Comparison of the coverage and rotation of asymmetrical and symmetrical tibial components: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparison of the coverage and rotation of asymmetrical and symmetrical tibial components: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Authors: Zhang, Ziming1,2 (AUTHOR), Zhang, Tiantian1 (AUTHOR), Zhang, Le2 (AUTHOR), Chen, Zehua3 (AUTHOR), Zhao, Haoming2 (AUTHOR), Kuang, Jianjun1 (AUTHOR) 13786165656@163.com, Ou, Liang1 (AUTHOR) ouliang2020@163.com
Superior Title: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 4/26/2024, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p1-13. 13p.
Subject Terms: *TOTAL knee replacement, *ROTATIONAL motion, *DATA extraction
Geographic Terms: CHINA
Abstract: Background: An optimized fit of the tibial component to the resection platform and correct rotational alignment are critical for successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there remains controversy regarding the superiority of symmetric tibial component versus asymmetric tibial component. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence for comparing the coverage and rotation of asymmetrical and symmetrical tibial component. Methods: We searched potentially relevant studies form PubMed, Web of science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), up to 1 March 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Results: Sixteen articles were identified. Compared to symmetric tibial component, asymmetric tibial component increased the coverage of the proximal tibial cut surface (MD, -2.87; 95%CI, -3.45 to -2.28; P < 0.00001), improved the prevalence of tibial baseplate underhang (OR, 0.16; 95%CI, 0.07 to 0.33; P < 0.00001) and malrotation (OR, 0.13; 95%CI, 0.02 to 0.90; P = 0.04), and reduced the degree of tibial component rotation (MD, -3.11; 95%CI, -5.76 to -0.47; P = 0.02). But there was no statistical significance for improving tibial baseplate overhang (OR, 0.58; 95%CI, 0.08 to 3.97; P = 0.58). Additionally, no revision had occurred for the two tibial components in the included studies. Conclusion: The current evidence shows asymmetric tibial component offer advantages in terms of coverage and rotation compared with symmetric tibial component in TKA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Premier
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Description not available.