Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
DON KERUBIN ŠEGVIĆ I PITANJE SV. DUJMA. |
| Alternate Title: |
DON KERUBIN ŠEGVIĆ AND QUESTION OF ST. DUJAM. |
| Authors: |
Dukić, Josip1 jdukic@kbf.unist.hr, Dukić, Bernard1 bernard.dukic@gmail.com |
| Superior Title: |
Church in the World / Crkva u Svijetu. 2023, Vol. 58 Issue 3, p465-488. 24p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*ARCHAEOLOGICAL museums & collections, *COMMUNIST parties, *THEOLOGY, CATHOLIC Church doctrines |
| Abstract (English): |
The question of St. Dujam and apostolicity of the Church of Split, i.e. its direct connection with the apostles, has been the focus of research by numerous researchers throughout history and is still very relevant. It is insufficiently known in the scientific community that the priest from Split, Don Kerubin Šegvić (Split, 23 February 1867 - Zagreb, after 29 June 1945) was involved in the scientific debate. In this context, the fact that Don Kerubin was sentenced to death by the communist government in Zagreb on June 29, 1945 and then liquidated is not unimportant, which turned his life and work into a taboo subject until the beginning of democratic changes in Croatia. Don Kerubin joined the discussion at the beginning of March 1901 when his scientific study “Storia e leggenda di S. Domnione o Doimo vescovo e martire di Salona e delle sue reliquie. Saggio storico-critico” was published in Split. In the study, Šegvić deals with the question of the date of Dujam’s death, the place where his bones are kept and the veneration of Dujam throughout history. The distribution of Šegvić’s study was banned on March 9, 1901 by the Roman Congregation of Sacred Rites on the recommendation of Split Bishop Filip Frano Nakić (1889-1910). When Bishop Nakić’s chancellor Don Leopold Ivanišević took over the confiscated copies of Don Kerubin’s studies from Don Frane Bulić on March 29, 1901, Don Frane wrote “Resurrecturis” on each of the four packages, in the hope that one day those studies would be “resurrected”. We will try to clarify in this article what was disputed by the church authorities in Šegvić’s book and what is its scientific value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Croatian): |
Pitanje sv. Dujma i apostoliciteta splitske Crkve, tj. njene izravne veze s apostolima, bilo je tijekom povijest u središtu istraživanja brojnih istraživača i još uvijek je vrlo aktualno. U znanstvenoj javnosti nedovoljno je poznato da je splitski svećenik don Kerubin Šegvić (Split, 23. II. 1867. − Zagreb, nakon 29. VI. 1945.) bio uključen u znanstvenu raspravu. U tom kontekstu nije nevažna činjenica da su don Kerubina komunističke vlasti u Zagrebu 29. lipnja 1945. osudile na smrt i potom likvidirale, što je njegov život i rad pretvorilo u tabu temu sve do početka demokratskih promjena u Hrvatskoj. Don Kerubin se uključio u raspravu početkom ožujka 1901., kada je u Splitu tiskana njegova znanstvena studiju “Storia e leggenda di S. Domnione o Doimo vescovo e martire di Salona e delle sue reliquie. Saggio storico-critico”. Šegvić se u studiji bavi pitanjem datuma Dujmove smrti, mjesta na kojem se čuvaju njegove kosti i štovanjem Dujma tijekom povijesti. Raspačavanje Šegvićeve studije zabranila je 9. ožujka 1901. rimska Kongregacija obredâ po preporuci splitskog biskupa Filipa Frane Nakića (1889. - 1910.). Kada je kancelar biskupa Nakića don Leopold Ivanišević 29. ožujka 1901. preuzeo od don Frane Bulića zaplijenjene primjerke don Kerubinove studije, don Frane je na svakom od četiri paketa napisao “Resurrecturis”, u nadi da će jednog dana te studije “uskrsnuti”. Što je u Šegvićevoj knjizi bilo sporno crkvenoj vlasti i koja je njezina znanstvena vrijednost, nastojat ćemo razjasniti u ovom članku. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Church in the World / Crkva u Svijetu is the property of University of Split, Catholic Faculty of Theology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Premier |