Showing 1 - 20 results of 52 for search 'SOCIAL choice' Narrow Search
1
Academic Journal

Superior Title: Con-texto; No. 58 (2022): Julio-Diciembre; 213-225 ; Con-texto; Núm. 58 (2022): Julio-Diciembre; 213-225 ; 2346-2078 ; 0123-6458

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/contexto/article/view/8658/13652; Arrow, K. J. (1950). ”A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare”. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 328-346.; Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.; Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.; Arrow, K. J. (1967). Values and Collective Decision-Making. In Laslett, P. & Runciman, W. G. (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society, Third Series. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, Ch. 10, 215-232.; Arrow, K. J. (1974b). The Limits of Organization. New York: W.W. Norton.; Barberá, S. (2009). “Economía del Bienestar y Teoría de la Elección Social”. En García-Bermejo, J. C. (ed.) Sobre la Economía y sus Métodos. Madrid: Trotta, 449-475.; Dasgupta, P. & Maskin, E. (2014). “On the Robustness of Majority Rule”. In Maskin, E. & Sen, A. (eds.) The Arrow Impossibility Theorem. New York: Columbia University Press, 101-142.; Feiwel, G. R. (ed.) (1987). Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. New York: New York University Press.; Grünig, R. & Kühn, R. (2005). Successful Decision-making: A Systematic Approach to Complex Problems. Berlin. New York: Springer.; Maskin, E. & Sen, A. (2014). The Arrow Impossibility Theorem. New York: Columbia University Press. Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day. (Revised edition by North-Holland, 1979; Expanded edition by Penguin Books, 2017).; Sen, A. K. (1985). “Social Choice and Justice: A Review Article”. Journal of Economic Literature, 23(4), 1764-1776.; Sen, A. K. (2000). Desarrollo y libertad. Barcelona: Planeta.; Whitaker, J. K. (1987). “The Limits of Organization Revisited”. In Feiwel, G. (ed.) Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. New York: New York University Press, 565-583.; https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/contexto/article/view/8658

9
10
Academic Journal

Superior Title: Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas; Vol. 51 Núm. 2 (2017); 173-194 ; Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas; Vol. 51 No. 2 (2017); 173-194 ; 2357-4100 ; 0034-7426

