Search Results - Learning--Research

Relation: Acosta-Valdeleón, W., y Carreño-Manosalva, C. (2013). Modo 3 de producción de conocimiento. Implicaciones para la Universidad de hoy. Revista de La Universidad de La Salle, 61, 67-86; Alag, S. (2008). Collective intelligence in action. Manning Publications Co.; ARS-CHILE. (2014). Manual Tutorial de UCINET 6. https://www.arschile.cl/ucinet2014/spreadhsheet.htm; Balconi, M., Breschi, S., y Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33, 127-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2; Barabasi, A. (2002). The New Science of Networks (Vol. 6). Perseus Books Group. https://doi.org/10.2307/20033300; Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/200773143_Education_ and_Mind_in_the_Knowledge_Age; Berlanga, A., Peñalvo, F., y Sloep. (2010). Towards eLearning 2.0 University. Guest Editorial, Special Issue, 8(3), 199- 201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.500498; Binz, C., Truffer, B., y Coenen, L. (2014). Why space matters in technological innovation systems–Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Research Policy, 43(1), 138-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002; Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., y Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com.co/books?id=VjS6NAEACAAJ; Boschma, R. A., y ter Wal, A. L. J. (2007). Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy. Industry and Innovation, 14(2), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710701253441; Broekel, T. (2012). Collaboration Intensity and Regional Innovation Efficiency in Germany— A Conditional Efficiency Approach. Industry and Innovation, 19(2), 155-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.650884; Broekel, T., y Brachert, M. (2015). The Structure and Evolution of Intersectoral Technological Complementarity in R&D in Germany from 1990 to 2011. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25, 755-785. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0415-7; Brown, P., y Lauder, H. (2001). Education, Globalization and Economic Development. In A. Bolder, W. R. Heinz, y G. Kutscha (Eds.). Deregulierung der Arbeit–Pluralisierung der Bildung? (pp. 31-53). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97487-7_3; Burbules, N. C. (2014). Los significados de “aprendizaje ubicuo”. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 22, 1-10.; Cabero, J. (2016). Tendencias educativas para el siglo XXI. (1st ed.). UDIMA.; Campos, F., Rivera, D., y Rodríguez, C. (2014). La presencia e impacto de las universidades de los países andinos en las redes sociales digitales. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, # 69, 571-592. http://www.revistalatinacs. org/069/paper/1025_USC/28es.html; Cantner, U., y Graf, H. (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy, 35(4), 463-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2006.01.002; Cantner, U., Meder, A., y ter Wal, A. L. J. (2010). Innovator networks and regional knowledge base. Technovation, 30(9-10), 496-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2010.04.002; Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., y Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2; Carson, D. A., Carson, D. B., y Hodge, H. (2014). Understanding local innovation systems in peripheral tourism destinations. Tourism Geographies, 16(3), 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2013.868030; Castañeda, L., y Gutiérrez, I. (2010). Redes sociales y otros tejidos online para conectar personas. Aprendizaje con Redes Sociales. Tejidos educativos para los nuevos entornos, 17-39.; Castells, M. (2000a). Internet y la sociedad red. En Conferencia de Presentación del Programa de Doctorado sobre la Sociedad de la Información y el Conocimiento, 7, pp. 1-13. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.; Castells, M. (2000b). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/000713100358408; Chesbrough, H. W. (2009). Innovación abierta: nuevos imperativos para la creación y el aprovechamiento de la tecnología. Plataforma editorial.; Clark, L. (2006). Manual para el mapeo de redes como una herramienta de diagnóstico. http://revista-redes.rediris. es/webredes/textos/Mapeo_redes_LC06.pdf; Cobo, C., y Pardo, H. (2007). Planeta Web 2.0. Inteligencia Colectiva o Medios Fast Food, 27-117; Cobo, C. (2016). La innovación pendiente. Reflexiones sobre educación, tecnología y conocimiento. Colección Fundación Ceibal. Debate.; Coll, C. (2013). El currículo escolar en el marco de la nueva ecología del aprendizaje. Aula de Innovación Educativa, 219, 31-36. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/20319227.pdf; Coll, C., y Monereo, C. (2008). Psicología de la educación virtual. Aprender y enseñar con las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación. Morata.; Consejo Privado de Competitividad. (2019). Índice Departamental de Competitividad. https://idc.compite.com.co/; Cope, B., y Kalantzis, M. (2010). Ubiquitous learning. University of Illinois press.; Cornell University, INSEAD, y WIPO. (2019). Global Innovation Index 2019- Creating Healthy Lives—The Future of Medical Innovation. