Academic Journal

On Bayesian credibility mean for finite mixture distributions.

Bibliographic Details
Title: On Bayesian credibility mean for finite mixture distributions.
Authors: Jahanbani, Ehsan1 (AUTHOR), Payandeh Najafabadi, Amir T.1 (AUTHOR) amirtpayandeh@sbu.ac.ir, Masoumifard, Khaled1 (AUTHOR)
Superior Title: Annals of Actuarial Science. Mar2024, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p5-29. 25p.
Subject Terms: *REGRESSION analysis, REGRESSION trees, ERROR functions, LOGISTIC regression analysis, MIXTURES
Abstract: Consider the problem of determining the Bayesian credibility mean $E(X_{n+1}|X_1,\cdots, X_n),$ whenever the random claims $X_1,\cdots, X_n,$ given parameter vector $\boldsymbol{\Psi},$ are sampled from the K-component mixture family of distributions, whose members are the union of different families of distributions. This article begins by deriving a recursive formula for such a Bayesian credibility mean. Moreover, under the assumption that using additional information $Z_{i,1},\cdots,Z_{i,m},$ one may probabilistically determine a random claim $X_i$ belongs to a given population (or a distribution), the above recursive formula simplifies to an exact Bayesian credibility mean whenever all components of the mixture distribution belong to the exponential families of distributions. For a situation where a 2-component mixture family of distributions is an appropriate choice for data modelling, using the logistic regression model, it shows that: how one may employ such additional information to derive the Bayesian credibility model, say Logistic Regression Credibility model, for a finite mixture of distributions. A comparison between the Logistic Regression Credibility (LRC) model and its competitor, the Regression Tree Credibility (RTC) model, has been given. More precisely, it shows that under the squared error loss function, it shows the LRC's risk function dominates the RTC's risk function at least in an interval which about $0.5.$ Several examples have been given to illustrate the practical application of our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Annals of Actuarial Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Business Source Premier
Description
Description not available.