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/recolma/article/view/70900/65003; C. E. Alchourrón, P. Gärdenfors, and D. Makinson, On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions, J. Symb. Log. 50 (1985), no. 2, 510-530.; K. J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values, Cowles Commission Monograph No. 12, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N. Y.; Chapman & Hall, Ltd., London, 1951.; S. Barberà, Manipulation of social decision functions, J. Econom. Theory 15 (1977), no. 2, 266-278.; S. Barberà, Strategy-proof social choice, Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare (A. K. Sen K. J. Arrow and K. Suzumura, eds.), vol. 2, Elsevier, 2010, pp. 731-832.; S. Barberà, W. Bossert, and P. K. Pattanaik, Ranking sets of objects, Handbook of Utility Theory (C. Seidl S. Barber~A , P.J. Hammond, ed.), vol. 2, Kluwer Publisher, 2004, pp. 893-978.; S. Barberà, B. Dutta, and A. Sen, Strategy-proof social choice correspondences, J. Econom. Theory 101 (2001), no. 2, 374-394.; J.-P. Benoît, Strategic manipulation in voting games when lotteries and ties are permitted, J. Econom. Theory 102 (2002), no. 2, 421-436.; W. Bossert, P. K. Pattanaik, and Y. Xu, Ranking opportunity sets: an axiomatic approach, J. Econom. Theory 63 (1994), no. 2, 326-345.; S. Brams and P. C. Fishburn, Voting procedures, Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare (K. J. Arrow, A. K. Sen, and K. Suzumura, eds.), vol. 1, 2002, pp. 173-236.; F. Brandt, Group-strategyproof irresolute social choice functions, IJCAI 2011, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, July 16-22, 2011 (T.Walsh, ed.), IJCAI/AAAI, 2011, pp. 79-84.; F. Brandt and M. Brill, Necessary and sufficient conditions for the strategyproofness of irresolute social choice functions, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK-2011), Groningen, The Netherlands, July 12-14, 2011 (R. A. Krzysztof, ed.), ACM, 2011, pp. 136-142.; S. Chopra, A. K. Ghose, and T. A. Meyer, Social choice theory, belief merging, and strategy-proofness, Information Fusion 7 (2006), no. 1, 61-79.; S. Coste-Marquis, J. Lang, P. Liberatore, and P. Marquis, Expressive power and succinctness of propositional languages for preference representation, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference (KR2004), Whistler, Canada, June 2-5, 2004 (D. Dubois, C. A. Welty, and M.-A. Williams, eds.), AAAI Press, 2004, pp. 203-212.; B. de Finetti, La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré 7 (1937), 1-68.; K. Downing and M. van Hees, In praise of manipulation, British Journal of Political Science 38 (2008), 1-15.; D. Dubois and H. Fargier, A unified framework for order-of-magnitude confidence relations, Proceedings of the 20th conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence (Arlington, Virginia, United States), UAI '04, AUAI Press, 2004, pp. 138-145.; D. Dubois, H. Fargier, and P. Perny, Qualitative decision theory with preference relations and comparative uncertainty: An axiomatic approach, Artif. Intell. 148 (2003), no. 1-2, 219-260.; D. Dubois, H. Fargier, H. Prade, and P. Perny, Qualitative decision theory: from savage's axioms to nonmonotonic reasoning, J. ACM 49 (2002), no. 4, 455-495.; D. Dubois, J. Lang, and H. Prade, Possibilistic logic, Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming, Vol. 3 (Dov M. Gabbay, C. H. Hogger, and J. A. Robinson, eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1994, pp. 439-513.; D. Dubois and H. Prade, Possibilistic logic: a retrospective and prospective view, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 144 (2004), no. 1, 3-23.; J. Duggan and T. Schwartz, Strategic manipulability without resoluteness or shared beliefs: Gibbard-Satterthwaite generalized, Soc. Choice Welf. 17 (2000), no. 1, 85-93.; H. Egli, A mathematical model for nondeterministic computations, Tech. report, ETH, 1975.; P. Everaere, S. Konieczny, and P. Marquis, The strategy-proofness land-scape of merging, J. Artif. Intell. Res. 28 (2007), 49-105.; P. C. Fishburn, Even-chance lotteries in social choice theory, Theory and Decision 3 (1972), no. 1, 18-40.; D. M. Gabbay, O. Rodrigues, and G. Pigozzi, Connections between belief revision, belief merging and social choice, J. Log. Comput. 19 (2009), no. 3, 445-446.; P. Gärdenfors, Manipulation of social choice functions, Journal of Economic Theory 13 (1976), no. 2, 217-228.; C. Geist and U. Endriss, Automated search for impossibility theorems in social choice theory: Ranking sets of objects, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 40 (2011), 143-174.; A. Gibbard, Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result, Econometrica 41 (1973), 587-601.; D. Grossi, Correspondences in the theory of aggregation, Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory - LOFT 8, Revised and selected papers (W. van der Hoek G. Bonanno, B. Loewe, ed.), vol. 1, 2010, pp. 34-60.; J. Y. Halpern, Defining relative likelihood in partially-ordered preferential structures, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 7 (1997), 1-24.; J. S. Kelly, Strategy-proofness and social choice functions without single-valuedness, Econometrica 45 (1977), no. 2, 439-446.; J. S. Kelly, Social Choice theory: An introduction, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.; J. G. Kemeny, Mathematics without numbers, Daedalus 18 (1959), 577-591.; S. Konieczny and R. Pino Pérez, Merging information under constraints: A logical framework, J. Log. Comput. 12 (2002), no. 5, 773-808.; S. Konieczny and R. Pino Pérez, Propositional belief base merging or how to merge beliefs/goals coming from several sources and some links with social choice theory, European Journal of Operational Research 160 (2005), no. 3, 785-802.; S. Konieczny and R. Pino Pérez, Logic based merging, J. Philosophical Logic 40 (2011), no. 2, 239-270.; J. F. Leal, Manipulabilidad en la teoría de elección social, Master's thesis, Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad de Los Andes, Mérida, Venezuela, 2005.; D. Makinson, Combinatorial versus decision-theoretic components of impossibility theorems, Theory and Decision 40 (1996), no. 2, 181-189.; R. Milner, Processes: a mathematical model of computing agents, Logic Colloquium '73 (Bristol, 1973), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 80, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, pp. 157-173.; R. Pino Perez and F. Leal, A notion of manipulability based on lifting preferences, Tech. report, No 252. Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad de Los Andes, 2007.; M. S. Pini, F. Rossi, K. B. Venable, and T. Walsh, Aggregating partially ordered preferences, J. Log. Comput. 19 (2009), no. 3, 475-502.; P. J. Reny, Arrow's theorem and the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem: a unified approach, Econom. Lett. 70 (2001), no. 1, 99-105.; M. A. Satterthwaite, Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions, J. Econom. Theory 10 (1975), no. 2, 187-217.; G. L. S. Shackle, On the meaning and measure of uncertainty, Metroeconomica 5 (1953), 97-115.; G. L. S. Shackle, Uncertainty in economics and other reflections, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995.; A. D. Taylor, Social choice and the mathematics of manipulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005.; J. van Benthem, P. Girard, and O. Roy, Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences, Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2009), 83-125.; P. Vincke, Arrow's theorem is not a surprising result, European J. Oper. Res. 10 (1982), no. 1, 22-25.; https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/recolma/article/view/70900

