Academic Journal

A COMPARISON OF TWO MODELS OF ORBISPACES.

Bibliographic Details
Title: A COMPARISON OF TWO MODELS OF ORBISPACES.
Authors: KÖRSCHGEN, ALEXANDER1
Superior Title: Homology, Homotopy & Applications. 2018, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p329-358. 30p.
Subject Terms: *COMPACT groups, *LIE groups, *HOMOTOPY theory, *CATEGORIES (Mathematics), *ISOTROPY subgroups
Abstract: This paper proves that the two homotopy theories for orbispaces given by Gepner and Henriques and by Schwede, respectively, agree by providing a zig-zag of Dwyer-Kan equivalences between the respective topologically enriched index categories. The aforementioned authors establish various models for unstable global homotopy theory with compact Lie group isotropy, and orbispaces serve as a common denominator for their particular approaches. Although the two flavors of orbispaces are expected to agree with each other, a concrete comparison zig-zag has not been known so far. We bridge this gap by providing such a zigzag which asserts that all those models for unstable global homotopy theory with compact Lie group isotropy which have been described by the authors named above agree with each other. On our way, we provide a result which is of independent interest. For a large class of free actions of a compact Lie group, we prove that the homotopy quotient by the group action is weakly equivalent to the strict quotient. This is a known result under more restrictive conditions, e.g., for free actions on a manifold. We broadly extend these results to all free actions of a compact Lie group on a compactly generated Hausdorff space. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Homology, Homotopy & Applications is the property of International Press of Boston and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Premier
Description
Description not available.