Showing 1 - 20 results of 2,631 for search 'CRITICAL thinking' Narrow Search
2
Book

File Description: 22 p.; application/pdf

Relation: Reproducción del documento original; Archivo Digital descarga y online disponible en: https://usi.edu.ar/publicaciones/coleccion-periferias/; Mora Jiménez, H. (2024). Pensamiento crítico de la economía. En Zúñiga, M., Arreondo Vélez, J. y Hugo, A. (Coord.), Racionalidad, ciencia y crítica en El capital de Karl Marx: ensayos contra la racionalidad económica moderna (1ª ed.) (pp. 58-80). Beccar, Poliedro Editorial de la Universidad de San Isidro. https://usi.edu.ar/publicaciones/coleccion-periferias/; http://hdl.handle.net/11674/6263

6
Academic Journal

Authors: Ferrer C, Omar A

Superior Title: RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218; Vol. 5 No. 5 (2024): CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE ARTICLES; e555235 ; RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218; Vol. 5 Núm. 5 (2024): HAGA CLIC AQUÍ PARA ACCEDER A LOS ARTÍCULOS; e555235 ; RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218; v. 5 n. 5 (2024): CLIQUE AQUI PARA ACESSAR OS ARTIGOS; e555235 ; RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218; Vol. 5 N.º 5 (2024): CLIQUE AQUI PARA ACESSAR OS ARTIGOS; e555235 ; 2675-6218

File Description: application/pdf

18
Academic Journal

Superior Title: Revista Complutense de Educación; Vol. 35 No. 2 (2024); 363-379 ; Revista Complutense de Educación; Vol. 35 Núm. 2 (2024); 363-379 ; 1988-2793 ; 1130-2496

