BLACK 129 I. INTRODUCTION , 129 II. THE FRAGMENTED POSITION IN THE UK 131 2.1. THE FRAMEWORK IN THE UK 131 2.2. SCOTTISH REFORM DISCUSSIONS 131 2.3. EXCLUDING SHIPPING LAW? 132 2.4. THE FRAGMENTED UK POSITION UNDER TRANSPORT DOCUMENTS 134 a2.5. AN ARTIFICIAL OR NECESSARY DISTINCTION? 135 III. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE DIFFERENT REGIMES 137 3.1. SCOPE 138 3.2. REQUIREMENTS 138 3.3. REMEDIES PROVIDED FOR THIRD PARTIES 139 3.4. CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS ON CONFERRED BENEFIT 142 3.5. JURISDICTION AND ARBITRATION CLAUSES AS A CONDITION ON THE CONFERRED BENEFIT 143 3.6. TIME OF TRANSFER/CONFERRAL; MODIFICATION AND REVOCATION OF BENEFIT 148 XN CONTENTS 3.7. PERFORMANCE RIGHTS OF THE CONTRACTING PARTY (PROMISEE) 150 3.8. DEFENCES 150 3.9. TRANSFER OF OBLIGATIONS 151 IV. CONCLUSION 152 THE EFFECTS OF PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN LAW ON NON-CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES CINZIA INGRATOCI 153 I. INTRODUCTION 153 II. CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURTS OF COMMON AND CIVIL LAW 156 III. CONTRIBUTION OF THE REFERENCE PRINCIPLES AND MODEL RULES OF EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW TO THE DEBATE ON NON-CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES 160 IV. CONCLUSION: CLASSIFICATION SERVICES MARKET EFFICIENIES AND PURPOSES OF GENERAL INTEREST 163 TOWARDS A EURO-MARITIME CONTRACT LAW? PABLO CONSTENLA 167 I. INTRODUCTION 167 II. THE ROOTS FOR A COMPLETE EU MARITIME LAW AROSE INCIDENTALLY 168 III. EU IS SUPPORTED BY THE LAW AND THE INDUSTRY TO ACHIEVE ITS FOUNDATIONAL AIM 169 IV. THE COMPLEXITY OF SHIPPING BUSINESS 169 V. SUITABLE METHOD TO REGULATE PRIVATE MARITIME LAW 170 5.1. PECL AND DCFR AS VOLUNTARY PRIVATE RULES 170 5.2. CHOICE OF LAW AS AN OPTION 171 5.2.1. UNCERTAINTY REMAINS 171 5.2.2. ROME I REGULATION AND THE ROTTERDAM RULES 172 5.3. MANDATORY AND UNIFORM SYSTEM 173 5.3.1. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS CONCLUDED BY THE EU HAVE PREFERENCE OVER EU SECONDARY LAW AND MEMBER STATES NATIONAL LAW 173 5.3.2. EU INSTITUTIONS ARE COMPETENT IN REGULATING EU TRANSPORT 174 5.3.3. THE TRANSPORT OF GOODS AS THE "MIRROR IMAGE" 175 VI. CONCLUSION 178 PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN INSURANCE CONTRACT LAW AND MARINE INSURANCE JOSE* MANUEL MARTIN OSANTE 179 I. INTRODUCTION 179 aII. PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN INSURANCE CONTRACT LAW 179 2.1. SCOPE OF APPLICATION 179 2.2. MANDATORY APPLICATION VERSUS FREEDOM OF CONTRACT 181 2.3. FORM OF THE CONTRACT 181 XIII I CONTENTS 2.4. OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES 181 2.4.1. DUTY OF DISCLOSURE 181 2.4.2. PAYMENT OF THE PREMIUM 182 2.4.3. NOTICE OF INSURED EVENT 182 2.4.4. PAYMENT OF THE INDEMNITY 183 III. THE SPANISH LAW 14/2014 OF MARITIME NAVIGATION 183 3.1. INTRODUCTION 183 3.2. LEGAL SOURCES 184 3.3. FORM OF THE CONTRACT 185 3.4. OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES 186 3.4.1. DUTY OF DISCLOSURE 186 3.4.2. PAYMENT OF THE PREMIUM 187 3.4.3. NOTICE OF INSURED EVENT 187 3.4.4. AVOIDANCE OR MITIGATION OF THE DAMAGE 188 3.4.5. PAYMENT OF THE INDEMNITY 188 3.5. SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CERTAIN TYPES OF MARINE INSURANCE 188 3.5.1. SHIP INSURANCE 188 3.5.1.1. VOYAGE OR TIME INSURANCE 188 3.5.1.2. COLLISION 189 3.5.1.3. SEAWORTHINESS 189 3.5.1.4. MAXIMUM LIMIT PER CLAIM 190 3.5.1.5. NEW FOR OLD DEDUCTIONS 190 3.5.1.6. SUBROGATION AND CREW 190 3.5.1.7. INDIVISIBILITY OF THE PREMIUM 191 3.5.1.8. SUBSIDIARITY. 191 3.5.2. CARGO INSURANCE 191 3.5.2.1. TIME LIMIT OF THE COVER 191 3.5.2.2. FLOATING POLICIES 192 3.5.2.3. CIVIL LIABILITY INSURANCE 192 IV. CONCLUSIONS 193 THE PERSPECTIVES OF ENGLISH AND EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW TO AGREED DAMAGES CLAUSES IN VOYAGE CHARTERPARTIES RHIDIAN THOMAS 195 I. INTRODUCTION 195 II. DRAFT COMMON FRAME OF REFERENCE 196 2.1. RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE DCFR 196 2.2. COMMENTS ON THE DCFR , 198 III. ENGLISH COMMON LAW 200 IV. COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF DFCR AND THE ENGLISH COMMON LAW 204 4.1. GENERAL 204 4.2. APPLICATION TO DEMURRAGE CLAUSES IN VOYAGE CHARTERPARTIES 205 XIV cEG: XIV C: 32 mBOOK aVRH50 bMPVRH cInstitutsbibliothek dEG: XIV C: 32 eavailable tVerfügbar f1 g0 hN i0 jBIB ki |