|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
12393nam 2200421 u 4500 |
| 001 |
VR000633138 |
| 003 |
VRH01000000000000000615296 |
| 008 |
t s2003 r ||| eng |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 90-76871-16-7
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789076871165
|
| 090 |
|
|
|a VR XIX Vg 232
|
| 245 |
0 |
4 |
|a The application of EC law in arbitration proceedings
|c Natalya Shelkoplyas
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Groningen
|b Europa Law Publ.
|c 2003, 2003
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XVIII, 488 S.
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 other code
|
| 993 |
|
|
|a 0409 0501BB
|
| 993 |
|
|
|a toc
|
| 024 |
8 |
|
|a 9789076871165
|
| 024 |
3 |
|
|a 9789076871165
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a VR: XIX Vg
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a EG: XV Cb
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a VR: XIX Vg
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a Internationales Privatrecht. Zivilprozeßrecht. Schiedsverfahren.
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a VR: XIX Vg
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a EG: XV Cb
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a Gerichtshof: Verfahren. Einzelthema.
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a EG: XV Cb
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u https://aleph.mpg.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=VRH01&local_base=VRH01&doc_number=000615296&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
|3 ToC
|m Völkerrecht Heidelberg
|z VIEW
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a IMAGE 1 THE APPLICATION OF EC LAW IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS DR. NATALYA SHELKOPLYAS IMAGE 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER I GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1 ARBITRATION AND EC LAW: NE'ER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET? 3 1.1.1 ARBITRATION AND STATE COURTS' ADJUDICATION 3 1.1.2 ARBITRATION PERCEPTION OF EC LAW 9 1.1.3 SPECIFK CHARACTERISTICS OF EC LAW AND ARBITRATION 12 1.2 THE PRESENT RESEARCH: QUESTIONS ADDRESSED 16 PART I EC LAW OBJECTIVES PURSUED AND REQUIREMENTS I M P O S ED CHAPTER 2 EC LAW AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF NATIONAL LEGAL ORDER 2.1 INTRODUCTION 27 2.2 SUPREMACY 29 2.3 DIRECT EFFECT OF EC LAW 32 2.3.1 DIRECT EFFECT OF EC LAW: CONDITIONS 32 2.3.2 DIRECTIVES AND THEIR EFFECTS IN NATIONAL LEGAL ORDER 38 2.3.2.1 DIRECT EFFECT OF DIRECTIVES 38 2.3.2.2 CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION 46 2.3.2.3 INCIDENTAL DIRECT EFFECT 53 2.3.2.4 SOME RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE PRIVATE CONTEXT 59 2.3.2.5 CONCLUSIONS 67 2.4 SOME PRELIMINARY REFLECTIONS ON THE RELEVANCE OF THE PRECEDING DISCUSSIONS TO THE PRESENT RESEARCH 70 CHAPTER 3 T HE IMPACT OF EC LAW ON PROCEDURAL MATTERS: NATIONAL PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY V. C O M M U N I TY REQUIREMENTS 3.1 INTRODUCTION 77 3.2 CASE LAW ON VARIOUS TIME-LIMITS AND OTHER PROCEDURAL LIMITATIONS 82 3.2.1 TAKING PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES INTO ACCOUNT: THE MEMBER STATE'S FAULT AND ACCESS TO JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS 83 3.2.2 D I S T A N C I NG FROM EMMOTT: LIMITS ON RETROSPECTIVE C L A I MS 85 3.2.3 R E C U R R E N CE OF EMMOTT: T HE INFLUENCE OF FAULT 86 3.2.4 RATIONALISING THE COURT'S APPROACH 89 3.2.5 GIVING SUBSTANCE TO THE 'EQUIVALENCE' TEST 90 3.3 VAN SCHIJNDEL AND PETERBROECK: THE PROCEDURAL 'RULE OF REASON' TEST 92 3.3.1 LEGITIMATE A I MS OF NATIONAL PROCEDURAL RESTRICTIONS A ND T HE R E Q U I R E M E NT OF EFFECTIVENESS: T HE DEVELOPMENT OF PARAMETERS OF A BALANCING EXERCISE 93 3.3.2 T H E ' R U LE OF R E A S O N ' T E S T: CLARIFYING OR COMPLICATING? 96 IMAGE 3 THE APPLICATION OF EC LAW IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS 3-3-3 3-4 3.4.1