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/ pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdf; Csizmadia, Z. (2008). Co-operation and ability for innovation. Relationship network foundations of the regional innovation system. Szociologiai Szemle (Sociological Review), 18(2), 22-56.; De Bono, E., y Zimbalist, E. (1970). Lateral thinking. Penguin London.; De Kerckhove, D. (1997). The skin of culture: Investigating the new electronic reality. (Gedisa, Ed.). Taylor y Francis US.; Departamento de Hacienda y Economía del Gobierno Vasco. (2017). Ekonomiaz. En Papel de la universidad en el desarrollo regional (pp. 8-12). http://www.euskadi.eus/ web01-a2reveko/es/k86aEkonomiazWar/ekonomiaz/ downloadPDF?R01HNoPortal=true&idpubl=88®istro=1; Díaz, P. (2014). Huila Construyendo Mundo: desarrollo social a través de la apropiación de ciencia y tecnología en el departamento del Huila, Colombia. En Congreso Iberoamericano de Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación y Educación. Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos. https://www.oei.es/historico/ congreso2014/memoriactei/1252.pdf; Dolfsma, W., y Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Innovation systems as patent networks: The Netherlands, India and Nanotech. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2011.13.3.311; Doran, J., y Jordan, D. (2016). Cross-sectoral differences in the drivers of innovation. Journal of Economic Studies, 43(5), 719-748. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-10-2014-0171; Downes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism y connective knowledge. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(1), 6.; Downes, S. (2017). New models of open and distributed learning. In Open Education: from OERs to MOOCs (pp. 1-22). Springer.; Drabenstott, M. (2008). Universities, Innovation and Regional Development (pp. 1-13). https://doi.org/10.1787/hempv20- art10-en; Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning. Allyn and Bacon.; Drucker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. Butterworth -Heinemann.; Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823-833. https://doi. org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6; Etzkowitz, H. (2018). Chapter 8 : Innovation Governance: From the “Endless Frontier” to the Triple Helix. In Springer (Ed.). Geographies of the University (12th ed., pp. 291-310).; Etzkowitz, H., y Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeerespol/ v_3a29_3ay_3a2000_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a109-123.htm; Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., y Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330. https://doi. org///dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4; Fantoni, J. (2016). La ecología de la acción: conflicto y responsabilidad. The ecology of the action: conflict and responsibility.; Fernández, E., y Anguita, R. (2015) Aprendizajes invisibles en contextos de educación expandida. Retos y oportunidades para la sociedad hiperconectada. Profesorado. Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado, 19, 1-22.; Fischer, M. M., y Varga, A. (2002). Technological Innovation and Interfirm Cooperation An exploratory analysis using survey data from manufacturing firms in the metropolitan region of Vienna. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (10679).; Flores, R. L., Belaud, J.P., Le Lann, J.M., y Negny, S. (2015). Using the Collective Intelligence for inventive problem solving: A contribution for Open Computer Aided Innovation. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9340-9352.; Fritsch, M. (2001). Co-operation in Regional Innovation Systems. Regional Studies, 35(4), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400124434; Fritsch, M., y Graf, H. (2011). How sub-national conditions affect regional innovation systems: The case of the two Germanys. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 331-353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00364.x; Fromhold-Eisebith, M., y Werker, C. (2013). Universities’ functions in knowledge transfer: A geographical perspective. Annals of Regional Science, 51(3), 621-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0559-z; García de León, G. (2009). El concepto de competitividad sistémica. Revista de La Universidad de Sonora, 25, 29-31.; Gergen, K. (1996). Realidades y relaciones. Aproximaciones a la construcción social. Paidos.; Goddard, J. (2018). Chapter 11- The Civic University and the City. In Springer (Ed.). Geographies of the University (12th ed., pp. 355–373). Nottingham.; González-Sánchez, R., y García-Muiña, F. E. (2011). Innovación abierta: Un modelo preliminar desde la gestión del conocimiento. Intangible Capital, 7(1), 82–115.; González-Sanmamed, M., Sangrà, A., Souto-Seijo, A., y Blanco, I. (2018). Ecologías de aprendizaje en la Era Digital: desafíos para la Educación Superior.; Graca, P., y Camarinha, L. (2016). Performance indicators for collaborative business ecosystems. Literature review. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 1-19.; Gros, B. (2105). La caída de los muros del conocimiento en la sociedad digital y las pedagogías emergentes. E.K.S. 16(1), 58-68. DOI:10.14201/eks20151615868; Gros, B., Kinshuk, y Maina, M. (Eds.) (2016). The future of ubiquitous learning: Learning designs for emerging pedagogies. Springer.; Guan, J. C., Zuo, K. R., Chen, K. H., y Yam, R. C. M. (2016). Does country-level R&D efficiency benefit from the collaboration network structure? Research Policy, 45(4), 770-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2016.01.003; Guan, J., Zhang, J., y Yan, Y. (2015). The impact of multilevel networks on innovation. Research Policy, 44(3), 545-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.007; Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., y Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments.; Hanneman, R. (2000). Introducción a los métodos del análisis de redes sociales.; Hansen, T. (2013). Bridging regional innovation: cross-border collaboration in the Øresund Region. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 113(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2013.781306; Hansen, T. (2015). Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1672-1684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00 343404.2013.873120; Haythornthwaite, C. (2015). Learning Ecologies: The individual and the use of Networks. En Nuevos contextos, múltiples mecanismos: ecologías de aprendizaje. Edul@b de la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.0; Hernández-Sampieri, R., y Mendoza-Torres, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación–Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Interamericana. https:// www.ebooks7-24.com:443/?il=6443; Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., y Albors-Garrigos, J. (2014). Are technology gatekeepers renewing clusters? Understanding gatekeepers and their dynamics across cluster life cycles. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 26(5-6), 431-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626. 2014.933489; Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Albors-Garrigos, J., de-Miguel, B., y Hidalgo, A. (2012). The role of a firm’s absorptive capacity and the technology transfer process in clusters: How effective are technology centres in low-tech clusters? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24(7-8), 523- 559. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.710256; Hu, J., Liu, M., y Zhang, J. (2014). A semantic model for academic social network analysis. In 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) (pp. 310-313). https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2014.6921602; Huggins, R., y Johnston, A. (2010). Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: The influence of network resources, spatial proximity and firm size. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(5), 457-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903171350; Inkinen, T., y Kaakinen, I. (2016). Economic Geography of Knowledge-Intensive Technology Clusters: Lessons from the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(1), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.109; Inkinen, T., y Suorsa, K. (2009). Intermediaries in regional innovation systems. High-technology enterprise survey from Northern Finland. Nordia Geographical Publications, 38(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903491556; Instance, D. (2012). Debates de educación: David Istance “Crear entornos innovadores para mejorar el aprendizaje”. https://www.macba.cat/es/educacion-debates-david-istance; Jackson, N. (2015). Lifewide learning. En Nuevos contextos, múltiples mecanismos: ecologías de aprendizaje. Edul@b de la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.; James, R, Mcinnis, C., y Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities : ideas, strategies and resources for quality in student assessment. Richard James (Ed.). Centre for the Study of Higher Education.; Kop, R., y Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3).; Kozma, R. (2012). Las TIC y la transformación de la educación en la economía del conocimiento. http://www.debats.cat/ es/debates/las-tic-y-la-transformacion-de-la-educacionen- la-economia-del-conocimiento; Kustepeli, Y., Gulcan, Y., y Akgungor, S. (2012). The innovativeness of the Turkish textile industry within similar knowledge bases across different regional innovation systems. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412448088; Lafuente, A., y Lara, T. (2003). Aprendizaje situados y prácticas procomunales. Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación, 6(2), 168-177.; Lee, P. C., y Su, H. N. (2010). Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research through keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 12(1), 26- 40. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.1.26; Levy, P. (2010). Cibercultura. Anthropos (Ed.). Editora 34.; López, M., Marulanda, C., y Castaño, J. (2015). Competir y colaborar con conocimiento e innovación. Universidad Nacional de Colombia (Ed.).; Loveless, A., y Williamson, B. (2017). Nuevas indentidades de aprendizaje en la era digital. Creatividad. Educación. Tecnología. Sociedad. Ministerio de Educación.; Lundvall, B. Å. (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 2). Anthem press.; Lundvall, B. A., y Johnson, B. (1994). Sistemas nacionales de innovación y aprendizaje institucional. Comercio Exterior, 44(8), 695-704.; Maggioni, M. A., Uberti, T. E., y Usai, S. (2011). Treating patents as relational data: Knowledge transfers and spillovers across Italian provinces. Industry and Innovation, 18(1), 39-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2010.528928; Makkonen, T., y Rohde, S. (2016). Cross-border regional innovation systems: conceptual backgrounds, empirical evidence and policy implications. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1623-1642. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1184626; Malerba, F. (2007). Innovation and the dynamics and evolution of industries: Progress and challenges. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(4), 675-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.07.005; Marek, D., y Blažek, J. (2016). The challenge of breaking the academia–business firewall in Czechia: comparing the role of differentiated knowledge bases in collaborative R&D projects. European Planning Studies, 24(4), 809-831. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1121204; Martin, R., y Moodysson, J. (2013). Comparing knowledge bases: on the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 170-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411427326; Martínez, J.B., y Fernández, E. (2018). Ecologías del aprendizaje. Educación expandida en contextos múltiples. Ediciones Morata.; Miguélez, E., y Moreno, R. (2015). Knowledge flows and the absorptive capacity of regions. Research Policy, 44(4), 833-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.016; Minguillo, D., y Thelwall, M. (2012a). Mapping the network structure of science parks: An exploratory study of cross-sectoral interactions reflected on the web. Aslib Proceedings, 64(4), 332-357. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211244716; Misión Internacional de Sabios 2019. (2019). Colombia hacia una sociedad del conocimiento. https://minciencias.gov. co/sites/default/files/upload/paginas/ebook-_colombia_ hacia_una_sociedad_del_conocimiento.pdf; Misseri, V. (2013). Local Ecosystem versus Digital Ecosystem: A Different Purpose Than Multiple Innovation Platforms (pp. 688-694). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/3PGCIC.2013.117; Morales-Gualdrón, S. T., y Giraldo-Gómez, A. S. (2015). Análisis de una innovación social: el Comité Universidad Empresa Estado del Departamento de Antioquia (Colombia) y su funcionamiento como mecanismo de interacción. Innovar: Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, 25(56), 141-152. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24329636; Muscio, A. (2013). University-industry linkages: What are the determinants of distance in collaborations? Papers in Regional Science, 92(4), 715-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00442.x; Niu, X. S. (2014). International scientific collaboration between Australia and China: A mixed-methodology for investigating the social processes and its implications for national innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.014; Ó Huallacháin, B., y Kane, K. (2015). Regional Aspects of Collaborative Invention Across National Innovation Systems. European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2227-2252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.942602; Oerlemans, L., y Meeus, M. (2005). Do Organizational and Spatial Proximity Impact on Firm Performance? Regional Studies, 39(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320896; Onrubia, J. (2016). ¿Por qué aprender en red? El debate sobre las finalidades de la educación en la nueva ecología del aprendizaje. En B. Gros-Salvat y C. Suárez-Guerrero (Eds.) (pp. 13-36).; Padilla-Meléndez, A., y Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Open innovation in universities. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552551211239474; Park, S. O. (2003). Economic spaces in the Pacific Rim: A paradigm shift and new dynamics. Papers in Regional Science, 82(2), 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101100200144; Perkmann, M. (2006). Extraregional linkages and the territorial embeddedness of multinational branch plants: Evidence from the South Tyrol region in northeast Italy. Economic Geography, 82(4), 421-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00324.x; Petticrew, M., y Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford (Ed.). Wiley- Blackwell.; Plechero, M., y Chaminade, C. (2016). The role of regional sectoral specialisation on the geography of innovation networks: a comparison between firms located in regions in developed and emerging economies. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 8(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2016.077106; Prats, L., Guia, J., y Molina, F. X. (2008). How tourism destinations evolve: The Notion of Tourism Local Innovation System. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(3), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1057/thr.2008.24; Quatraro, F. (2009). Diffusion of regional innovation capabilities: Evidence from Italian patent data. Regional Studies, 43(10), 1333-1348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802195162; Quintella, R. H., da Silva Monteiro de Freitas, E. J., Ventura, A. C., Santos, M. A., de Melo, D. R. A., da Silva Motta, G., y Jucá, S. (2012). Scientific knowledge networks in peripheral regions and local innovation systems: The case of chemistry in the state of Bahia. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7(1), 85-103.; Radosevic, S. (2002). Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe: determinants, organizers and alignments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 87-96.; Rodríguez, E. F., y Martínez, R. A. (2015). Aprendizajes invisibles en contextos de educación expandida. Retos y oportunidades en la sociedad hiperconectada. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 19(2), 1–16.; Rubach, S. S. (2013). Collaborative Regional Innovation Initiatives: A Booster for Local Company Innovation Processes? Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9270-8; Ruiz-Corbella, M., y Bautista-Cerro, M. J. (2016). La responsabilidad social en la universidad española. Teoría de La Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 28(1), 159–188.; Russell, J.M., Madera, M.J., y Ainsworth, S. (2009). El análisis de redes en el estudio de la colaboración científica. Redes. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 17, 39- 47. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93112847002; Russo, M., y Rossi, F. (2009). Cooperation Networks and Innovation. Evaluation, 15(1), 75-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389008097872; Salavisa, I., Sousa, C., y Fontes, M. (2012). Topologies of innovation networks in knowledge-intensive sectors: Sectoral differences in the access to knowledge and complementary assets through formal and informal ties. Technovation, 32(6), 380-399. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.003; Saleh, M., Abel, M-H., y Misseri, V. (2015). Investigating the similarity between collaboration systems and digital ecosystems (p. 30). The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7230929; Salinas, J. (2000). El aprendizaje colaborativo con los nuevo canales de comunicación (pp. 199-228).; Saltzberg, S., y Polyson, S. (1995). Distributed learning on the world wide web. Syllabus, 9(1), 10-12.; Schøtt, T., y Jensen, K. W. (2016). Firms’ innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of national and firm effects. Research Policy, 45(6), 1233-1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.006; Schüßler, E., Decker, C., y Lerch, F. (2013). Networks of Clusters: A Governance Perspective. Industry and Innovation, 20(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2013.805929; Shapiro, M. A., So, M., y Park, H. W. (2010). Quantifying the national innovation system: Inter-regional collaboration networks in South Korea. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22(7), 845-857. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.511158; Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 15.; Siemens, G., y Downes, S. (2008). Connectivism & connective knowledge. Universidad de Manitoba; Sohn, D. W., Kim, H., y Lee, J. H. (2009). Policy-driven university– Industry linkages and regional innovation networks in Korea. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(4), 647-664. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0890b; Solleiro, J. L., Luna, R. C. K., Herrera, A., y Montiel, M. (2007). A Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy in Mexico, Spain, Chile and Korea. In PICMET ’07–2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (pp. 392-400). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349353; Stantchev, V., Prieto-González, L., y Tamm, G. (2015). Cloud computing service for knowledge assessment and studies recommendation in crowdsourcing and collaborative learning environments based on social network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 762-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2014.11.092; Steiner, M., Gil, J. A., Ehret, O., Ploder, M., y Wink, R. (2010). European medium-technology innovation networks : a multi-methodological multi-regional approach. Int. J. Technology Management, 50(3/4), 229-262.; Steinmo, M., y Rasmussen, E. (2016). How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1250-1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.006; Sternberg, R. (2007). Entrepreneurship, proximity and regional innovation systems. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 98(5), 652-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00431.x; Stiglitz, J. E., y Greenwald, B. C. N. (2015). Creating a learning society. Columbia University Press. http://www. fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set. html?FId=1089748; Stuck, J., Broekel, T., y Revilla Diez, J. (2016). Network Structures in Regional Innovation Systems. European Planning Studies, 24(3), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1074984; Su, H. N., Lee, P. C., y Chan, T. Y. (2010). Bibliometric assessments of network formations by keyword-based vector space model. PICMET ’10–Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, Proceedings–Technology Management for Global Economic Growth, 230-238.; Suárez, C., y Gros-Salvat, B. (2013). Aprender en red. De la interacción a la colaboración (1ª ed, Vol. 52). Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. http://www.digitaliapublishing.com/a/24389/; Takeda, Y., Kajikawa, Y., Sakata, I., y Matsushima, K. (2008). An analysis of geographical agglomeration and modularized industrial networks in a regional cluster: A case study at Yamagata prefecture in Japan. Technovation, 28(8), 531-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2007.12.006; Teixeira, A. A. C., Santos, P., y Delgado, A. (2013). International regional patterns of R & D networks involving low tech SMEs. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 8(2), 1-20.; Tödtling, F., Grillitsch, M., y Höglinger, C. (2012). Knowledge Sourcing and Innovation in Austrian ICT Companies-How Does Geography Matter? Industry and Innovation, 19(4), 327-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.694678; Tsai, H-T., Huang, S-Z., y Wang, C-H. (2015). Cross-border R&D alliance networks: An empirical study of the umbilical cord blood banking industry in emerging markets. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(3), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2015.1120502; Valkering, P., Beumer, C., de Kraker, J., y Ruelle, C. (2013). An analysis of learning interactions in a cross-border network for sustainable urban neighbourhood development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.09.010; van der Valk, T., y Gijsbers, G. (2010). The use of social network analysis in innovation studies: Mapping actors and technologies. Innovation-management Policy & Practice–INNOV-MANAG POLICY PRACT (Vol. 12). https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.1.5; Velázquez, A., y Aguilar, N. (2005). Manual introductorio al análisis de redes sociales.; von Proff, S., y Brenner, T. (2014). The dynamics of inter- regional collaboration: An analysis of co-patenting. Annals of Regional Science, 52(1), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0573-1; Wasserman, S., y Faust, K. (1999). Social Network Analysis- Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.; Wellman, B., y Haythornthwaite, C. (2008). The Internet in everyday life. John Wiley & Sons.; World Economic Forum. (2015). Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015.; World Economic Forum. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report. Ginebra-Suiza. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/ WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf; Wheeler, S., y Sangra, A. (2013). Nuevas formas de aprendizaje informales: ¿O estamos formalizando lo informal? RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 10(1), 107-115. http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4615784; Yan, J. (2011). A study on consulting network of university research team. In 2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIMSEC) (pp. 1871-1874). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIMSEC.2011.6011215; Yokura, Y., Matsubara, H., y Sternberg, R. (2013). R&D networks and regional innovation: A social network analysis of joint research projects in Japan. Area, 45(4), 493-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12055; Zhao, S. L., Cacciolatti, L., Lee, S. H., y Song, W. (2015). Regional collaborations and indigenous innovation capabilities in China: A multivariate method for the analysis of regional innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 202-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.014; Guayán Perdomo, O. E. (2022). Aprendizaje e Innovación Una red social para el fomento de la competitividad regional. Universidad, Empresa, Estado, Sociedad. Universidad Santo Tomás.; http://hdl.handle.net/11634/47949; https://doi.org/10.15332/li.lib.2022.000214; reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás; instname:Universidad Santo Tomás