11
Academic Journal

Superior Title: Ensayos de Economía; Vol. 27 No. 51 (2017); 163-178 ; Ensayos de Economía; Vol. 27 Núm. 51 (2017); 163-178 ; 2619-6573 ; 0121-117X

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ede/article/view/69110/65163; Archibald, G. (1959). Welfare Economics, Ethics and Essentialism. Economica, 26(104), 316-327.; Arrow, K. J. (1963). Uncertainty and The Welfare Economics of Medical Care. The American Economic Review, 53(5), 941-973.; Atkinson, A. (2009). Welfare Economics and Giving for Development. En K. Basu, Arguments For A Better World. Essays in honor for Amartya Sen. Oxford University Press.; Bentham, J. (1948 [1780]) ). The Principles of Morals and Legislation. Hafner Press: New York.; Bergson, A. (1938). A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics. The Quartely Journal of Economics, 52(2), 233-252.; Blaugh, M. (2007). The Fundamental Theorems of Modern Welfare Economics. Historically Contemplated, History of Political Economy, 39(2), 185-207. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2007-001; Broome, J. (2009). Why Economics Needs Ethical Theory. En K. Basu, Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen,1,7-14. New York: Oxford University Press.; Hicks, J. R. (1939). The Foundation of Welfare Economics. Economic Journal,49(196), 696-712.; Kaldor, N. (1939). Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility. Economic Journal, 49(195), 549-552.; Lange, O. (1942). The Foundations of Welfare Economics. Econometrica, 10(3/4), 215-228.; Lipsey, R. y Lancaster, K. (1957). The General Thory of Second Best. The Review of Economic Studies, 24(1), 11-32.; Lipsey, R. (2007). Reflections on The General Theory of The Second Best at It's Golden Jubilee. International Tax and Public Finance, 14(4), 349-364.; Pareto, W. (1972 [1906]). Manual of Political Economics. New York: A.M. Kelley.; Robbins, L. (1944 [1932]). Ensayo sobre la naturaleza y significación de la ciencia económica. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.; Samuelson, P. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge (M.A.): Harvard University Press.; Sen, A. (2014). The Informational Basis of Social Choice. En E. M. Sen, The Arrow Impossibility Theorem, New York: Columbia University Press, 67-100.; Stiglitz, J. (1984). Theory of Competition, Incentives and Risk. Economic Research Program, No. 311, Princeton University.; https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ede/article/view/69110

12
Academic Journal

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ede/article/view/69110; Universidad Nacional de Colombia Revistas electrónicas UN Ensayos de Economía; Ensayos de Economía; Bustamante Torres, Jorge (2017) El óptimo paretiano y los teoremas fundamentales del bienestar social: una revisión crítica. Ensayos de Economía, 27 (51). pp. 163-178. ISSN 2619-6573; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/64337; http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/65255/

13
Academic Journal

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/recolma/article/view/70900; Universidad Nacional de Colombia Revistas electrónicas UN Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas; Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas; Leal, Jahn Franklin and Pino Pérez, Ramón (2017) A weak version of Barberà-Kelly's Theorem. Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas, 51 (2). pp. 173-194. ISSN 2357-4100; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/66430; http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/67458/