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a 3.4.2 3-5 CHAPTER 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 PART II THE 'OTHERNESS' OF PETERBROECK: A FURTHER REFINEMENT OR LIMITS OF VAN SCHIJNDEU NATIONAL REMEDIES AND THE REQUIREMENT OF EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS AS TO THE NATIONAL REMEDY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELF-STANDING TEST OF EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL PROTECTION TYPE OF REMEDY TO BE GRANTED: STRETCHING THE EXISTING REMEDY BEYOND ITS ORIGINAL LIMITS? CONCLUSIONS APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES FORMULATED BY THE COURT WITH REGARD TO NATIONAL PROCEDURES AND REMEDIES IN THE CONTEXT OF ARBITRATION INTRODUCTION: ECO SWISS EC COMPETITION RULES AS PUBLIC POLICY RULES PUBLIC POLICY IN THE CONTEXT OF PROCEEDINGS FOR SETTING ASIDEOF ARBITRAL AWARDS REQUIREMENTS REGARDING JUDICIAL REVIEW IN MATTERS OF ARBITRATION CONCLUSIONS INTERACTION BETWEEN ARBITRATION AND EC LAW 97 I3 107 "9 123 127 CHAPTER 5 AN OVERVIEW OF ARBITRATION CASES RAISING COMMUNITY LAW ISSUES 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.2 AN OVERVIEW OF ARBITRATION CASES RAISING COMMUNITY LAW ISSUES: PRELIMINARY REMARKS 5. 3 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DISPUTES 5.3.1 PARTIES' NATIONALITIES 5.3.2 TYPES OF CLAIMS 5.3.3 CIRCUMSTANCES OF INVOCATION OF EC LAW ISSUES 5.3.3.1 EC LAW AS THE GOVERNING LAW AGREED ON BY THE PARTIES 5.3.3.2 INVOCATION OF EC LAW BY THE PARTIES AS THE LEGAL BASIS OF THEIR CLAIM AS A DEFENSIVE DEVICE (SUBSTANTIVE AND JURISDICTIONAL DEFENCE) 5.3.3.3 APPLICATION OFEC LAW BY ARBITRATORS ADMISSIBILITY OF INVOCATION OF EC LAW APPLICATION OF EC LAW TO THE MERITS OF THE CASE 5.4 CONCLUSIONS H7 H7 1 5 150 154 154 '55 157 '59 159 IMAGE 4 CHAPTER 6 THE GENERAL PROBLEM OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARBITRATION AND PUBLIC POLICY 6.1 INTRODUCTION , 7, 6.2 TERMINOLOGY IN DIFFERENT LEGAL CONTEXTS: MORE THAN SEMANTIC DIFFERENCES 172 6.2.1 FRENCH/CIVIL LAW V. COMMON LAW TRADITIONS 172 6.2.2 THE ROME CONVENTION AND THE BRUESSELS CONVENTION 173 6.2.3 E U R O P E AN C O M M U N I TY PUBLIC POLICY 174 6.2.4 TRULY INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC POLICY 179
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a 6.2.5 TERMINOLOGY IN THE PRESENT RESEARCH 180 6.3 PUBLIC POLICY BEFORE STATE COURTS 181 6.3.1 DOMESTIC (INTERNAL) SITUATIONS. DOMESTIC MANDATORY RULES 181 6.3.2 IN THE PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW CONTEXT 185 6.3.2.1 C H O I CE OF LAWS (CONFLICT OF LAWS) P R O C E SS 185 P U B L IC POLICY EXCEPTION 185 LOIS DE POLICE / INTERNATIONAL MANDATORY RULES 188 PUBLIC POLICY V. RULES OF PUBLIC POLICY AND LOIS DE POLICE: T HE CRITIQUE 193 CONCLUSIONS 197 6.3.2.2 RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 198 ILLUSTRATION 200 JUDGMENTS - THE BRUESSELS CONVENTION AND THE FOLLOW UP REGULATION 4 4 / 2 0 01 201 6.3.2.3 PUBLIC POLICY IN ARBITRATION-RELATED COURT PROCEEDINGS 206 6.4 CONCLUSIONS 209 CHAPTER 7 EC COMPETITION LAW AS A SYSTEM OF RULES EXPRESSING PUBLIC POLICY CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 