Periodical

Supreme Court eschews reliance on Rogers test and pares back dilution protection for parody in trademark ruling.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Supreme Court eschews reliance on Rogers test and pares back dilution protection for parody in trademark ruling.
Superior Title: Business Torts Reporter. Aug2023, Vol. 35 Issue 10, p220-224. 5p.
Subject Terms: *TRADEMARKS, *TRADEMARK infringement, APPELLATE courts, CONSTITUTIONAL courts, PARODY, DILUTION
Abstract: The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, where the Court rejected the reliance on the Rogers test for trademark infringement protection in cases involving parody, stating that the test doesn't apply when an alleged infringer uses a trademark as a designation of source for its goods, rather than for creative expression.
Database: Business Source Premier
Description
Description not available.