14
Academic Journal

File Description: application/pdf; text/html; application/xml

Relation: https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5076/6133; https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5076/6443; https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5076/6600; Núm. 37 , Año 2017 : Julio-Diciembre; 84; 37; 67; 19; Revista de Economía Institucional; Arrow, K. (1972). El equilibrio económico general: propósito, técnicas analíticas, elección colectiva. Los premios Nobel de economía 1969-1977 (pp. 155-189). México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.; Arrow, K. (1986). Valores y toma de decisiones. F. Hahn y M. Hollis (eds.), Filosofía y teoría económica (pp. 218-250). México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.; Béjar, H. (2000). El corazón de la República: avatares de la virtud política. Barcelona: Paidós.; Colomer, J. (1991). Estudio introductorio. Lecturas de teoría política positiva (pp. 9-33). Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.; Colomer, J. (2000). Instituciones políticas. Barcelona: Ariel.; Downs, A. (1957). Teoría económica de la democracia. Madrid: Aguilar.; Feiwel, G. R. (1987). Opiniones de Arrow sobre la equidad, la eficiencia y la democracia. El Trimestre Económico, 54(215), 457-485.; González, J. I. (2006). Ética, economía y políticas sociales. Medellín: Corporación Región.; Hahn, F. (1983). La teoría del equilibrio general. D. Bell y I. Kristol (eds.), Crisis de la teoría económica. Buenos Aires: El Cronista Comercial.; Helmke, G. y Levitsky, S. (2006). Introduction. G. Gretchen y S. Levitsky (eds.), Informal institutions and democracy: Lessons from Latin America (pp. 1-30). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.; Hicks, J. (1934). Una reconsideración de la teoría del valor. J. Hicks (ed.), Riqueza y bienestar. Ensayos sobre teoría económica (pp. 19-71). México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.; Hicks, J. (1939). Fundamentos de la economía del bienestar. J. Hicks (ed.), Riqueza y bienestar. Ensayos sobre teoría económica (pp. 75-93). México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.; Hicks, J. (1975). Alcance y situación de la economía del bienestar. J. Hicks (ed.), Riqueza y bienestar. Ensayos sobre teoría económica (pp. 234-255). México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.; Krugman, P. (1997). Desarrollo, geografía y teoría económica. Barcelona: Antoni Bosch.; Mejía Q., O. (2008). Legitimidad, desobediencia civil y estabilidad. El giro hegeliano republicano en la teoría política de John Rawls. J. I. González y M. Pérez (eds.), Pluralismo, legitimidad y economía política. Ensayos críticos sobre la obra de John Rawls (pp. 107-129). Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia y Universidad Nacional de Colombia.; O’Donnell, G. y Tokman, V. (1998). Poverty and inequality in Latin America. Some political reflections. V. Tokman y G. O’Donnell (eds.), Poverty and inequality in Latin America. Issues and new challenges (pp. 49-69). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.; Ocampo, J. A. (2008). Las concepciones de la política social. Nueva Sociedad, 215, 36-61.; Ostry, J.; Berg, A. et al. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth. IMF discussion note.; Pocock, J. G. (1975). The machiavellian moment. Reino Unido: Princeton University Press.; Rawls, J. (1993). Liberalismo político. México DF: UNAM y Fondo de Cultura Económica.; Sen, A. (1970a). Elección colectiva y bienestar social. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.; Sen, A. (1970b). La imposibilidad de un liberal paretiano. F. Hahn y M. Hollis (eds.), Filosofía y teoría económica (pp. 251-262). México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.; Sen, A. (1973). Behaviour and the concept of preference. J. Elster (ed.), Rational Choice (pp. 60-81). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.; Sen, A. (1976). Los tontos racionales: una crítica de los fundamentos conductistas de la teoría económica. F. Hahn y M. Hollis (eds.), Filosofía y teoría económica (pp. 251-262). México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.; Sen, A. (1984). El bienestar y la libertad. A. Sen (ed.), Bienestar, justicia y mercado (pp. 61-84). Barcelona: Paidós.; Sen, A. (1985). Social choice and justice: A review article. Journal of Economic Literature, 23(4), 1764-1776.; Sen, A. (1987). Sobre ética y economía. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.; Sen, A. (1990). Mercados y libertades: logros y limitaciones del mecanismo de mercado en el fomento de las libertades individuales. A. Sen (ed.), Bienestar, justicia y mercado (pp. 123-156). Barcelona: Paidós.; Sen, A. (2000). Desarrollo y libertad [1999]. Barcelona: Planeta.; Sen, A. (2010). La idea de la justicia [2009]. Bogotá: Taurus.; Van Parijs, P. (1993). ¿Qué es una sociedad justa? Introducción a la práctica de la filosofía política. Barcelona: Ariel.; https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/12156; https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v19n37.04