INTRODUCTION 273 7.2 T H E O V E R A LL VALUES A ND GOALS OF COMPETITION LAW 214 7.2.1 UNDERLYING PUBLIC POLICY OBJECTIVES O F EC COMPETITION LAW 219 7.2.2 P R E L I M I N A RY CONCLUSIONS 228 7.3 COMPETITION LAW ON T HE INTERNATIONAL PLANE 229 7.4 FEATURES A ND CHARACTERISTICS OF EC COMPETITION R U L ES 233 7.4.1 COMPETITION RULES AS M A N D A T O RY R U L ES EXPRESSING DOMESTIC PUBLIC POLICY 233 7.4.2 COMPETITION R U L ES AS LOIS DE POLICE (RULES OF I M M E D I A TE APPLICATION) 233 7.4.3 COMPETITION RULES AS PUBLIC POLICY R U L E S: T HE CRITIQUE 234 7.5 CONCLUSIONS 237 IMAGE 5 THE APPLICATION OF EC LAW IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS PART III GROUNDS OF APPLICATION OF EC LAW IN ARBITRATION CHAPTER 8 ARBITRABILITY 8.1 INTRODUCTION 245 8.2 ARBITRABILITY IN GENERAL 246 8.3 METHODS OF DETERMINATION OF ARBITRABILITY AND THEIR APPLICATION TO THE ARBITRABILITY OF EC COMPETITION MATTERS 247 8.4 OBSTACLES TO ARBITRABILITY IN EC COMPETITION LAW 254 8.5 CONCLUSIONS 256 CHAPTER 9 APPLICATION OF EC LAW BY ARBITRATORS 9.1 INTRODUCTION 261 9.2 CHOICE OF APPLICABLE LAW BY ARBITRATORS: A COMPARATIVE SURVEY OF ARBITRATION ACTS, TREATIES, ARBITRATION RULES AND ARBITRATION PRACTICE 264
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a 9.2.1 RESPECT OF PARTY AUTONOMY BY ARBITRATORS - A CORNERSTONE PRINCIPLE 264 9.2.2 THE POWERS OF ARBITRATORS TO DETERMINE THE APPLICABLE LAW IN THE ABSENCE OF THE PARTIES' CHOICE 266 9.3 GROUNDS OF APPLICATION OF EC LAW: THE PERSPECTIVE OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND ARBITRATION - A SPECIAL CASE FOR EC MANDATORY RULES? 273 9.3.1 APPLICATION OF EC LAW AS PART OF T HE LEX CONTRACTUS (LEX CAUSAE) 275 9.3.1.1 SELECTED BY THE PARTIES 276 9.3.1.2 SELECTED BY ARBITRATORS 281 9.3.2 APPLICATION OF EC MANDATORY LAW OUTSIDE LEX CONTRACTUS 282 9.3.2.1 REASONS AND JUSTIFICATIONS FOR APPLICATION OF LOIS DE POLICE OF THIRD STATES 283 THEORIES OF LOIS DE POLICE OF THIRD STATES IN ARBITRATION 283 9.4 CONCLUSIONS 291 9.4.1 PARTY AUTONOMY AND ARBITRATORS' DISCRETION AS GROUNDS OF APPLICATION OF EC LAW: PRIVATISATION OF LAWTHROUGH ARBITRATION - CONVERTING MANDATORY RULES INTO DEFAULT RULES 291 9.4.2 THE EXCEPTIONAL 'LOIS DE POLICE' GROUND OF APPLICATION OF EC LAW 294 9.4.3 BREAKING AWAY FROM THE TRODDEN PATH 295 CHAPTER 10 THE EUROPEAN LAW PERSPECTIVE OF THE POSSIBLE GROUNDS OF APPLICATION OF COMMUNITY LAW IN ARBITRATION 10.1 INTRODUCTION 301 10.2 A CRITICAL OVERVIEW OF T HE EUROPEAN APPROACH A ND ITS UNDERLYING METHODOLOGY 302 IMAGE 6 IO. 3 CHAPTER II II.I II.2 11.2.1 11.2.2 10.2.1 INTRINSIC FEATURES OF EC LAW AS GROUNDS FOR ITS APPLICATION IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS (SUPREMACY, DIRECT EFFECT, EFFECTIVENESS, AND UNIFORM APPLICATION) BRINGING EC LAW INTO FOCUS WHAT IS GOOD FOR COURTS IS GOOD FOR ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS? A UNIVERSAL 'RESERVE' ARGUMENT 10.2.2 PUBLIC POLICY CHARACTER OF EC LAW: RECEPTION AND ADAPTATION OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND CIVIL LAW CONCEPTS IN THE SEARCH FOR THE GROUNDS OF APPLICATION OF EC LAW IN ARBITRATION A DUTY CREATED BY A SUSPENDED SWORD? ILLUSTRATION DO ARBITRAL AWARDS ESCAPE THE LAW OF PROBABILITY? CONDUSION 11.2.3 11.3 11.4 11.5 PARTIV CHAPTER 12 12.1 12.2 12.2.1 I2.3 12.3.I 12.3.2