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/85615/4564456569043; Aguilar-Forero, N.J. (2019). Ciberactivismo y educación para la ciudadanía mundial: Una investigación-acción participativa con dos experiencias educativas de Bogotá. Palabra Clave, 22(2), e22210. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2019.22.2.10; *Al-Zou’bi, R. (2021). The impact of media and information literacy on acquiring the critical thinking skill by the educational faculty’s students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100782; *Almuqrin, A., Zhang, Z.J., Alzamil, A., Mutambik, I., & Alhabeeb, A. (2020). The explanatory power of social capital in determining knowledge sharing in higher education: A case from Saudi Arabia. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 25(3), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol25no3.5; Gil-Fernández, R. & Calderón-Garrido, D. (2021). El uso de las redes sociales en educación: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica. Digital Education Review, 40, 82-109. https://raco.cat/index.php/DER/article/view/395132; Gil-Fernández, R., Calderón, D., & Martín Piñol, C. (2023). Exploring the effect of social media in Personal Learning Environments in the university settings: analysing experiences and detecting future challenges. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 23(71),1-24. AUTORES (2023) http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red.526311; *Berestova, A., Ermakov, D., Aitbayeva, A., Gromov, E., & Vanina, E. (2021). Social networks to improve the creative thinking of students: How does it works? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100912; *Camas, L., Valero, A., & Vendrell, M. (2018). “Hacking memes”: Democratic culture, social media and education. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 11(23), 120-129. http://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v12i23.2017; *Castellví, J., Díez-Bedmar, M.C., & Santisteban, A. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ critical digital literacy skills and attitudes to address social problems. Social Sciences, 9(8), 134-145. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9080134; *Chang, W.H., Liu, Y.C., & Huang, T.H. (2017). Perceptions of learning effectiveness in M‐learning: Scale development and student awareness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 461-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12192.; *Chelysheva, I., & Mikhaleva, G. (2021). Programs and projects for fostering interethnic tolerance among youth: Foreign and russian experience. Медиаобразование, 1. https://doi.org/10.13187/me.2021.1.45; *Chen, C.M., & Tsao, H.W. (2021). An instant perspective comparison system to facilitate learners’ discussion effectiveness in an online discussion process. Computers & Education, 164, 104037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104037; *Demirbilek, M. (2015). Social media and peer feedback: What do students really think about using Wiki and Facebook as platforms for peer feedback? Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(3), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415589530; *Duart-Montoliu, J.M., Roig-Vila, R., Mengual-Andrés, S. & Maseda-Durán, M.A. (2017). La calidad pedagógica de los MOOC a partir de la revisión sistemática de las publicaciones JCR y Scopus (2013-2015). Revista Española de Pedagogía, 75(266), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP75-1-2017-02; Ennis, R.H. (2015). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. En M. Davies y R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (pp. 31-49). Palgrave Handbooks.; *Fidan, M., & Debbağ, M. (2018). The usage of video blog (vlog) in the “school experience” course: The opinions of the pre-service teachers. Journal of Education and Future, 13, 161-177.; Figuera Avellán, S. (2022). Usos de las redes sociales: cibercultura y pensamiento crítico. Atenas, 3(59), 49–64.; Fonseca Morillo, F. (2020). Prólogo: La Europa que protege, de la teoría a la práctica gracias al pensamiento crítico y la alfabetización digital. Revista De Estilos de Aprendizaje, 13(26), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v13i26.2593; *Frydenberg, M., & Andone, D. (2016). Creating micro-videos to demonstrate technology learning and digital literacy. Interactive Technology and Smart Education.13(4), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2016-0030; *Galan, N., & Khodabandehloo, A. (2016). Learning with LinkedIn: Students' perceptions of incorporating subject-related blogging in an international marketing course. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. 13(2), 166-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-10-2015-0033; *García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23, e28600. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600; *Gozálvez-Pérez, V., Valero-Moya, A., & González-Martín, M. (2021). El pensamiento crítico en las redes sociales: Una propuesta teórica para la educación cívica en entornos digitales. Estudios sobre educación, 42, 35-54. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.42.002; Guirao-Goris, J.A., Olmedo Salas, A., & Ferrer Ferrandis, E. (2008). El artículo de revisión. Revista Iberoamericana de Enfermería Comunitaria, 1(1.6).; Hanell, F. (2017). Teacher trainees’ information sharing activities and identity positioning on Facebook. Journal of Documentation, 73(2), 244-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0085; Harden, A. & Thomas, J. (2010). Mixed methods and systematic reviews: Examples and emerging issues. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp.749–774). Sage.; *Hill, J., Thomas, G., Diaz, A., & Simm, D. (2016). Borderland spaces for learning partnership: Opportunities, benefits, and challenges. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(3), 375-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1144728; *Hussain, I., Cakir, O., & Candeger, Ü. (2018). Social Media as a Learning Technology for University Students. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 281-296. http://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11219a; *Johnston, N. (2020). Living in the world of fake news: High school students’ evaluation of information from social media sites. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 69(4), 430-450. http://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2020.1821146; Kahneman, D. (2014). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. PRH Grupo Editorial; Kitchenham, B. & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Technical Report EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf; *Koh, E., Jonathan, C., & Tan, J.P.L. (2019). Exploring conditions for enhancing critical thinking in networked learning: Findings from a secondary school learning analytics environment. Education Sciences, 9(4), 287.; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040287; *Larizgoitia, A., Madariaga-López, I., & Ajamil, E. (2020). Prácticas artísticas prosumidoras para la creación de una mirada crítica en tiempos hipervisuales. Tercio Creciente, 11, 125-136. https://doi.org/10.17561/rtc.extra2.5730; Levintin, D. J. (2017). Weaponized lies: How to think critically in the post-truth era. Penguin.; *López-García, D.; Mateo, T.; Cortés Ancos, E.; Fernández de Viana, I. (2016). A debate and decision-making tool for enhanced learning. IEEE transactions on Learning technologies, 9(3), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2556664; *Maftei, A., Holman, A.C., & Merlici, I.A. (2021). Using fake news as means of cyber-bullying: The link with compulsive internet use and online moral disengagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107032; Maggio, L.A., Costello, J.A., Norton, C., Driessen, E.W. & Artino, A.R. (2020). Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis. Perspectives on Medical Education, 10, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.12.088542; *Meneses, L.F. (2021). Thinking critically through controversial issues on digital media: Dispositions and key criteria for content evaluation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100927; Moher, D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., & Altman D.G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007; *Morejón-Llamas, N. (2020). Desinformación y alfabetización mediática desde las instituciones: Los decálogos contra las fake news. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, 10(20), 111-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-20-2020-07-111-134; *Muellenbach, J. M. (2019). Use of Diverse Online Resources amongst Politically Active University Students Fosters Civic Knowledge Integration. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(2), 131.; *Oh, E.G., Huang, W.H.D., Hedayati Mehdiabadi, A., & Ju, B. (2018). Facilitating critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: Comparison between peer-and instructor-redirection. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 489-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9180-6; *Oria, B. (2020). EDMODO as telecollaborative learning tool in the English Language Classroom. Encuentro, 28, 49-70.; *Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow, C.D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71; *Pattanapichet, F., & Wichadee, S. (2015). Using space in social media to promote undergraduate students’critical thinking skills. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.94170; *Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. Sage.; Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing.; *Puig, B., Blanco-Anaya, P., & Pérez-Maceira, J.J. (2021). “Fake News” or Real Science? Critical Thinking to Assess Information on COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 6, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.646909; *Rajagopalan, K. (2019). Cross-cultural competence and the new literacy: The indispensable need for critical thinking. Revista da Anpoll. 1(49), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.18309/anp.v1i49.1306; *Riser, D.K., Clarke, S.D., & Stallworth, A.N. (2020). Scientific memes: Using the language of social media to improve scientific literacy and communication in lifespan development. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(3), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1475725720929277; *Romero, W., Morante, M.C., & López, B.C. (2022). Alfabetización mediática crítica para mejorar la competencia del alumnado. Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación, (70), 47-57.; *Mesquita-Romero, W., Fernández-Morante, C., & Cebreiro-López, B. (2022). Critical media literacy to improve students' competencies. [Alfabetización mediática crítica para mejorar la competencia del alumnado]. Comunicar, 70, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.3916/C70-2022-04; Saini, M. & Shlonsky, A. (2012). Systematic synthesis of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.; *Santisteban, A., Díez-Bedmar, M.C., & Castellví, J. (2020). Critical digital literacy of future teachers in the Twitter Age. Culture and Education, 32(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2020.1741875; Serrano-Estrada, L., Martin, T.J., & Marti, P. (2021). Understanding city dynamics: using geolocated social media in a problem-based activity as an investigative tool to enhance student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1(22). https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.2004390; *Shapovalova, E. (2020). Improving media education as a way to combat fake news. Медиаобразование, 60(4), 730-735. https://doi.org/10.13187/me.2020.4.730; *Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner-Smith, S., Gozza-Cohen, M., Vickers, J., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Reconceptualizing the community of inquiry framework: An exploratory analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 9-17. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.002; *Sohoni,T. (2019). Harnessing the Power of Social Media in the Classroom: Challenging Students to Create Content to Share on Social Media Sites to Improve Learning Outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 30(3), 389-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2018.1538420; *Stevenson, M., Hedberg, J., Highfield, K., & Diao, M. (2015). Visualizing Solutions: Apps as Cognitive Stepping‑Stones in the Learning Process. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(5), 366-379.; *Suárez-López, D., Colón López, C., Cohen Jiménez, J., & Colpas, E. (2016). Apropiación de la Redes sociales para la aplicación del método Socrático en el pensamiento crítico. Zona Próxima, 25, 118-128. https://doi.org//10.14482/zp.22.5832; *Suárez, M.M., & González Argüello, M.V. (2020). Becoming a good BookTuber. RELC Journal, 51(1), 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220906905; *Šuminas, A., & Jastramskis, D. (2020). The importance of media literacy education: How Lithuanian students evaluate online news content credibility. Central European Journal of Communication, 13(2), 230-248. https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.13.2(26).5; *Tawfik, G.M., Dila, K.A.S., Mohamed, M.Y.F. (2019). A step-by-step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Tropic Medicine and Health, 47(46). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0165-6; *Teba, E. (2021). Educando al homo digitalis: El papel de la educación y del digcomedu para paliar los efectos de los algoritmos, las fakenews, la polarización y falta de pensamiento crítico. Vivat Academia. Revista de Comunicación, 154, 71-92. http://doi.org/10.15178/va.2021.154.e1378; *Thormann, J., Gable, S., Fidalgo, P.S., & Blakeslee, G. (2013). Interaction, critical thinking, and social network analysis (SNA) in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 294-318. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1306; *Triviño, L., & Vaquero, C. (2020). Artistic and citizenship education in the initial training of primary school teachers: A case study for developing critical, creative and social thinking through malamente 'Malamente'. Revista Complutense De Educación, 31(3), 375-385. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.63488; *Valdiviezo, J.L.C., Viteri, J.C.R., & Carrera, G.M.D. (2016). Twitter en la Educación. Revista Publicando, 3(9), 238-249. https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/359; *Vurdien, R., & Puranen, P. (2016). A Spanish-Finnish Telecollaboration to Develop Intercultural Competence and Learner Autonomy. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 36-53. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2016070103; *Walton, G., & Hepworth, M. (2013). Using assignment data to analyse a blended information literacy intervention: A quantitative approach. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 45(1), 53-63. http://doi.org/10.1177/0961000611434999; *Weiss, A.P., Alwan, A., Garcia, E.P., & Kirakosian, A.T. (2021). Toward a Comprehensive Model of Fake News: A New Approach to Examine the Creation and Sharing of False Information. Societies, 11(3), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030082; *Zhdanko, A. (2019). Identification of cognitive manipulations that have the greatest impact on students in the internet. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 7(1), 35-42. http://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1901035Z; *Zulkifli, N.D.; Abd Halim, N.; Yahaya & Van Der Meijden, H. (2020). Patterns of Critical Thinking Processing in Online Reciprocal Peer Tutoring Through Facebook Discussion. IEEE Access, 8, 24269-24283. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968960; https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/85615