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a PRACTICAL ISSUES OF APPLICATION OF EC LAW INTRODUCTION PLEADING AND PROOF OF EC LAW: SPECIFICITY OF ARBITRAL ADJUDICATION THE CONSENSUAL CHARACTER OF ARBITRAL JURISDICTION AND THE SCOPE OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT THE PRINCIPLE OF JUDICIAL PASSIVITY OF ARBITRATORS AND EX QFFICIO APPLICATION OF EC LAW JUDICIAL PASSIVITY AND FREEDOM OF DISPOSITION AS A HALLMARK OF ARBITRAL ADJUDICATION 'EX QFFICIO' WITHOUT THE 'OFFICE'? PROVING THE CONTENT OF EC LAW AVAILABLE REMEDIES INTERPRETATION OF EC LAW CONCLUSION SAFEGUARDS OF APPLICATION OF EC LAW IN ARBITRATION EX POST CONTROL BY THE COURTS INTRODUCTION CONTROL OVER ARBITRAL AWARDS BY STATE COURTS: AN OVERVIEW MEANS, MEANING, AND SPERIFK GOALS OF JUDICIAL CONTROL MEANS AND EXTENT OF STATE COURTS' CONTROL SETTING ASIDE PROCEEDINGS REFUSAL OF RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 12.3.2.1 SETTING ASIDE AND REFUSAL OF ENFORCEMENT COMPARED 12.3.3 PUBLIC POLICY AS THE MOST RELEVANT GROUND FOR THE EXERCISE OF THE CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE WITH EC LAW AT THE SETTING ASIDE OR ENFORCEMENT STAGE: A HYPOTHESIS 302 33 304 37 308 309 314 315 317 321 322 322 324 324 326 332 336 339 341 347 347 347 353 354 358 359 360 IMAGE 7 THE APPLICATION OF EC LAW IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS 12.3.3.I PUBLIC POLICY GROUND AT THE SETTING ASIDE OR ENFORCEMENT STAGE: ITS MEANING 363 EXCEPTION OF PUBLIC POLICY AS A BAR TO THE RECOGNITION OF THE LEGAL EFFECTS OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 363 LOIS DE POLICE AS PART OF THE MECHANISM OF PUBLIC POLICY EXCEPTION? 364 I2.3-3.2PRINCIPLES OF THE EXERCISE OF THE EX POST CONTROL ON THE PUBLIC POLICY GROUND 369 TWO RIVAL VIEWS: THE DIVIDING LINE 369 'POSITIVIST' VIEW 371 ILLUSTRATION 377 'TRADITIONAP VIEW 378 IMPLICATIONS 384 12.3.4 APPEAL AGAINST T HE AWARD ON T HE POINTS OF LAW: T HE TRADITIONAL ENGLISH SOLUTION 385 12.4 THE ROLE OF THE ECJ AND THE PROCEDURE OF ARTICLE 234 EC IN THE STATE COURTS' CONTROL OVER ARBITRAL AWARDS 387 12.5 CONTROL OF ARBITRAL AWARDS BY THE COURTS OF THE EC MEMBER STATES
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a AND OUTSIDE THE COMMUNITY: A CASE OF DOUBLE STANDARDS? 39 2 12.6 APPRAISAL OF THE WAYS IN WHICH THE APPLICATION OF EC LAW IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS IS SAFEGUARDED 394 CHAPTER 13 ASSISTANCE FROM VARIOUS NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONS AS A SAFEGUARD MECHANISM IN THE APPLICATION OF EUROPEAN LAW IN ARBITRATION 13.1 INTRODUCTION 399 13.2 NATIONAL COURTS' ASSISTANCE IN THE APPLICATION OF EC LAW VIA TRADITIONAL MECHANISMS 4' 13.3 ROLE OF THE ECJ AND ARTICLE 234 EC PROCEDURE 45 13.3.1 DIRECT REFERENCE TO THE ECJ FOR PRELIMINARY RULING: THE DICTA OF NORDSEE 4" OPINION OF AG REISCHL: LONGEVITY OF THE WELL-REASONED ARGUMENTS 4 12 THE JUDGMENT: DEAR REJECTION, AMBIGUOUS THREAT? 4 THE CORE OF THE PROBLEM 4 I8 13.3.2 INDIRECT REFERENCE THROUGH THE NATIONAL COURTS 4 N 9 13.3.3 ASSESSMENT OF THE FEASIBILITY AND DESIRABILITY OF GRANTING ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS DIRECT OR INDIRECT ACCESS TO THE MECHANISM OF PRELIMINARY PROCEDURE OF ARTICLE 234 EC 4 22 13.4 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION 422 13.4.1 INFORMAL REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION 423 13.5 CONCLUSION 4 2 5 IMAGE 8 PARTV CHAPTER 14 14 EPILOGUE BROADER IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN APPROACH BROADER IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN APPROACH 431 B I B L I O G R A P HY 439 TABLEOF CASES 467 ABBREVIATIONS 475 INDEX 479
|
| 852 |
|
|
|c VR: XIX Vg: 232
|m BOOK
|
| 999 |
|
|
|a VRH50
|b MPVRH
|c Institutsbibliothek
|d VR: XIX Vg: 232
|e available
|t Verfügbar
|f 1
|g 0
|h N
|i 6
|j BIB
|k i
|
